Trans States
#9041
I wish people would stop throwing stones at each other on this thread. Before the last contract and some new management, TSA was known as a hell hole but the pilot group was a great group of people. Can't we all just get along? The coffee thing is what it is but honestly I've never heard of schedulers purposely lying or breaking FAR 117 or this so called attitude of flying unsafe. Matter of fact, most memos refer to slowing down and taking your time. They want to see on time flights but more importantly they want flights to go out safe. For what it's worth CQFOs are a necessary part of the growth for TSA. Yeah they are a recruiting tool for the airline but that's not the primary reason they are hiring them. If they was the case, they would have never stopped hiring them for a few months. They provide flexibility for staffing. We have a low number of FOs who are actually qualified to upgrade currently.
#9042
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
I really love these tards that work here trying to talk bad about CQFO's, yet in 4 button pushes on the FMS (direct to an altitude that is already programmed to a 3 degree glideslope, then putting 3 degrees right back in) shows me they have zero clue how the FMS works. Even better is when they manually jack up the pre-loaded altitudes on an arrival and guess with a 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, etc glideslope to try and get all the attitudes right when they were already pre-set in the database at pre-determined angles by Honeywell, based on what runway you're going to. But that's the "TransStates way".
#9043
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,931
I really love these tards that work here trying to talk bad about CQFO's, yet in 4 button pushes on the FMS (direct to an altitude that is already programmed to a 3 degree glideslope, then putting 3 degrees right back in) shows me they have zero clue how the FMS works. Even better is when they manually jack up the pre-loaded altitudes on an arrival and guess with a 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, etc glideslope to try and get all the attitudes right when they were already pre-set in the database at pre-determined angles by Honeywell, based on what runway you're going to. But that's the "TransStates way".
#9044
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 558
I really love these tards that work here trying to talk bad about CQFO's, yet in 4 button pushes on the FMS (direct to an altitude that is already programmed to a 3 degree glideslope, then putting 3 degrees right back in) shows me they have zero clue how the FMS works. Even better is when they manually jack up the pre-loaded altitudes on an arrival and guess with a 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, etc glideslope to try and get all the attitudes right when they were already pre-set in the database at pre-determined angles by Honeywell, based on what runway you're going to. But that's the "TransStates way".
#9045
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
You know some people select the altitude to see what kind of glide angle they will cross at. I like setting a 3.5 angle, but if it is during the winter I'll set it around 2.0 just in case there is icing at lower altitude. Plus have you tried the pre set alt going into Dulles. It's basically power idle, speed brake out, and praying that you'll make it at the right altitude and speed. But hey maybe you're the reason why I keep getting emails about missing crossing restrictions because you know everything about the FMS.
#9046
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 101
What's the latest with training? Are they filling classes, pass rate, etc. Heard there's a backlog with FO's awaiting ioe
#9047
Last I heard was class sizes have been reduced because of the training backlog. Sounds reasonable, or its a cover up for the lack of interest/lack of available pilots. Who knows. Captain upgrades are waiting 6 weeks for ioe, FOs 8 weeks. We recently lost 4 check airman to mainline carriers which is a sizeable contingent for a smaller airline. 2 to United, 1 to UPS and I forget the last one.
#9048
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 101
Last I heard was class sizes have been reduced because of the training backlog. Sounds reasonable, or its a cover up for the lack of interest/lack of available pilots. Who knows. Captain upgrades are waiting 6 weeks for ioe, FOs 8 weeks. We recently lost 4 check airman to mainline carriers which is a sizeable contingent for a smaller airline. 2 to United, 1 to UPS and I forget the last one.
#9049
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: Furloughed
Posts: 104
I honestly don't know why people use the fms for glideslope in the first place. It's simple math. Every once in awhile a pm will throw in 2 degrees or whatever even after I briefed when I'll start heading down. Seriously what's up with that?! When they do that I avoid it and descend at a different angle. Run some numbers in your head and quite relying on the damn fms.
#9050
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,931
Last I heard was class sizes have been reduced because of the training backlog. Sounds reasonable, or its a cover up for the lack of interest/lack of available pilots. Who knows. Captain upgrades are waiting 6 weeks for ioe, FOs 8 weeks. We recently lost 4 check airman to mainline carriers which is a sizeable contingent for a smaller airline. 2 to United, 1 to UPS and I forget the last one.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post