Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Union Talk
Jetblue and ALPA election >

Jetblue and ALPA election


Notices
Union Talk For macro-level discussion: legislation, national unions, organizing pilot groups, etc.
For airline-specific discussion, use relevant forum above.

Jetblue and ALPA election

Old 07-03-2011 | 07:39 PM
  #71  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: 73 capt
Default

SWA Captain

w-2 2010 $317,000 Total days at work 142 All training and DH included
Not check airman, just working the system.

Yes average captain makes 230,000 Reserve pays 215,000 for a captain picking up nada(nothing)

One other correction, when SWAPA started it started with no funds from the company, all the pilots were volunteers and not paid a dime for their time. The president donated the his house for meetings and stationary.
Reply
Old 07-03-2011 | 07:55 PM
  #72  
Carl Spakler's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Default

I agree with your points about the DAL pilots needing a big pay raise. FWIW, a quick google search of these keywords "Southwest Pilots contract 2001" returned this old headline. It doesn't precisely answer your question but I think it does show SWAPA was using ALPA negotiated rates as justification for their pay demands:

July 04, 2002|By NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE
Disagreement over pay remains unresolved. The union, the Southwest Airlines Pilots' Association, argued that pilots at Delta Air Lines, for example, earned about $244 an hour flying Boeing 737 jets, which make up Southwest's entire fleet. A Southwest pilot, the union said, earns about $140 an hour.

Pay parity was the key platform plank for the current group of union leaders, who were elected in 2000 on a pledge to win significant raises. With elections again scheduled in September, the pilots' union sought to resume contract talks this spring, but in a much different competitive atmosphere.

Though Southwest was profitable in 2001 and is likely to remain so, Cordle estimates that Southwest's revenue will decline 12 percent this year. Over the past 20 years, the airline's revenue has increased an average 14 percent annually.

In his latest offer to the union, Parker proposed an extension of the current contract by two years, through 2006, and raises totaling 35 percent over the next four years. But that deal did not bring the union close to the levels at other airlines. After a 27-hour meeting last month, the union's board deadlocked on recommending the offer to the pilots.

"As a matter of principle, I think we can do better," said Jonathan Weaks, president of Southwest's pilots union. The union leaders said they nonetheless sent the offer to the members for a vote because they thought that the pilots should have a chance to express their opinions directly. Weaks said he favored a complete overhaul of the contract.


Analysts say Parker can afford to pay Southwest's pilots the same rates as at other airlines, given the carrier's financial strength and labor productivity. Southwest pilots, for example, fly an average of 80 to 90 hours a month, compared with about 50 hours a month at other major airlines.


Southwest also can turn planes around more quickly than its competitors, and its maintenance costs are lower because it focuses on just one type of aircraft. Its low fares attract budget-conscious fliers.


Southwest wants to do everything it can to protect that advantage, said Cordle. Union officials, he maintained, are accustomed to the company's history of friendly relationships and to the idea that employees' compensation is tied to the company's financial success and will not press Southwest for the last penny.


Southwest pilots' vote on contract begins - Page 2 - Baltimore Sun

Last edited by Carl Spakler; 07-03-2011 at 08:30 PM.
Reply
Old 07-03-2011 | 09:05 PM
  #73  
alvrb211's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by windrider
over and out...i've said all i want to say about it. guess we'll see what the majority wants and if that's what they want then i would love to be proved wrong on my positions.
Your arguments are beyond weak.


JJ
Reply
Old 07-04-2011 | 03:10 AM
  #74  
alvrb211's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
So you received pay raises, but you went backwards? Why? Because you lost some premium pay? You shouldn't have to rely on premium pay for your income. Personally, I hate extra flying. I want as much $$$ for as little work possible.

There's no shortage of guys at B6 trying to pick up extra flying to make up for the shortfall in their compensation. They are like lab rats hitting the feeder bar for food pellets unaware that they've been had.


JJ
Reply
Old 07-04-2011 | 05:00 AM
  #75  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
TWA & Midwest are hardly all the other ALPA carriers.
Just well known examples.

Actually, if you want a better example of ALPA's hideous faliure across the board, one only need to look at the RJ which single-handedly destroyed the profession. From its inception where it should have been controlled to its expansion where it should have been included, they not ony botched that from stem to stern, but aggrivate that faliure consistantly even now.

Those clowns could f&%# up a cup of coffee.
Reply
Old 07-04-2011 | 05:09 AM
  #76  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by golfandfly
TWA was a failing carrier and merged with a non ALPA carrier. Not sure they could do much for them. NWA had a better merger with Delta. They are never perfect, ask anyone and they'll probably tell you that they got screwed. But, in reality, it was as about as good as you can get.

Sorry I don't know what ALPA was supposed to do for Midwest. Would an independent union have helped?

Would you rather pay low end workers 100K/year? Aren't they supposed to keep salaries (that we all pay) in check?

Again, I am no huge fan of ALPA. I do see them as the best alternative.
.....and another impressionable young lad bellies up to the good humor truck with dreams and fantasies. They'll do nothing more for you then a good in-house union will, except strip you of more money to support their bloated lifestyles.

Working for an airline and having ALPA on the property is like living on a block with two bullies. One jacks you up everyday and the other promises to be there to protect you for a portion of your lunch money, but rarely seem to be around when you need them most and in time you'll learn this.

It's just a suggestion, but I think a toasted almond or bomb pop isn't the best choice for you. Ask the guy in the musical truck for a dreamsicle...........I think you'll find it more to your liking.
Reply
Old 07-04-2011 | 05:24 AM
  #77  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by aewanabe
Eaglefly, ALPA got you a seat at AA without an interview. I don't have a problem with that, but it's odd for you to tell us how much we don't need ALPA when you fail to manage what it has done for you. I don't know any of us, myself included, that view ALPA as a panacea. But it's clear that management has absolutely zero intent to treat our PEAs or the PVC with any of our "integrity" value, and we need a voice in our careers.
ALPA botched that just as badly as they have everything else. For the record, ALPA got about 130 Eagle pilots AA jobs during the first 14 years of that agreement, while the APA got about 400 or so at Eagle. The Eagle pilots started at the bottom of the total list, while the AA furloughees started at the bottom of the captains list. ALPA got a "D-" for their flowthru negotiating abilities. The only thing worse, was their policing of the agreement, where they get an "F". No sour grapes, because that was the agreement........actually, my hats off to the APA for a job well done on that one.

A 16-year contract that the fat guy from national (food stained tie and all) held over his head and proclaimed the best thing since sliced bread and a series of amendment rounds that slowly gave back many of the palatable parts of the CBA was what ALPA "managed to do for me"..........oh, that and a $32,000 magazine subscription and an occasional reminder to pay or face termination when they botched my dues payment.

Believe what you wish. If another group of suckers falls down the same hole as so many of us have who have the bumps and bruises to prove it want to experience it for themselves, I say go for it. You'll never be allowed to strike though as ALPA can't give you that (just like all the other ALPA carriers who've been in negotiations for years and wont be released to self-help). The actual ability to strike is the only thing that gets true results and ALPA has no juice anymore and is simply now a dues collection business attempting to support itself as its primary priority.

The difficult part is making it LOOK like they're actually doing something for you. Thankfully, I'm done with that forever, but I can still watch with amusement from the sidelines as the frustration of others who actually WANT to experience this for themselves when they don't get what they thought they would.
Reply
Old 07-04-2011 | 06:08 AM
  #78  
Fins Up's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Passed out in my hammock
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
... You'll never be allowed to strike though as ALPA can't give you that (just like all the other ALPA carriers who've been in negotiations for years and wont be released to self-help). The actual ability to strike is the only thing that gets true results and ALPA has no juice anymore and is simply now a dues collection business attempting to support itself as its primary priority.
.....Spirit?.....
Reply
Old 07-04-2011 | 06:51 AM
  #79  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Are you implying the Delta Express had an organized sickout campaign going on? Because the data doesn't support that. Yes, they used greenslips, just like SWA uses overtime to get to their "average" pay.

I note that you didn't answer the question. Is it W-2 or wage rates? B-scale or not?

Honestly slow, I wasnt avoiding your question, I just didnt take it as a real question.

Wage rates combined with work rule determine contract value. Seniority on equipment determines the individuals ability to exercise the work rules to maximize his income or quality of life choice.

Mean w-2 is a useful comparison metric. It takes into account broad behavior patterns based upon work rules.

I dont know what you mean by B scale or not. If you mean was express a b scale, I would say it was a c scale with different work rules that was bid in seniority order. This answer isnt meant to avert your question, but it is my viewpoint that every system seeks equilibrium.

If we had C-172s that paid $400/hour and 747-400s that paid $100/hour, I think the cessna would generally go senior to the 747.
Reply
Old 07-04-2011 | 06:54 AM
  #80  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by 73sw
SWA Captain

w-2 2010 $317,000 Total days at work 142 All training and DH included
Not check airman, just working the system.

Yes average captain makes 230,000 Reserve pays 215,000 for a captain picking up nada(nothing)

One other correction, when SWAPA started it started with no funds from the company, all the pilots were volunteers and not paid a dime for their time. The president donated the his house for meetings and stationary.

IOW Sailing doesnt know what he is talking about.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
superduck
Union Talk
420
06-20-2011 10:00 PM
Harry Canyon
Major
106
03-16-2011 07:43 PM
iahflyr
Regional
44
01-17-2008 10:58 AM
Fly4Beer
JetBlue
22
04-09-2007 12:07 PM
fireman0174
Major
46
11-19-2006 05:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices