Search

Notices
View Poll Results: T/A Vote Yes or No
Yes
50
9.38%
No
483
90.62%
Voters: 533. You may not vote on this poll

Yes or No

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2022 | 11:08 PM
  #401  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 43
From: Gear slinger
Default

Originally Posted by Gooselives
but it does not exceed. We still end up with higher pay rates etc etc
Total value is $2 Bil for AA vs $1.2-1.6 Bil to UAL. Higher pay rate % gains and far less concessions.
Reply
Old 07-08-2022 | 05:17 AM
  #402  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 15
Default

AA’s proposal is irrelevant for United I’m sure United management would offer us AA’s current contract plus AA’s current offer in a heartbeat. It would save the company lots of money over United’s current TA.
Reply
Old 07-08-2022 | 05:22 AM
  #403  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD
a lot of it is self inflicted and inherent to the seniority system
Or better yet, get rid of seniority all together. The best pilots go to the best carriers. If your carrier gets worse over time, change carriers without going to bottom of some arbitrary list. Current airline suddenly closes your base? Leave for an airline where you can live in base. Have one pay rate for FO’s and one rate for captains regardless of YOS. Get rid of seniority and we can be like almost every other profession in terms of mobility.
Reply
Old 07-08-2022 | 05:27 AM
  #404  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
If we're going to "run the act" as it's said in the business, then we need to be prepared with some patience as that takes time. There are 2 groups at the table, and both can run pieces and parts of the RLA. It's designed to be slow and inefficient so that at the end of the day, hopefully, cooler heads prevail.

The key is to make management think they have more to gain in the short term by negotiating with us with honor, integrity, and in good faith and in return they can have a great and profitable Thanksgiving and Christmas. Not to worry about summer, they already bought themselves a peaceful and uneventful summer just by negotiating the TA, as crapp-ey as it was.

You must convince management via an information war that you mean business and that it will be cheaper, more convenient, and result in less embarrassment to both government oversight and the traveling public to meet our "reasonable demands." We must be perceived as "reasonable". That being said, my level of reasonableness may be different from yours.

The MEC left the pilots behind in this TA, and management knows it. The information war can only be a rouse, unless ALPA gets its act together. Strike committees, etc. And a direct marketing campaign to the BOD, government, and public must occur. Quickly....

The RLA does provide strong leverage, but it will take a while. Lots of LEC/MEC change-overs will happen in order to run the act. At the end of the day, it is only as strong as your willingness to strike. Consider that please. Don't answer it, but consider it.
👍👍

We're about to find out if Kirby really needs us on board to achieve his United Next goals. I 'think' he does... but I wouldn't bet much $$ on that.

The RLA provides the legal framework and we should immediately (post TA vote) tell/show everyone that we are choosing the path of maximum pressure - even though we know it's a long path. The change in the nature & tenor of the pilot-management relationship will be noticed and reported on immediately. Our leadership needs to be vocal about this change in a professional but firm way. Along with that we'll need to conduct every legal action to demonstrate that we are serious and committed to getting the right contract.

The RLA provides the legal opportunity to threaten a strike - which is powerful. Taking definitive action to prove that we will go that direction will, IMO, yield near term results due to this critical point in executing strategic plans. At a minimum we need to replace several LEC reps, replace Mike Hamilton, replace the NC (& some SMEs), and then get OUR house in order and present a comprehensive list of 'must haves' & red lines to the company, They will never take us seriously if the same NC members return to the table. Similarly, Kirby and the BOD need to see a different MC in order to understand that we are changing our tactics.

In true pilot fashion our biggest challenge will be to not shoot ourselves in the foot. Beware the opportunists and flamethrowers who tell us what we want to hear! We need smart, clear eyed, and reasonable leaders who know how to tell UNITED what we want them to hear.
Reply
Old 07-08-2022 | 06:08 AM
  #405  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: 756 Left Side
Default

Originally Posted by WhisperJet
more and more guys I’m talking to lately leaning YES. Reasons: only a couple years left; last contract they’ll see; recession; etc etc
Interesting.. also talking to others. The 2 who are over 60 have both voted NO, and a bunch in the 55-60 range (myself included) also Voted NO. It's what you think you're Worth, what you think the Profession is Worth, and What we are Owed- (for OUR pain having to wait almost 4 years past due)

FS, FP & FtC
Always
Motch
Reply
Old 07-08-2022 | 06:10 AM
  #406  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 761
Likes: 52
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
Or better yet, get rid of seniority all together. The best pilots go to the best carriers. If your carrier gets worse over time, change carriers without going to bottom of some arbitrary list. Current airline suddenly closes your base? Leave for an airline where you can live in base. Have one pay rate for FO’s and one rate for captains regardless of YOS. Get rid of seniority and we can be like almost every other profession in terms of mobility.
Brilliant plan!!

So every winter when airlines are overstaffed you get laid off or fired. Then when economy goes south, definitely getting laid off or fired. So now you're a seasonal employee.
Reply
Old 07-08-2022 | 06:10 AM
  #407  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Aquaticus
I am sticking with my prediction of 70/30 no with a 85% turnout. I am hoping for a stronger no but we have people that can't math good and the Marvin's.
We need a 90/10 NO vote to shock the hell out of both ALPA and the company. Only then will we get a deal we deserve and not this BS wrapped in monkey dung.
Reply
Old 07-08-2022 | 06:19 AM
  #408  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: SFO Guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27
Interesting.. also talking to others. The 2 who are over 60 have both voted NO, and a bunch in the 55-60 range (myself included) also Voted NO. It's what you think you're Worth, what you think the Profession is Worth, and What we are Owed- (for OUR pain having to wait almost 4 years past due)

FS, FP & FtC
Always
Motch
I have only talked to one pilot that was even thinking about voting “yes”. He cited short duration and the whole bird in the hand thing because of the upcoming recession. Many of the half wingers that I’ve flown with since the Tumi TA was released have basically begged me to vote “no” because they don’t want to be stuck digging out of the hole that this TA puts them in. So that’s a good sign!?!?

With regard to the AA proposal, all that proves is that our NC and MEC have left hundreds of millions of dollars on the table.

VOTE NO, then let the recall hunger games begin!!!
Reply
Old 07-08-2022 | 06:22 AM
  #409  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: SFO Guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Mytime2025
We need a 90/10 NO vote to shock the hell out of both ALPA and the company. Only then will we get a deal we deserve and not this BS wrapped in monkey dung.
Here, here!!! Channeling my inner Bill Rafferty…. We need to send it back “with authority”!!!
Reply
Old 07-08-2022 | 06:34 AM
  #410  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
Or better yet, get rid of seniority all together. The best pilots go to the best carriers. If your carrier gets worse over time, change carriers without going to bottom of some arbitrary list. Current airline suddenly closes your base? Leave for an airline where you can live in base. Have one pay rate for FO’s and one rate for captains regardless of YOS. Get rid of seniority and we can be like almost every other profession in terms of mobility.
" Arbitrary list " just like 65 is an arbitrary age ? Amazing the the self serving attitude of pilots. First you are against raising retirement age for everyone that extends your career ( only if you choose to keep working).or at a minimum your LTD ( do the mathe at 68 its 550k tax free) window but now you want my seniority. Unbelievable. We really are our own worst enemy. After listening to the crap and mamby pamby garbage on this forum I'm almost ready to cheer on that this turd passes and we will deserve what we get because so many are not willing to fight for anything. Just bury you head in the sand and go back to playing with all you toys and bragging about how big your house is. Then I get to fly with everybody denying they voted yes , seen it 100 times. Just marvelous " give up seniority" , "one pay rate" really? Y
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices