Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Dont land like its the sim >

Dont land like its the sim

Search
Notices

Dont land like its the sim

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2018, 01:09 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
Default

Word on the street is that after the U2, the MD-11 / DC-10 are the hardest planes to land. Those skinny wings don’t give you much room for error.
C130driver is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 01:23 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 839
Default

Originally Posted by C130driver View Post
Word on the street is that after the U2, the MD-11 / DC-10 are the hardest planes to land. Those skinny wings don’t give you much room for error.
The 67 isn’t hard to land. It’s just not the easiest to grease on.
jdt30 is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 03:28 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,708
Default

Originally Posted by jdt30 View Post
The 67 isn’t hard to land. It’s just not the easiest to grease on.

I got pretty good with it, but its definitely a different beast to land than the 757.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 06:31 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
Default

Originally Posted by joepilot View Post
NOT on the 727.

Joe
There were three different techniques to landing the 727.............and none of them worked.

The B727....where we are all passengers during the last 3 feet.
FL370esq is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 07:30 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by C130driver View Post
Word on the street is that after the U2, the MD-11 / DC-10 are the hardest planes to land.
Never flew the DC-10, but I did wrench on it and I've never heard anyone say it was difficult to land, though I think FedEx has gone through a few on landing accidents. The MD-11, OTOH, I've heard is an absolute beast that demands your full attention, particularly in gusty winds. I'd like to hear a FedEx pilot's opinion. I think I heard it was related to the size of the horizontal stab.
XHooker is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 07:33 PM
  #26  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq View Post
There were three different techniques to landing the 727.............and none of them worked.

The B727....where we are all passengers during the last 3 feet.

Truth!! Had a Captain tell me "The day you think you have finally figured it out...is the day it will bite you in the a$$...." Thankfully, I never dropped the rubber-jungle.

Hoss, for me, just the opposite: I find the 767-300 is the easiest to land airliner I've ever flown, especially in a 5-kt crosswind. 757-200? Stick forces get too high in the flare. 757-300 a lot easier than the -200, but I haven't flown it (or the 767-400) in more than two years.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 07:38 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble View Post
I know nothing about the 764, but landing with power is an almost sure fire way to bang the tail on the uberbuppy.
I think TK has gone overboard on this. The statistics say you're right, yet the two pilots I've flown with who said they were on 900ERs that banged the tails both landed power off. One hit hard and one was slow and when the spoilers extended on landing, the nose pitched up another three degrees. LSS, don't have power on, but don't chop the power and begin to flare at 20 feet or hesitate to add power with an in close sinker because TK scared the kaka out of you about landing power on.
XHooker is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 08:05 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
I’ve got a grand total of one landing in a 767-400. The 300 quite a few more. On a 300 you want to hold the power in until the bitter end. Either that or add a couple of kts to your target speed.
Oy ve. Pick up a copy of Stick and rudder. Pay attention to the part about angle of attack.

Btw, the brakes on the 763 are the worst I've seen since the DC-10 -10. Just another reason not to carry extra speed/ power.
BMEP100 is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 08:18 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 169
Default

Yes if you land slow, the 737-9ER will definitely pitch up when the spoilers deploy.
Deafguppy is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 09:13 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,708
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100 View Post
Oy ve. Pick up a copy of Stick and rudder. Pay attention to the part about angle of attack.

Btw, the brakes on the 763 are the worst I've seen since the DC-10 -10. Just another reason not to carry extra speed/ power.
I’m guessing you don’t play well with others?

BTW anytime you want to have a flying contest, let me know. I can set that up.
Airhoss is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SVA402
Regional
45
01-16-2014 06:05 AM
SongMan
Flight Schools and Training
16
08-23-2013 06:49 PM
BeardedFlyer
Regional
47
03-20-2013 04:49 AM
crflyer
Regional
13
07-30-2012 11:06 PM
seamonster
Major
52
06-08-2012 06:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices