B767 300 pay
08-20-2018, 09:36 PM
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 292
Originally Posted by baseball
Well we don't have either the 380 or the 747 on property....
But, the 777, 767-400, and 787 all seem to pay the same per hour, NO?...….
But, the 777, 767-400, and 787 all seem to pay the same per hour, NO?...….
How can you say an AC that comes in at less than half the weight of the 747 that we had when contract was signed should pay the same?
767-400 paid the same as a 747 and 777, ridiculous.
not all wide bodies are equal, and the same is true for narrow bodies. Are you fighting for those too to all pay the same rate?
the 757 pays the same as a guppy and what a C100?
08-21-2018, 05:02 AM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Originally Posted by O2pilot
One legacy demanded the pay rates in such a way to support an SLI argument. That answers most of those questions.
JB/JP represented that legacy that started with C and wasn’t China Airlines.
08-21-2018, 05:38 AM
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
Our pay banding the way it is currently constructed is asinine. The 767-400 should not pay what a 777 pays (definitely not the 747). I think airplanes should be tiered this way.
1. 777-300 (747-8 should also be included)
2. 777-200, 787-10 & -9, and 767-400
3. 767-300, 787-8
4. 757, Guppy Maximus -10
5. Fifi, Guppy
Just my $0.02
1. 777-300 (747-8 should also be included)
2. 777-200, 787-10 & -9, and 767-400
3. 767-300, 787-8
4. 757, Guppy Maximus -10
5. Fifi, Guppy
Just my $0.02
08-21-2018, 06:32 AM
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
Originally Posted by DashTrash
Our pay banding the way it is currently constructed is asinine. The 767-400 should not pay what a 777 pays (definitely not the 747). I think airplanes should be tiered this way.
1. 777-300 (747-8 should also be included)
2. 777-200, 787-10 & -9, and 767-400
3. 767-300, 787-8
4. 757, Guppy Maximus -10
5. Fifi, Guppy
Just my $0.02
1. 777-300 (747-8 should also be included)
2. 777-200, 787-10 & -9, and 767-400
3. 767-300, 787-8
4. 757, Guppy Maximus -10
5. Fifi, Guppy
Just my $0.02
08-21-2018, 06:58 AM
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,544
I’m glad to see mostly people see how dumb it is that the 767-400 is banded at the highest pay band.
I don’t see the issue in “bringing down the 767-400” as long as it “brings up” the rate for the 757 and 767-300. If we have 5x as many 757/767-300 as we do 767-400, then I would be happy bringing up the 757/767 rate $1 for every $5 we bring down the 767-400 until the pay rates converge. Overall pilot compensation stays the same. That’s what we care about.
Keep paybanding simple.
737 and Airbus 320 series
757 and 767
777 and 787
Less time pilots have to spend in training. Less money the company has to spend on training. More profit for our profit sharing checks. More profit that gives us leverage for a stronger contract overall.
I don’t see the issue in “bringing down the 767-400” as long as it “brings up” the rate for the 757 and 767-300. If we have 5x as many 757/767-300 as we do 767-400, then I would be happy bringing up the 757/767 rate $1 for every $5 we bring down the 767-400 until the pay rates converge. Overall pilot compensation stays the same. That’s what we care about.
Keep paybanding simple.
737 and Airbus 320 series
757 and 767
777 and 787
Less time pilots have to spend in training. Less money the company has to spend on training. More profit for our profit sharing checks. More profit that gives us leverage for a stronger contract overall.
08-21-2018, 07:07 AM
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,825
Originally Posted by iahflyr
I’m glad to see mostly people see how dumb it is that the 767-400 is banded at the highest pay band.
I don’t see the issue in “bringing down the 767-400” as long as it “brings up” the rate for the 757 and 767-300. If we have 5x as many 757/767-300 as we do 767-400, then I would be happy bringing up the 757/767 rate $1 for every $5 we bring down the 767-400 until the pay rates converge. Overall pilot compensation stays the same. That’s what we care about.
Keep paybanding simple.
737 and Airbus 320 series
757 and 767
777 and 787
Less time pilots have to spend in training. Less money the company has to spend on training. More profit for our profit sharing checks. More profit that gives us leverage for a stronger contract overall.
I don’t see the issue in “bringing down the 767-400” as long as it “brings up” the rate for the 757 and 767-300. If we have 5x as many 757/767-300 as we do 767-400, then I would be happy bringing up the 757/767 rate $1 for every $5 we bring down the 767-400 until the pay rates converge. Overall pilot compensation stays the same. That’s what we care about.
Keep paybanding simple.
737 and Airbus 320 series
757 and 767
777 and 787
Less time pilots have to spend in training. Less money the company has to spend on training. More profit for our profit sharing checks. More profit that gives us leverage for a stronger contract overall.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
