Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
19-02 Out later today.  Crew Resources update >

19-02 Out later today. Crew Resources update

Search
Notices

19-02 Out later today. Crew Resources update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-2018, 03:39 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by Terrain Inop View Post
UAL recently named the A350 fleet program manager as the A320 program manager. I wouldn't read between the lines too much, but I think it's a significant impact as to the viability of the A350 program at UAL.

I wasn't aware that we had an A 350 program at UAL.

I think's it's a "ghost program." Reminds me of how well the USAF hid the F-117 leading up to Desert Storm. Sure, we've got a program manager, but this guy has the best job in town.

Office at 830. Coffee, email check up

Make the rounds at 9 am say howdy, make some social calls

Log into net flix and download favorite movie. watch til lunch time

Go have lunch off campus back by 2pm

fly the simulator from 2 to 3 to maintain proficiency

3pm cartoons, snack, and nap

4:30 time to head home

My friends at ICE tell me this is sorta what they were doing during Obama years.
8:30 office
9:00 Net Flix
11:00 lunch
1:00 work out
3:00 Net Flix
430 go home
baseball is offline  
Old 09-16-2018, 06:47 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: B-737 Captain
Posts: 649
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100 View Post
I'm not sure, but..
Don't forget USAirways (Phl) and AMR (DAL)
Blasphemy!! American Airlines is headquartered in Ft. Worth, TX. That is all. Carry on.
guppie is offline  
Old 09-16-2018, 08:33 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
Default

Originally Posted by baseball View Post
I wasn't aware that we had an A 350 program at UAL.

I think's it's a "ghost program." Reminds me of how well the USAF hid the F-117 leading up to Desert Storm. Sure, we've got a program manager, but this guy has the best job in town.

Office at 830. Coffee, email check up

Make the rounds at 9 am say howdy, make some social calls

Log into net flix and download favorite movie. watch til lunch time

Go have lunch off campus back by 2pm

fly the simulator from 2 to 3 to maintain proficiency

3pm cartoons, snack, and nap

4:30 time to head home

My friends at ICE tell me this is sorta what they were doing during Obama years.
8:30 office
9:00 Net Flix
11:00 lunch
1:00 work out
3:00 Net Flix
430 go home
Go to TK, 350 stuff is popping up.
Grumble is offline  
Old 09-16-2018, 10:04 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 783
Default

If you look at that seat/range chart that was posted earlier it kind of makes the case for the 350 on paper. The 777-2 are getting old and the 777X is too big, the 350-1000 is too big and too little range, and 78-10 is too little range 78-9 is too small. The closest airplane to the range and seat count to the old 777-200 is the 350-9. The costs of an added fleet might lead them to persue the 777-x which would be great for us. You need a lot more mainline passengers to fill a 360 seat airplane vs a 285.
Aquaticus is offline  
Old 09-16-2018, 05:16 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 634
Default

Originally Posted by Aquaticus View Post
If you look at that seat/range chart that was posted earlier it kind of makes the case for the 350 on paper. The 777-2 are getting old and the 777X is too big, the 350-1000 is too big and too little range, and 78-10 is too little range 78-9 is too small. The closest airplane to the range and seat count to the old 777-200 is the 350-9. The costs of an added fleet might lead them to persue the 777-x which would be great for us. You need a lot more mainline passengers to fill a 360 seat airplane vs a 285.
Umm just to nitpick but the range of the 350-1000 is not too little as compared to the 777-200er. Airbus lists its range at 8400nm

Cathay just started HKG-IAD with the 350-1000 (334 seats)

https://www.businesstraveller.com/bu...bus-a350-1000/
C11DCA is offline  
Old 09-16-2018, 05:31 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by guppie View Post
Blasphemy!! American Airlines is headquartered in Ft. Worth, TX. That is all. Carry on.
They claim Ft. Worth, but it’s actually the ****ty part of north Grand Prairie
awax is offline  
Old 09-16-2018, 06:33 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Viperstick's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 280
Default

Originally Posted by ChalupaBatman View Post
Yet another punch in the nuts for ORD. God forbid we ever get some more WB flying, or a 787 base. But hey, good for EWR & SFO


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This ought to be good for 6-9 more pages...

Have heard after EWR gets their 78s, ORD is next. No definite timeline mentioned.
Viperstick is offline  
Old 09-16-2018, 06:52 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 783
Default

Originally Posted by C11DCA View Post
Umm just to nitpick but the range of the 350-1000 is not too little as compared to the 777-200er. Airbus lists its range at 8400nm

Cathay just started HKG-IAD with the 350-1000 (334 seats)

https://www.businesstraveller.com/bu...bus-a350-1000/
Veritas: Range of A350, 787 and 777x according to United Airlines

This is the chart from a United powerpoint third quarter of 2017. The 1000 has less range than the 900 but too many seats. See how closely the 777-2 and 350-9 are on the chart. If they were looking for a square peg for a square hole. Thats all I was pointing out. It is all semantics really they are all cool airplanes.
Aquaticus is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 02:31 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: B-737 Captain
Posts: 649
Default

Originally Posted by awax View Post
They claim Ft. Worth, but it’s actually the ****ty part of north Grand Prairie
Negative. Thanks to the ARM!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_W...ighlighted.svg
guppie is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 06:17 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 101
Default

Originally Posted by awax View Post
BS! Air Travel options? gimme a break. How about $41 million in tax and other incentives over 20 years. Denver and Dallas didn't pony up the dollars, but were finalist. If air travel options were at play, Denver never would have made the list. Follow the money.

As the then CEO said....
Companies these days are also very concerned about attracting talent. Chicago has world-class culture, beautiful, walkable neighborhooods, an extensive public transportation system, amazing lakefront parks and beaches, and a cost of living that is a fraction of New York or Los Angeles.

Many large companies are actually moving their offices out of the suburbs and back into Chicago because new college graduates want to live in diverse, progressive, urban, culturally rich places. I know Denver and Dallas both have their share of these qualities, but nowhere near the scale it exists in Chicago.

When you combine all of that with tax incentives, central location, and a worldwide aviation hub like ORD it is not surprising at all that Chicago would be a desirable place for a corporate HQ.
lukeh99 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bluedriver
JetBlue
51
09-04-2017 09:45 AM
Days Off
FedEx
56
10-19-2015 08:06 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
forgot to bid
Hangar Talk
5
07-25-2010 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices