Shocked by a new hire's view on scope.
10-31-2018, 01:10 PM
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 488
Originally Posted by Galaxy5
God I cringe when I walk into the crew room, meet my CA for the next 4 days and see that ring. I like finding out on day 2 that a guy is a grad, because that means he’s probably letting his work speak for him and not some rolled mold of gems and gold.
Favorite line so far when it comes out that I’m also one of them “well my son, wife, uncle, brother in law, father and dog are grads and we all wear our rings and give to the endowment! You need to take pride in the institution that’s given you so much!”
It’s like they’re out to make the entire group look bad.
Favorite line so far when it comes out that I’m also one of them “well my son, wife, uncle, brother in law, father and dog are grads and we all wear our rings and give to the endowment! You need to take pride in the institution that’s given you so much!”
It’s like they’re out to make the entire group look bad.
You meet in the crew room?
10-31-2018, 05:11 PM
#68
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Originally Posted by SUX4U
Where do you meet your flying partner on day one?
Old. “Should. Indicates a preferred but not mandatory method of accomplishment.”
New. "Should. Indicates actions that are expected. If the “should” expectation cannot be met, there must be a compelling reason."
Future. "Should. Indicates actions that are really, really expected. If the “should” expectation cannot be met, you “may” refer to definition of “must, shall, will.”
Last edited by APC225; 10-31-2018 at 05:25 PM.
10-31-2018, 06:13 PM
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 488
Originally Posted by APC225
I have to give them credit for not giving it up eight years in.
Old. “Should. Indicates a preferred but not mandatory method of accomplishment.”
New. "Should. Indicates actions that are expected. If the “should” expectation cannot be met, there must be a compelling reason."
Future. "Should. Indicates actions that are really, really expected. If the “should” expectation cannot be met, you “may” refer to definition of “must, shall, will.”
Old. “Should. Indicates a preferred but not mandatory method of accomplishment.”
New. "Should. Indicates actions that are expected. If the “should” expectation cannot be met, there must be a compelling reason."
Future. "Should. Indicates actions that are really, really expected. If the “should” expectation cannot be met, you “may” refer to definition of “must, shall, will.”
No kidding...I mean what are these guys still wearing legacy wings thinking....
10-31-2018, 08:42 PM
#70
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
Originally Posted by elmetal
So you think when one regional says no to a ****ty contract that the flying doesn't then get sent to another ****ty regional?
Have you been following the American wholly owned charade? Or maybe you are more following the UAX charade, guess what, the flying got all taken from XJT (good contract) and given to TSA/Mesa/Republic/Skywest.
That's how it works in the regional industry, you take the garbage or you lose the flying, PERIOD. The only way to get the flying back from regionals is through your CBA, not hoping and praying that everyone will say no in the regionals. Because if they do, guess what happens? Remember when TSA said no to a garbage contract in exchange for crj700s? Yeah they literally created a new airline, GoJet.
NOTHING will change unless it is from the top. Stop blaming the pilots that are in the mess YOU (categorical legacy you, not you personally) created.
Have you been following the American wholly owned charade? Or maybe you are more following the UAX charade, guess what, the flying got all taken from XJT (good contract) and given to TSA/Mesa/Republic/Skywest.
That's how it works in the regional industry, you take the garbage or you lose the flying, PERIOD. The only way to get the flying back from regionals is through your CBA, not hoping and praying that everyone will say no in the regionals. Because if they do, guess what happens? Remember when TSA said no to a garbage contract in exchange for crj700s? Yeah they literally created a new airline, GoJet.
NOTHING will change unless it is from the top. Stop blaming the pilots that are in the mess YOU (categorical legacy you, not you personally) created.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
