Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Shocked by a new hire's view on scope. >

Shocked by a new hire's view on scope.

Search
Notices

Shocked by a new hire's view on scope.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2018, 09:35 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
elmetal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Default

Originally Posted by ChrisJT6 View Post
it is the fault of the pilots with few exceptions for continuing to vote for weak contracts to knowingly take dangled planes and routes from another union RJ carrier as part of the signing deal.
The flying is already outsourced. as to WHO is doing the outsourced flying is completely irrelevant. The fact of the matter is the more you allow it to leave, the less control you have.


To outsource flying via regionals/scope, and then have the audacity to want to blame the RJ pilots who are flying it, is absolutely ridiculous.

Those RJ pilots want nothing more than to be at mainline. Do you think people enjoy doing more work for 1/4 of the money? The more flying you "give away" the longer people will spend at regionals.


You sound like the type of cat who wants UAL pilots above UAX on UAX flights. You gave the flying away, and everything that goes with it. Can't have your cake and eat it too, sorry.
elmetal is offline  
Old 10-31-2018, 09:48 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by Zoomie View Post
As a former "zoomie" with the screen name to follow it, I think it's shallow for the OP to paint with such a broad brush.

, , ,

Time and again I find the internet and short posts end up creating the wrong message. I was not implying all Zoomies would agree; in fact I believe a person with a 20 year career leading men around the world in difficult situations is completely entitled to hold and voice opinions, and I respect him immensely for being willing to voice his opinion and discuss the issue without becoming hysterical. I welcome the experience and thoughtfulness that retired miltary pilots bring to the cockpit. In my limited experience as a captain, I wold much rather have an experienced 48 year old that is unphased by lightening, speed limit excesses, or frivilous ECAM's versus an overly nervous 28 year old that feels a need to file an FSAP for every missed radio call.

I honestly thought no pilot anywhere could support easing Scope so this caught me a bit by surprise, and that was what prompted me to post. I did not mean to denigrate Zoomies.
Sunvox is offline  
Old 10-31-2018, 10:06 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,671
Default

Originally Posted by Zoomie View Post
As a former "zoomie" with the screen name to follow it, I think it's shallow for the OP to paint with such a broad brush.
It seems as if the OP referenced a SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL, and not an entire group/wasn’t painting with a broad brush.

And if he flew an entire trip with him, probably heard it more than once.

You want to see paining with a broad brush? What this.....

“You know how you know you’re flying with a “zoomie”? They’ll tell you, REPEATEDLY”
John Carr is offline  
Old 10-31-2018, 10:28 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
Default

Originally Posted by elmetal View Post
The flying is already outsourced. as to WHO is doing the outsourced flying is completely irrelevant. The fact of the matter is the more you allow it to leave, the less control you have.


To outsource flying via regionals/scope, and then have the audacity to want to blame the RJ pilots who are flying it, is absolutely ridiculous.

Those RJ pilots want nothing more than to be at mainline. Do you think people enjoy doing more work for 1/4 of the money? The more flying you "give away" the longer people will spend at regionals.


You sound like the type of cat who wants UAL pilots above UAX on UAX flights. You gave the flying away, and everything that goes with it. Can't have your cake and eat it too, sorry.
Great info. Our exchange had little to do with why the flying was outsourced.
It was to summarize about a poor generalization about military guys and a whine about how helpless RJ guys that have been “whipsawed” are not responsible for there poor contracts and participating in the circle of screw of their fellow RJ pilots...I call bull on who needs to look in the labor mirror.
As for all that other stuff you pulled out...you might check your chip light. You sound like the type CAT that causes United to spend loads of cash (LEAP) so the rest of could figure out how to deal this new generation.

Last edited by ChrisJT6; 10-31-2018 at 10:38 AM.
ChrisJT6 is offline  
Old 10-31-2018, 10:33 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
elmetal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Default

Originally Posted by ChrisJT6 View Post
Great info. Our exchange had little to do with why the flying was outsourced.
It was to summarize about a poor generalization about military guys and an whine about how helpless RJ guys that have been “whipsawed” are not responsible for there poor contracts and participating in the circle of screw of their fellow RJ pilots...I call bull on who needs to look in the labor mirror.
As for all that other stuff you pulled out...you might check your chip light. You sound like the type CAT that causes United to spend loads of cash (LEAP) so the rest of could figure out how to deal this new generation.
Don't backpedal, you blamed the RJ pilots for undercutting each other, as if that somehow has any effect on the flying not coming back to mainline. stop kidding yourself
elmetal is offline  
Old 10-31-2018, 10:45 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
Default

Originally Posted by elmetal View Post
Don't backpedal, you blamed the RJ pilots for undercutting each other, as if that somehow has any effect on the flying not coming back to mainline. stop kidding yourself
Zero back pedal. I do blame RJ pilots for screwing each other for the third time. You are clueless if you think continually giving RJ and mainline Mgmts a continued refresh of a low bidder carrier has no effect on your plight.
ChrisJT6 is offline  
Old 10-31-2018, 11:18 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
elmetal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Default

Originally Posted by ChrisJT6 View Post
Zero back pedal. I do blame RJ pilots for screwing each other for the third time. You are clueless if you think continually giving RJ and mainline Mgmts a continued refresh of a low bidder carrier has no effect on your plight.
So you think when one regional says no to a ****ty contract that the flying doesn't then get sent to another ****ty regional?

Have you been following the American wholly owned charade? Or maybe you are more following the UAX charade, guess what, the flying got all taken from XJT (good contract) and given to TSA/Mesa/Republic/Skywest.

That's how it works in the regional industry, you take the garbage or you lose the flying, PERIOD. The only way to get the flying back from regionals is through your CBA, not hoping and praying that everyone will say no in the regionals. Because if they do, guess what happens? Remember when TSA said no to a garbage contract in exchange for crj700s? Yeah they literally created a new airline, GoJet.


NOTHING will change unless it is from the top. Stop blaming the pilots that are in the mess YOU (categorical legacy you, not you personally) created.
elmetal is offline  
Old 10-31-2018, 11:32 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,671
Default

This thread is covering a lot of good ground;

From ignorant new hire that needs to be schooled on scope, to mil vs civ, to the chicken-egg/blame the regionals-blame the legacies for scope give.

Well done everyone, scotch all around.
John Carr is offline  
Old 10-31-2018, 11:58 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 711
Default

Originally Posted by Galaxy5 View Post
God I cringe when I walk into the crew room, meet my CA for the next 4 days and see that ring. I like finding out on day 2 that a guy is a grad, because that means he’s probably letting his work speak for him and not some rolled mold of gems and gold.

Favorite line so far when it comes out that I’m also one of them “well my son, wife, uncle, brother in law, father and dog are grads and we all wear our rings and give to the endowment! You need to take pride in the institution that’s given you so much!”

It’s like they’re out to make the entire group look bad.
Generally I like flying with mil guys. They are straight forward and usually not off the spectrum. However I tend to agree with the ring statement, has nothing to do with the ring itself, that's fine. But generally the types of guys that wear the ring are just a little off.
Broncofan is offline  
Old 10-31-2018, 12:21 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

I flew with a guy with the top two buttons unbuttoned, gold medallion nestled in his chest hair and when the “stu” brought the coffee up it was, “darlin’ why don’t you do me a favor and stick your finger in my coffee to sweeten it a bit.”

There are all kinds.
APC225 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
CAL EWR
United
44
11-26-2012 01:29 PM
CAL EWR
United
67
11-25-2012 03:46 PM
TANSTAAFL
Major
79
03-09-2011 04:50 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
4
05-04-2006 06:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices