Vacancy 20-03V
#12
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 670
Likes: 1
The company has already said why they prefer to break up the bids, so when you look at this one combined with last months in that context, pretty damn nice movement. Now that we have 2 month widebody FOs, guess all that’s left is 2 yr NB Capts. Probably won’t go that junior right now, but if not for the max debacle and all the capt seats those jets would generate, we’d be there imo.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
The company has already said why they prefer to break up the bids, so when you look at this one combined with last months in that context, pretty damn nice movement. Now that we have 2 month widebody FOs, guess all that’s left is 2 yr NB Capts. Probably won’t go that junior right now, but if not for the max debacle and all the capt seats those jets would generate, we’d be there imo.
#14
Totally agree

Really though, how stupid can a Union be.? I'll go on record here to say that SWAPA will not prevail in their lawsuit against Boeing. Sheeesh, what maroooooons.
#15
#16
#17
New Hire
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
I was wondering how many vacancies are going to be in CLE.
#18
You look like a nail
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
FACTS: All pilots at SWA fly the B737 aircraft. Boeing delivered a product with undisclosed defects. SWA pilots suffered financial damage due to Boeing’s negligence. SWAPA is seeking $10K per pilot in restitution.
Weather or not they prevail is less important than recognizing a union that’s looking to make its members financially whole.
Nice unity Joe.
#19
. The only real winners on these things are the law firms 
Note: Since SW flies 737s exclusively their pilot group has a stronger case for damages than we do. But I'm not holding my breath in any case... Hopefully I can make any money back when 30+ Maxes come back on the line in very short order.
#20
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 406
Likes: 5
From: A320 FO
Thor
What company made it a requirement for no additional training to be required with the MaX order? Your lawsuit is a product of your own companies stupidity. Btw ual is just as just as guilty. Every US airline was giddy (Except DAL but I’m sure they were all too happy use the max for a better 320 price) at lower cost on a current type. Boeing caved.
Fun little side not SWA had an employees with in ranks that fully understood the short comings of the max.
What company made it a requirement for no additional training to be required with the MaX order? Your lawsuit is a product of your own companies stupidity. Btw ual is just as just as guilty. Every US airline was giddy (Except DAL but I’m sure they were all too happy use the max for a better 320 price) at lower cost on a current type. Boeing caved.
Fun little side not SWA had an employees with in ranks that fully understood the short comings of the max.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



