Contract talks
#31
Joe, I'm curious what I posted (in this thread) that warrants me a tinfoil hat? Baseball tossed up a joke about Ray-Bans for Christmas and I opined that we won't see a TA by then.
Yet a year ago you (with the input of your executive collective brain trust) told us that we were about to ink a new contract and UA was about to order a whole slew of new small narrow-body airplanes.
Who needs to take off the tinfoil hat?
Yet a year ago you (with the input of your executive collective brain trust) told us that we were about to ink a new contract and UA was about to order a whole slew of new small narrow-body airplanes.
Who needs to take off the tinfoil hat?
You are 100% correct, and I was 100% wrong on that issue, but that was an interpretation of human motives and subject to misinterpretation of which I plead guilty.
However, you have espoused an opinion on multiple threads that it is possible to game numbers to change profit sharing, but it is my point that altering publicly traded companies financial details is all but impossible unless you are a criminal. That does not mean owners do not have the ability to bleed a company dry when they want, but such actions are visible to the public and legal in the end.
Ask me about LBOs in America, and how they are a corrupt legalized theft. That is what Lorenzo did to EAL and what Lorenzo's employer, namely Texas Pacific Group or TPG did to my wife's company formally called, IMS Health.
#32
Well let’s all just remember, the company has money for:
Billions in buybacks
New RJ’s for express
New livery
New uniforms for all work groups
Hundreds of millions to loan to Avianca
New ground equipment
..... and no new contract unless we give concessions.
I love the nice guy act, but the buck stops somewhere.
Billions in buybacks
New RJ’s for express
New livery
New uniforms for all work groups
Hundreds of millions to loan to Avianca
New ground equipment
..... and no new contract unless we give concessions.
I love the nice guy act, but the buck stops somewhere.
#33
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 718
Likes: 17
Well let’s all just remember, the company has money for:
Billions in buybacks
New RJ’s for express
New livery
New uniforms for all work groups
Hundreds of millions to loan to Avianca
New ground equipment
..... and no new contract unless we give concessions.
I love the nice guy act, but the buck stops somewhere.
Billions in buybacks
New RJ’s for express
New livery
New uniforms for all work groups
Hundreds of millions to loan to Avianca
New ground equipment
..... and no new contract unless we give concessions.
I love the nice guy act, but the buck stops somewhere.
#34
I’m not surprised though, you came to the company’s defense judging by your history. Soon enough you’ll have your blue meatball. 😂
#35
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 718
Likes: 17
Funny how now airplanes are now “due” for paint. Yet over the years how many planes have you seen in desperate need of one and yet be neglected?
I’m not surprised though, you came to the company’s defense judging by your history. Soon enough you’ll have your blue meatball. 😂
I’m not surprised though, you came to the company’s defense judging by your history. Soon enough you’ll have your blue meatball. 😂
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
I think we are all happy the company can afford it. We have all worked at places that could not and working for a successful company is better. But, what is the best is when the company enjoys the success they are having and does not ruin it by going to war with its employees. How about they continue the success and quit trying to eliminate jobs through scope relief. Let the employees who have done an outstanding job keeping this place going through a lot of change and turmoil a contract that we deserve!!!
#37
United, and airlines in general, have a poor history of keeping up the livery’s. At least this cycle we’re lucky it happens to coincide with derivative rebranding of what we have.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 18
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 1
if the company is painting planes 5 to 7 years ahead of schedule it's for one reason only............to spend the money.
New ground equipment, new tugs. look for those next.
New uniforms, for everyone, and I mean everyone, that's third. Maybe it was first, but the barney purple didn't go over well. Oscar's son went back to the drawing board to re-design it.
Creative executive compensation coming after that maybe.....
Oscar and Kirby........just two good ole boys, never meaning any harm, sorta like the dukes of hazard in the big city.
New ground equipment, new tugs. look for those next.
New uniforms, for everyone, and I mean everyone, that's third. Maybe it was first, but the barney purple didn't go over well. Oscar's son went back to the drawing board to re-design it.
Creative executive compensation coming after that maybe.....
Oscar and Kirby........just two good ole boys, never meaning any harm, sorta like the dukes of hazard in the big city.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 1
New livery isn't needed. It's just a waste of money. They want us to single engine taxi and not run the APU? I guess that's to pay for their new livery?? Nothing beats subsidizing stupidity.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



