Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
787 getting Premium Pay Trips >

787 getting Premium Pay Trips

Search

Notices

787 getting Premium Pay Trips

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2020 | 09:03 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Thor
No, I think he’s saying that you shouldn’t get paid any extra, just the 70 hours. So in addition to having pilots on furlough, which sucks, in this model the remaining pilots get to fix the company’s scheduling problems for free. Makes sense right?
No, you're not fixing the company's scheduling problems. Again, no one's forced to fly above caps. But you knew that - just conveniently ignoring it again. And again.
Reply
Old 06-25-2020 | 09:07 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by CANEWT
If we, as a collective group, stop picking up PP, or open time in general the company will staff those flights by getting an injunction against us for an illegal job action. And then sue the union to recoup the lost revenue.
You guys are forgetting who your dealing with, and how much of a disadvantage we are at.
That's a contract negotiation tactic because status quo applies. Status quo during furloughs? I seriously doubt that's in the RLA.
Reply
Old 06-25-2020 | 10:25 AM
  #73  
SONORA PASS's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Left - Dodge Caravan
Default

Originally Posted by Sixty N Two
Hmmmm, where is the historical precedent for injunctions and illegal actions to support your statement? Has that ever happened with pilots out on furlough? Seriously asking???
Yes, unfortunately it did happen.
The last time we furloughed at UAL, the company did take us to court over accepting SRM/JRM...and they won.

.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:08-cv-04317

Plaintiff, United Air Lines, Inc. (“United”), filed a complaint on July 30, 2008 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under Section 2, First of the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”), 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., against the Air Line Pilots Association, International (“ALPA”) and four United pilots...

SP
Reply
Old 06-25-2020 | 11:07 AM
  #74  
Nucflash's Avatar
Orbis Non Sufficit
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 788
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by SONORA PASS
Yes, unfortunately it did happen.
The last time we furloughed at UAL, the company did take us to court over accepting SRM/JRM...and they won.

.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:08-cv-04317

Plaintiff, United Air Lines, Inc. (“United”), filed a complaint on July 30, 2008 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under Section 2, First of the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”), 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., against the Air Line Pilots Association, International (“ALPA”) and four United pilots...

SP
Kirby might not want to go nuclear, whereas Tilton didn’t care.
Reply
Old 06-25-2020 | 11:22 AM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: 737/FO
Default

Originally Posted by SONORA PASS
Yes, unfortunately it did happen.
The last time we furloughed at UAL, the company did take us to court over accepting SRM/JRM...and they won.

.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:08-cv-04317

Plaintiff, United Air Lines, Inc. (“United”), filed a complaint on July 30, 2008 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under Section 2, First of the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”), 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., against the Air Line Pilots Association, International (“ALPA”) and four United pilots...

SP
Thanks for the post, I’ll take a look
Reply
Old 06-25-2020 | 12:44 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

I think it would be a hard sell for a judge to force pilots to work during a health pandemic regardless of what the past precedent indicates.
Reply
Old 06-25-2020 | 01:08 PM
  #77  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Good to know we can count on you to feather your bed and be a diligent worker for all the silver you can grab, you know, to keep the company moving forward. Picking up PP for yourself will teach mgmt! They’ll definitely bring back our furloughed brothers and sisters with trustworthy minions willing to prostitute themselves out and pick up the slack! Cancelled flights and empty cockpits have never led to recalls because selfish individuals like you can be counted on. Solidarity is obviously not in your vocabulary Richard.



That’s some straight up SCAB reasoning right there.

PPU is a tool to make up for manning shortfalls during times of plenty, when hiring and the pilot supply can’t keep up with demand. It’s a win win when times are good. It was never intended as a tool for mgmt to take advantage of the selfish nature of the Richards like you to keep furloughs on the street.

^^^^^THIS^^^^^

To this day I can still tell you the names of every "Richard" that exhibited this behavior in my fleet at the time. Despite his reasoning he is wrong. The SSC keeps track every month of how trips are or are not covered. For every "02" out there feathering his bed, it is a data point for the company to show that more pilots are not needed in that category. This is a fact.
Funny how all the "Richards" got upset when their calendars were printed and hung on the wall in operations for all to see. Even funnier to see them become enraged to see their calendar show up on the wall again AFTER they had blocked it from public viewing. Pilots of this ilk are only marginally better than scabs and as such have found a place in the back of my yellow book on a special page all its own.

Pest
Reply
Old 06-25-2020 | 01:25 PM
  #78  
You look like a nail
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
No, you're not fixing the company's scheduling problems. Again, no one's forced to fly above caps. But you knew that - just conveniently ignoring it again. And again.
OK, solve this:

Let’s say pilots are on furlough and I start a trip at whatever the cap is minus one minute. Now during this trip any of the following happen:

I divert for a fuel (UPA 2 hours pay)
I do an engine run (UPA pilots get paid)
I’m reassigned an return to base a day late (UPA M5D)
...or any of the other things that trigger an increase to pay credit.

Since I started the trip at cap minus one minute, your advocacy is that I shouldn’t be paid for any of those things? Mind you that each of those items were negotiated, i.e. we gave something to the company in exchange. Now you’d like me to work for free? That sounds an awful lot like concessions.
Reply
Old 06-25-2020 | 03:22 PM
  #79  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sixty N Two
Thanks for the post, I’ll take a look
Find almost any informed LUAL pilot of that era and they can fill you in on it.

Note that it also resulted in multiple disciplinary cases and a termination among the four named pilots that were co-defendants in the suit.

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/b.../31united.html

The fired pilot was eventually re-instated with full back pay after an excessive amount of time on the street as the company soft-pedaled the arbitration process to hold him as a hostage.
Reply
Old 06-25-2020 | 04:14 PM
  #80  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sixty N Two
Hmmmm, where is the historical precedent for injunctions and illegal actions to support your statement? Has that ever happened with pilots out on furlough? Seriously asking???

If we did something like this to force a new UPA or something of that nature I’d be inclined to agree with your assumptions. When the company can’t meet demand while pilots on property are flying the contract and management has a plentiful bench of furloughed pilots to recall, I find it hard to see a court say our union owes the company money because the members didn’t chose to line their pockets with PP trips and when all management had to do was recall furloughed pilots to meet demand.

Again, I’ll admit lack of airline business lawyer level knowledge, but the context and assumptions you make about past PP pickups may be associated with other reasons and environments that pilots may choose not to pick up PP trips. Nobody suggests pilots should not trip trade or aggressive pick up for reserves, QoL choices, etc. This is about greedy people being greedy. Paint it however else you want. If someone is going to go to the hog trough so be it. It’s a Richard move and I doubt those who will do it can be persuaded not to do so or that they will lose a minute of sleep.
It appears you have not been in the industry back in the bad days, we at UAL were taken to the woodshed pretty bad, pilots lost jobs, the union got an injunction against us and we had to put out communications imploring pilots to pick up trips. The key was you could not change behavior if you never picked up trips then it was fine not to but if you were a pilot who often picked up you needed to continue picking up, it was very bad, The judge compared us to criminals that she heard every story from the past including how we treated scabs, she hated us.

Also, I am guessing you do not know about the time the AA pilots union was sued by their company and lost, the fine was was every penny they had plus 1, the judge was going to break them monetarily. The union and the company agreed to a new contract so that the union did not have to pay the fine. As you can imagine they paid the fine it was just thru lost contractual improvements, maybe not every penny but the union/pilots paid a significant cost.

Do some reading on airline union history is my advice, we and you might need the lessons from the past.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM
gzsg
Major
132
12-07-2013 08:27 PM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
CAL EWR
United
44
11-26-2012 01:29 PM
stinsonjr
Cargo
24
04-12-2008 08:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices