![]() |
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 3076889)
You are saying they lost 15% seniority from where they were on the MAD? Sorry not buying it.
|
Originally Posted by O2pilot
(Post 3077369)
No pilot gained/lost more than 5%. This magical % they lost comes from the way they built their proposal, where the bottom CAL pilot was at 100% seniority, but the bottom United pilot was at 127% seniority, because they put the bottom active United pilot at 100% (Bot not the bottom active CAL pilot). This is how all those “I lost 15%” stories came up.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3078074)
Wrong as usual. 60% in company to 75% in company everbody included. 75-60 = 15%.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk According to the seniority list from 2010 provided by the CAL MEC for the integration, the pilot at exactly 60% was an August 5th 1998 hire. That pilot ended up at 60.2% on the final seniority list. A drop of only .2%. The 75% pilot at CAL pre-merger was an August 9th 2005 hire. That pilot ended up at 73.1% on the SLI. He improved himself 1.9% relative seniority. Not sure how you went from 60% to 75%. |
Originally Posted by O2pilot
(Post 3078087)
I can solve this quickly.
According to the seniority list from 2010 provided by the CAL MEC for the integration, the pilot at exactly 60% was an August 5th 1998 hire. That pilot ended up at 60.2% on the final seniority list. A drop of only .2%. The 75% pilot at CAL pre-merger was an August 9th 2005 hire. That pilot ended up at 73.1% on the SLI. He improved himself 1.9% relative seniority. Not sure how you went from 60% to 75%. They use their percentage from the ISL date not the merger announcement date to come up with the 15% number. It sounds far more dramatic that way. |
Originally Posted by O2pilot
(Post 3078087)
I can solve this quickly.
According to the seniority list from 2010 provided by the CAL MEC for the integration, the pilot at exactly 60% was an August 5th 1998 hire. That pilot ended up at 60.2% on the final seniority list. A drop of only .2%. The 75% pilot at CAL pre-merger was an August 9th 2005 hire. That pilot ended up at 73.1% on the SLI. He improved himself 1.9% relative seniority. Not sure how you went from 60% to 75%. Moonshot vs. Reality |
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 3078155)
They use their percentage from the ISL date not the merger announcement date to come up with the 15% number. It sounds far more dramatic that way.
|
Originally Posted by catIIIc
(Post 3078226)
Exactly, what some of my more dense brethren don’t understand, snapshots always taken at date of merger not some other arbitrary date. Once merger happens decisions are based on merged company not two separate companies .
|
I'll take this opportunity during my morning dump to say: this forum, and this industry= full blown AIDS.
Time for some paperwork. |
Originally Posted by SlickMachine
(Post 3078559)
I'll take this opportunity during my morning dump to say: this forum, and this industry= full blown AIDS.
Time for some paperwork. |
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 3078155)
They use their percentage from the ISL date not the merger announcement date to come up with the 15% number. It sounds far more dramatic that way.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:18 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands