3900 (if not more)

Reply Subscribe

Page 2 of 15

Last »

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

07-30-2020 | 07:00 AM

#11

ScarebusPusher

Line Holder

Joined: Jan 2019

Posts: 28

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ni hao

5000+ get 2005 hires 1999 LUA

Ok, how about 3900? Hiring was extremely quiet for a lot of years between 2005 and a few years ago when it picked up massively.

07-30-2020 | 07:03 AM

#12

Al Czervik

You scratched my anchor

Joined: Feb 2011

Posts: 5,123

Likes: 74

Quote:

Originally Posted by GolferNJ

Except, where he went around the union to float concessions as another option.

Yes, by scaring the junior guys with job losses and senior guys with career expectations.

07-30-2020 | 07:04 AM

#13

Triumph

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 348

Likes: 0

From: .

Quote:

Originally Posted by ScarebusPusher

Ok, how about 3900? Hiring was extremely quiet for a lot of years between 2005 and a few years ago when it picked up massively.

It takes out just about every post merger hire.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

07-30-2020 | 07:04 AM

#14

Short Bus Drive

Thread Starter

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 1,887

Likes: 0

From: Guppy Capt.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ScarebusPusher

Ok, how about 3900? Hiring was extremely quiet for a lot of years between 2005 and a few years ago when it picked up massively.

From TOTAL pilots on the seniority list, that's right about me...
March '08 L-UAL
From ACTIVE pilots?

07-30-2020 | 07:10 AM

#15

cadetdrivr

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Oct 2010

Posts: 2,639

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive

From TOTAL pilots on the seniority list, that's right about me...
March '08 L-UAL
From ACTIVE pilots?

The chainsaw math according to our MEC Chair:

Compute a furlough number using your assumed % of ACTIVE pilots. (Example: 30% of 11,675 = 3,503)

Subtract that result from the TOTAL list. (Currently 13,047)

That's the very approximate line not accounting for interim retirements or voluntary reductions.

07-30-2020 | 07:15 AM

#16

ScarebusPusher

Line Holder

Joined: Jan 2019

Posts: 28

Likes: 0

Humor this none-US guy, if you will. Do the inactive numbers make the outlook better for the junior guys?

07-30-2020 | 07:28 AM

#17

mrmak2

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 424

Likes: 0

From: FO

Quote:

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr

this is correct according to the MEC message, however Brian’s CCS memo today very specifically mentions 3900 and then the ACTIVE pilot number (11,675). Perhaps there was an earlier understanding using the percentage/total calculation but my read is that now we are talking about 11,675-3900=7,775 by early next year. I do believe there is gamesmanship involved regarding the cares 2 money

07-30-2020 | 07:28 AM

#18

JetPilotMike

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jan 2008

Posts: 229

Likes: 0

From: CRJ, CR7, A320, B737

I thought I heard PC say on a call that 10,797 was the 8-Ball of the 2,250. So, another 1,650 lands at 9,147. That's just my guess. That would include a few pre-merger pilots.

07-30-2020 | 07:29 AM

#19

MasterOfPuppets

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Feb 2012

Posts: 3,599

Likes: 205

From: 787

Quote:

Originally Posted by ScarebusPusher

Ok, how about 3900? Hiring was extremely quiet for a lot of years between 2005 and a few years ago when it picked up massively.

3900 is a magic number. It is all of the post merger hires down to the number. What They have done is pitted our new generation of pilots against the old generation.

Negotiating in public and begging for concessions by putting the pilot group against one another.