Search

Notices

3900 (if not more)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2020 | 10:05 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by 303flyboy
Nevermind. It’s all fubar let’s hope the economy gets better soon for everyone so that people start flying more
This. And we need Europe to open and governors to lift quarantines. I think people want to travel, but they don’t want to travel to quarantine. A vaccine will help this, even if just psychologically.
Reply
Old 07-31-2020 | 10:54 PM
  #112  
Bestglide's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 535
Likes: 22
From: 756 left...
Default

Originally Posted by Deathray
This. And we need Europe to open and governors to lift quarantines. I think people want to travel, but they don’t want to travel to quarantine. A vaccine will help this, even if just psychologically.
I think this will happen sooner than later and we will start to see bookings go up again. In the meantime we need these governors to stop with the quarantine nonsense. There’s already information out there indicating the virus is starting to either drop or level off amongst the southern states.
A theory I have read stated that the initial outbreak states were infected first like the northeast , California, and Washington because of direct flights from China and or Europe to a certain degree. These states eventually developed herd immunity, that’s why we aren’t seeing it spike despite riots and such there. Now the southern states which weren’t initially affected are going through the same process. So herd immunity will come soon there as well. Hopefully!
then our cases will be down enough and you will see international travel pick up as well.
maybe I’m being too optimistic? Time will tell, but in the mean time I’m not hanging all my hopes on a vaccine that may or may not happen in the same timeframe.
Reply
Old 08-01-2020 | 03:04 AM
  #113  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 872
Likes: 34
Default

Originally Posted by DashTrash
You are comparing apples to oranges!!! ANY ULCC cannot compare to any of the Legacies. Our business model is completely different than theirs. They do no real international flying. The Legacies do. They have a different customer base than the Legacies do. Our product is completely different than theirs, and that includes SWA. I’m not saying we’re better, I’m just saying that we’re much different.
Also my point. If we shrink to 50% we aren't going to be a legacie business model anymore. People are saying that we are going to shrink by 3900 pilots and then discounting how much that will change our product. Multiple people are bloviating about "this will be my third furlough" without understanding how a furlough that deep will basically bankrupt and reshape United. I honestly dont think they will furlough that deep because of how challenging changing their entire business model will be.
Reply
Old 08-01-2020 | 06:22 AM
  #114  
SONORA PASS's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Left - Dodge Caravan
Default

Originally Posted by Aquaticus
Also my point. If we shrink to 50% we aren't going to be a legacie business model anymore. People are saying that we are going to shrink by 3900 pilots and then discounting how much that will change our product. Multiple people are bloviating about "this will be my third furlough" without understanding how a furlough that deep will basically bankrupt and reshape United. I honestly dont think they will furlough that deep because of how challenging changing their entire business model will be.
Aquaticus,

I hope the number is far less than 3,900, but United has operated below that size not too long ago. United can and has operated profitably at a much smaller size.

Please look at the 3 quotes directly from the ISL award statements and consider the results of United's last downsizing efforts.


CONTINENTAL AND UNITED AIR LINES PRE-MERGER SITUATION
United made a conscious business decision to shrink in order to make money, shrinking its fleet size dramatically from 2000 to October 1, 2010. United had approximately 610 aircraft in operation in 2000 and only 359 in 2010, a reduction of over 40%.

On October 1, 2010, United had 7,699 pilots, of which 6,254 (81%) were active and 1,445 (19%) were furloughed. Of the active pilots, 2,575 were captains and 3,679 were first officers.

[During this time] UAL recovered swiftly, however, and earned about a billion and a half dollars from 1Q2009 to 3Q2010.


I hope we are not on the same path once again, but the company has done this before.

SP
Reply
Old 08-01-2020 | 06:53 AM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SONORA PASS
Aquaticus,

I hope the number is far less than 3,900, but United has operated below that size not too long ago. United can and has operated profitably at a much smaller size.

Please look at the 3 quotes directly from the ISL award statements and consider the results of United's last downsizing efforts.


CONTINENTAL AND UNITED AIR LINES PRE-MERGER SITUATION
United made a conscious business decision to shrink in order to make money, shrinking its fleet size dramatically from 2000 to October 1, 2010. United had approximately 610 aircraft in operation in 2000 and only 359 in 2010, a reduction of over 40%.

On October 1, 2010, United had 7,699 pilots, of which 6,254 (81%) were active and 1,445 (19%) were furloughed. Of the active pilots, 2,575 were captains and 3,679 were first officers.

[During this time] UAL recovered swiftly, however, and earned about a billion and a half dollars from 1Q2009 to 3Q2010.


I hope we are not on the same path once again, but the company has done this before.

SP

What were UALs debt numbers back then? Anyone can shrink as long as debt obligations aren’t too high, but when you are owned by what you owe, you lack control.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 08-01-2020 | 06:58 AM
  #116  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by C5Drvr
What were UALs debt numbers back then? Anyone can shrink as long as debt obligations aren’t too high, but when you are owned by what you owe, you lack control.
FWIW, at the time of the merger both UAL and CAL had virtually no unencumbered assets. (i.e. lots of debt) We've seen, and survived, this show before.

But yes, the creditors call the shots. In fact, there was so much overlap of creditors and investors that it was one of many reasons for the UAL/CAL merger in the first place instead of a different combination.
Reply
Old 08-01-2020 | 07:52 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: DC9 CA
Default WARN Notice

I believe the WARN notice will be the worst case scenario. That has to be done right now, if I'm not mistaken. The furloughs are not a given until someone gets notified.

In any event, my cynical side says all this "cost cutting" will lead to handsome management bonus payouts. The excuse will be, "We're contractually obligated to pay the bonus! What are we supposed to do?"
Reply
Old 08-01-2020 | 08:06 AM
  #118  
oldmako's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 3
From: The GF of FUPM
Default

We could start by digging our heels in. Deep.
Reply
Old 08-01-2020 | 08:16 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
I think most of us learned from whiteturd's missteps post-911 when he desperately tried to save the pension, all for naught. He gave away unlimited 70 seaters (you know, the ones 'we'll never see on the ramp') and pushed through massive pay cuts and work rule changes and the pension still got turned over to the PBGC. So screw concessions and if another MC tried to pull a whiteturd, a lot of us would be pushing for a recall.
I'm quoting myself to emphasize this point.
If the company wants any concessions from the pilots, they'll need to discuss it with the man in the black dress.
Reply
Old 08-01-2020 | 08:25 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
if bankruptcy was so amazing we would already be there....every airline would be. The reason we are not ( I suspect) is because Kirby and the rest of the CEOs don’t think CH 11 is an option when we are this ****ed. You still need people to invest in you to emerge from CH 11. And then you come out with clapped out airplanes a shoddy product and no route structure.
Pardon? You really need to read up on the BK process because you don't understand it very well.

You think that going through the Chap 11 process is amazing? For whom? It sucks for everyone including management. And especially creditors and line employees.

And if there isn't a legitimate case for Chap 11, the man in the black dress will throw it out and not allow the company to file.

Chap 11 is a long sucko process and let's hope that no airline has to go through it. However, before United gets to that point, there will be others who will have already filed, including from my estimation at least one ULCC and one LCC. So if anyone thinks that ULCCs/LCCs are doing OK, they really need to pull up each airline's Q2 (lack of) earnings. They're all as bad as United. Some quite a bit worse.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices