Agreement in Principle
09-09-2020 | 03:56 AM
#12
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 671
Likes: 11
From: B767 Captain
Seems like a big difference to me. I read it as stopping all future displacement bids, where the quote you used indicates to me it would include already announced but untrained displacements as well.
I guess we find out in a week or so.
09-09-2020 | 04:38 AM
#13
Banned
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: FO
So let's just furlough 2850 right? This isn't the 80s or 90s. Get over it. Your talking like a scab. Industry has changed. It will pass.
09-09-2020 | 04:42 AM
#14
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
exactly. The inability to think critically about something is amazing. I’m impressed our union came up with something and look forward to reading it myself.
09-09-2020 | 04:52 AM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
I don’t see the word “planned” in his email - Did i overlook it, or did you modify his quote?
Seems like a big difference to me. I read it as stopping all future displacement bids, where the quote you used indicates to me it would include already announced but untrained displacements as well.
I guess we find out in a week or so.
Seems like a big difference to me. I read it as stopping all future displacement bids, where the quote you used indicates to me it would include already announced but untrained displacements as well.
I guess we find out in a week or so.
When you combine that with what the MC said in his email you can see some real benefit for every seniority bucket. “Any potential mitigation must achieve our goals: stop planned furloughs, stop displacements,....”
Top 1/3: Seniority will allow them to pickup most premium pay since nobody is furloughed. No displacement to lower paying aircraft.
Middle 1/3: Some premium pay. No displacement to lower paying seat or aircraft.
Bottom 1/3: Keep Job
Maybe I’m naive and perhaps I’ve oversimplified. I do however look forward to seeing what we have to vote on.
09-09-2020 | 04:56 AM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 18
It’s not difficult to see that the last couple displacements were setting us up for Oct 1 where we could furlough.
When you combine that with what the MC said in his email you can see some real benefit for every seniority bucket. “Any potential mitigation must achieve our goals: stop planned furloughs, stop displacements,....”
Top 1/3: Seniority will allow them to pickup most premium pay since nobody is furloughed. No displacement to lower paying aircraft.
Middle 1/3: Some premium pay. No displacement to lower paying seat or aircraft.
Bottom 1/3: Keep Job
Maybe I’m naive and perhaps I’ve oversimplified. I do however look forward to seeing what we have to vote on.
When you combine that with what the MC said in his email you can see some real benefit for every seniority bucket. “Any potential mitigation must achieve our goals: stop planned furloughs, stop displacements,....”
Top 1/3: Seniority will allow them to pickup most premium pay since nobody is furloughed. No displacement to lower paying aircraft.
Middle 1/3: Some premium pay. No displacement to lower paying seat or aircraft.
Bottom 1/3: Keep Job
Maybe I’m naive and perhaps I’ve oversimplified. I do however look forward to seeing what we have to vote on.
09-09-2020 | 05:15 AM
#18
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 54
Those who truly understand what’s happening ,and know the history to provide context, were banned. Sad that it turned into a place of such little industrial knowledge, when for years it was the gold standard of pilot forums. I hope the mods reconsider their poor decision.
09-09-2020 | 05:19 AM
#19
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Those who truly understand what’s happening ,and know the history to provide context, were banned. Sad that it turned into a place of such little industrial knowledge, when for years it was the gold standard of pilot forums. I hope the mods reconsider their poor decision.
09-09-2020 | 05:19 AM
#20
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
I'm assuming this is a technical question instead of an existential one?
If so, as you know the the main web address results in a non-sensical error. Obviously they are having some serious problems.
However, it looks like the link to unread posts works as a backdoor of sorts. (This requires that you have already signed on and there's cookies on your device.)
If so, as you know the the main web address results in a non-sensical error. Obviously they are having some serious problems.
However, it looks like the link to unread posts works as a backdoor of sorts. (This requires that you have already signed on and there's cookies on your device.)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
