Search

Notices

Agreement in Principle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2020 | 01:15 PM
  #271  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
Crickets from all the guys that will be cashing in someone else’s chips.
You got that right brother. Even on the other forum, no one can justify the carve out (if true) as well. Heck, no one can reasonably explain why it’s even there.
Reply
Old 09-10-2020 | 01:17 PM
  #272  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by 130shadow
You got that right brother. Even on the other forum, no one can justify the carve out (if true) as well.
Heck, no one can reasonably explain why it’s even there.
They don’t even want to talk about it, imagine that.
Reply
Old 09-10-2020 | 01:24 PM
  #273  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: 757 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by duvie
I don’t think most junior people feel they are owed anything. I honestly think that’s your preconceived notion about what someone’s beliefs are … But I think the idea that junior pilots are furlough fodder for bad Times is not an idea I would like to take as a core UAL ALPA belief going forward. I would rather have provisions à la FedEx that allow for some reduction in MPG for unforecast events. And plan my finances accordingly for the events we will inevitable hit every 10 years or so. I’m okay if my earning potential is less because of this. I would rather fly with junior FOs knowing we as UAL pilots do our best to take care of those junior pilots who take a huge chance coming here in their 40s.

we have legal teams our dues pay a lot of money for to look at how the language could be crafted, and even then I would have to read it for myself. But as stated many times, as a junior captain not holding a furlough letter, I for one would consider a (Hypothetical) TA that effectively delivers me a 66% paycut (NB CA to 50% NB FO) If it kept people off the street
Pop on over to the FedEx forum. 4a2b (furlough mitigation) is still being argued about today, 12 years later. Plenty of negotiating capital was used to try to fix the stuff that wasn’t interpreted in the way the MEC thought it would be when it was applied by the company (negotiations that should have been about pay and benefits). I don’t recommend that UA pilots go actively in search of a new slippery slope, there are already plenty of them out there.

Pipe
Reply
Old 09-10-2020 | 01:25 PM
  #274  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
Crickets from all the guys that will be cashing in someone else’s chips.
That’s because this thread is dominated by like 5 or 6 people. You honestly think 12,000+ pilots are on here and just not posting? Plenty of people don’t feel the need to validate themselves by anonymously posting their views in the hopes that they might influence somebody’s vote. I wish I was one of them.
Reply
Old 09-10-2020 | 01:40 PM
  #275  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by duvie
flaming POS… Huh. The thing that no one has read yet? The agreement that our hard-working volunteer union members have probably been losing sleep to get to us for our review?

I guess you don’t trust yourself to use your critical thinking hat and just vote no before you read it? Are you afraid of what happens when you start thinking for yourself, you might be tempted to see a nuanced position somewhere between the two ends of the spectrum? we have a lot of amazing guys and gals volunteering their time to try and make our careers better. I trust that the negotiating committee and MEC will not send us something terrible, and if We happen to not believe it is in our best interest, We will vote no.

try to treat situations like they are dynamic… It helps in the cockpit and in life too
I think I’m going to start volunteering for that hard working 90+ hr a month zoom job.
Reply
Old 09-10-2020 | 01:41 PM
  #276  
crflyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

A lot of you keep acting like the company should just pay everyone a normal amount to do nothing. Darn company! They “chose to furlough!”. They should have “offered a real early out”. Never mind they don’t need over half of us and will lose even more money once Cares runs out. But yeah, they should pay everyone to retire or sit at home.
Reply
Old 09-10-2020 | 01:46 PM
  #277  
oldmako's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 3
From: The GF of FUPM
Default

Originally Posted by HuggyU2
Since this is all speculation and none of us know what is in the AIP, it disappoints me that you would already set your vote in stone.
It won't surprise me in the least if the actual language is essentially what's been leaked. Why? Because it's always been this way. The union always starts selling in advance. You get a whiff of this fart, a whiff of that one. They stink. The putrid vapors become more and more pronounced. Kinder screams otherwise and counsels calm like Kevin Bacon in Animal House.




Then the turd flops out and hits the deck. I don't think its speculation.

Like it or not, we're a bunch of blue collar union workers and we have a contract. The mere idea that we are entertaining ANYTHING at this point in time makes me retch. They have billions now and access to billions more. Hell, there may even be a vaccine in the next 6 to 9 months. Our contract expired years ago! Yet they mictureated away 9B of our rainy day fund while laughing and giving us the finger from their corner booth at Mortons! SUCKERS!

This proposal turns sentiority upside down and divides the pilot group. This proposal turn us into migrant workers and ensures that WE will bail them out at each and every burp in the industry. This proposal opens the door for all of us to earn less money whenever they think it's necessary through reduced guarantee. I don't need to see the final language.
Reply
Old 09-10-2020 | 01:48 PM
  #278  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by crflyer
But yeah, they should pay everyone to retire or sit at home.
Not everyone....just me 🖕🏻😏🖕🏻

(Kidding.....in case that’s not crystal clear)
Reply
Old 09-10-2020 | 01:49 PM
  #279  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: 756 Left Side
Default

Originally Posted by duvie
flaming POS… Huh. The thing that no one has read yet? The agreement that our hard-working volunteer union members have probably been losing sleep to get to us for our review?

I guess you don’t trust yourself to use your critical thinking hat and just vote no before you read it? Are you afraid of what happens when you start thinking for yourself, you might be tempted to see a nuanced position somewhere between the two ends of the spectrum? we have a lot of amazing guys and gals volunteering their time to try and make our careers better. I trust that the negotiating committee and MEC will not send us something terrible, and if We happen to not believe it is in our best interest, We will vote no.

try to treat situations like they are dynamic… It helps in the cockpit and in life too
There is a reason why some of us do not blindly trust our union or negotiation committee-
5-J-1-h.
I would bet that the majority (90%+) of our pilots are not aware of this issue.

In that we were blatantly lied to. In the hearing regarding the violation of seat 4B, it turns out that the union sold that seat back to the company to get an extra $50 million towards our signing bonus, during negotiations and BEFORE the TA was put out there.
So instead of a $350 million signing bonus to all the pilots, the 756 pilots added another $50 million to the pot but were not told till afterwards.. that 5-J-1-h didn't 'actually' apply.

Who said it? "Trust but verify"...
(I know, it was RR)
Still holds true today.

And for those of you saying we don't even know if the rumors are true, will.. again, history-
Many of us have been around long enough to know that when certain things are 'leaked' right before the official union announcement, they are usually 95%ish on the mark.

History.. hmm, what a novel concept. Learning from it NOT trying to re-write it.

Motch
Reply
Old 09-10-2020 | 01:55 PM
  #280  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Default

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. STOP THE INSANITY AND VOTE NO IF THE AIP RUMORS ARE TRUE.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickair7777
SkyWest
453
04-20-2020 02:36 PM
shoelu
Major
5
09-03-2015 12:16 PM
ERJ135
American
26
02-26-2013 05:54 PM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices