Search

Notices

Agreement in Principle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2020 | 09:06 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 116
Default

Originally Posted by N6279P
If you’re not even going to bother reading it before deciding your vote, please do us a favor and don’t wear that ALPA pin anymore.
That sure seems to be your go to line. You asked me on another thread to stop wearing my ALPA pin for being against concessions that weaken the contract. I wasn’t aware that only those who agree with your vision were worthy of wearing the pin. Too bad, many of those people who disagree with you have been active members for decades, served on committees, and walked off of their jobs to man a picket line. Most of the people who are in the no concessions camp have learned from their scars, many have served throughout their careers, and have even laid their jobs on the line and walked off the job in mass rather than accept a subpar contract. I’d say that they are worthy of the pin.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 09:10 AM
  #62  
Giordano Bruno's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Thumbs down Don't do it

Any givebacks will only lower the bar in BK.

Mgmt will ignore their promise of "permanent improvements" the second it benefits them.

Don't be suckers.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 09:14 AM
  #63  
You look like a nail
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
Most of the people who are in the no concessions camp have learned from their scars, many have served throughout their careers, and have even laid their jobs on the line and walked off the job in mass rather than accept a subpar contract. I’d say that they are worthy of the pin.
No doubt, those who've been around this place for more than a few decades have seen this show before and have every right as ALPA stakeholders to be skeptical.

I'm a firm NO until the agreement convinces me otherwise. Like TI said early on, when we look across the landscape and see Stroopwafel and every other vendor, other employee groups, airport facilities, and management sharing the sacrifice, then maybe there's a conversation. Pilot concessions alone won't save the airline and I'm done putting my head on the chopping block.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 09:15 AM
  #64  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Barley
As an insider looking out and to all the automatic no voters these assumptions and speculative comments need to stop. We face the largest downturn in a century. If there’s a temporary path forward to protect all jobs AND keep a good place to work it should certainly be reviewed and discussed.
It seems that almost every turn of the decade, the Airline Industry is in crisis. The following timeline is partially excerpted from a recent update from Council 173.

1970’s- Oil Crisis
1980’s- Airline De-regulation
1990’s- Gulf War and Recession
2000’s- 9/11 Terror Attacks, SARS, Bankruptcies
2010’s- Great Recession
2020’s- Covid-19

Each decade and each crisis presented its own set of trials and tribulations.

This crisis will not be the last airline industry crisis. The pattern of crisis shows another one will follow in the 2030’s, 2040’s and 2050’s, and each crisis will be unprecedented if history continues to predict the future. Pilots will be told in the intervening years that the industry has changed and management is different, but it will be the same cyclical nature of the industry. It is crucial that we look at the career ahead to be certain that harm is not done in the long run while trying to protect the near term. Last week’s announcement from the company that they were accelerating the timeline of previously announced furloughs, and their corresponding errors made in sending two furlough notices with different dates to several pilots is unprecedented. Once this crisis has passed, you will each draw your own conclusions of whether this management is different as each prior pilot group has.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 09:15 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by Giordano Bruno
Any givebacks will only lower the bar in BK.

Mgmt will ignore their promise of "permanent improvements" the second it benefits them.

Don't be suckers.
Too late, just embrace the suck.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 09:19 AM
  #66  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Guppydriver95
are they as ironclad as our previous “ no furlough” clauses? Or our pension saving rj deal? Will they survive a trip through bankruptcy court? How bout we let Kirby use the cares loan money instead of having the pilots pay for it? Maybe cuz he doesn’t want those pesky exec compensation restrictions or stock buy back prohibitions? Just guessing.
That’s exactly it: the pilots will give concessions so the executives can pay off the restricted loans, resume stock buybacks and bonuses then pocket the rest. Happens every time.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 09:23 AM
  #67  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Barley
Respectfully, none of you have seen this before; however, you’ve certainly taken a beating before. Based on current and previous MEC communications I think the mistakes of the past were at the forefront of their negotiations leading to this AiP. Let’s all just wait to see IF it passes the MEC and then we can all read it for ourselves to make an informed decision.
IF? This is a done deal already. It’ll pass the MEC with 4-5 dissenting and then will be ratified with an 86% approval by the pilot group.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 09:25 AM
  #68  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 599
Likes: 46
Default

Chopping this thing up into 1/3rds based on seniority is wonderful to get this thing passed. The long term ramifications for UAL ALPA will be disastrous.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 09:29 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 116
Default

Originally Posted by Thor
No doubt, those who've been around this place for more than a few decades have seen this show before and have every right as ALPA stakeholders to be skeptical.

I'm a firm NO until the agreement convinces me otherwise. Like TI said early on, when we look across the landscape and see Stroopwafel and every other vendor, employee group, airport facilities, and management sharing the sacrifice, then maybe there's a conversation. Pilot concessions alone won't save the airline and I'm done putting my head on the chopping block.
I’m not a firm no for anything without reading it and asking questions. I’m a firm no for anything that after reading the proposal shows that we are weakening the contract. I don’t trust airline management, I don’t trust any snap back clause or similar language, and I believe that they have better attorneys and will always win.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 09:32 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Thor
It was no different Boyle's, the same 10 a-holes teeing up to see who could yell the loudest. Good riddance to that cesspool.

That said, if they have forum rules, they should stick to them regardless of the popularity of the opinion. If users won't obey the rules and there aren't enough moderators, one option is to shut it down, I suppose.
We all get they may not have read Dale Carnegie's book but their institutional knowledge was invaluable. The Brit may have worn out his caps lock but what he was saying two months ago is coming to fruition.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickair7777
SkyWest
453
04-20-2020 02:36 PM
shoelu
Major
5
09-03-2015 12:16 PM
ERJ135
American
26
02-26-2013 05:54 PM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices