Agreement in Principle
09-09-2020 | 04:42 PM
#161
777 - ret
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: Waco CG-4 center seat
09-09-2020 | 04:48 PM
#162
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: 777 FO
09-09-2020 | 05:27 PM
#163
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 741
Likes: 39
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
09-09-2020 | 05:36 PM
#164
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
That ^^^^ is just straight up ignorant. Having been at TK on three or four occasions (I’ve lost count with all the displacements in and out of the building) as an instructor during the lost decade I can assure you we didn’t have special pay rates. In fact along with the hourly rate reductions our pay cap was significantly reduced several times.
09-09-2020 | 05:56 PM
#167
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: 756
Some guys will never be happy in life.
If the mpg was 60hrs across the board = SOCIALISM, CONCESSIONS BIG TIME, YOU’RE STEALING FROM ME.
1/3, 1/3, 1/3 = CONCESSIONS, we’re not a true union, Hold the UPA ( some of the guys that voted NO on the previous extension are now the ones saying HOLD the UPA????)
CARES2 = The tax payers should not help us out, SOCIALISM.
Let me go grab some more 🍿.
If the mpg was 60hrs across the board = SOCIALISM, CONCESSIONS BIG TIME, YOU’RE STEALING FROM ME.
1/3, 1/3, 1/3 = CONCESSIONS, we’re not a true union, Hold the UPA ( some of the guys that voted NO on the previous extension are now the ones saying HOLD the UPA????)
CARES2 = The tax payers should not help us out, SOCIALISM.
Let me go grab some more 🍿.
09-09-2020 | 06:11 PM
#169
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
I agree with you. As a 20 yr guy at the top of the bottom 1/3, I'm looking at possible furlough sometime in '21 with 4.5 months of furlough pay at NB Captain rate. Now, if this agreement passes, I could be at 50% NB FO pay in October? No thanks.
09-09-2020 | 06:25 PM
#170
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
This is the point I'm lost with the possible rescinding of displacements. Say 2 guys got hired at United in July of 1999. Call them Bill and Joe. These two were in the same new hire class, basically exact seniority. Joe decided to upgrade to 757 Captain a couple years ago while Bill stayed in the right seat of the 757. Now, post displacement they are both right seat 757 again. With this proposal (possible/hypothetical) it means Joe and Bill are doing the exact same job with the same seniority but because Joe got displaced he would be making more money. Doesn't that violate Union 101 rules, same seniority, same seat, same pay? Now say Joe was a couple years junior...it gets even more unreal. Am I missing the point on this possibility?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
