Agreement in Principle
#201
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 116
Anyone with the drive and discipline to get this far can do better than flipping burgers outside of aviation, even now. Give me a break. It’s easy for people to talk a big game about what they’d do when the company is making record profits, its another when your job is on the line. I worry that this group is all talk and ends up taking something that provides some short term relief, but results in long term pain. Sometimes it’s better to walk away than to buckle and spend a decade paying for it.
#202
Banned
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
You guys needs to chill out until the ACTUAL details and agreement are released. It was stated at the C57 in person meeting yesterday that some of that rumor is false and it is missing all of the details. Also the chairmen was in favor of allowing this agreement to go to a TA. To which the membership in attendance at the meeting also voted in favor of allowing it to go to TA after lengthy discussion.
#203
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 26
Can someone please explain to me what I am missing. Been here for 23 years and a 777 FO. If this AIP rumor is true, am I to understand that some JUNIOR to me will be pay protected in a capt seat even though they can NO LONGER hold that seat? How does this SCHEME save jobs? If this rumor is true, the NC should all be recalled.
#205
I am a bottom third captain, who would by far lose the most if this is past. 30% pay cut back to the right seat, then additional 50% (As rumors would have it). I will wait to review the actual language, but as it stands I would probably vote yes. It sucks to be in the group that is hit the hardest, but a line has to be drawn somewhere and if I believe the agreement is fair for the vast majority of our pilots, I have to accept that Somebody is always going to get the short end of the stick.
“sometimes you eat the bar, sometimes the bar eats you”
#206
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
You can thank council 11 (IAD), 12 (ORD), 57 (LAX), for leaking crap out because they’ve viewed mitigation as CONCESSIONS. Now they wanted to stir the pot by having senior fools negotiating in public, going against your very own model. Shut the H*LL up and write to your LEC if you need to complain. Everyone gets a vote and the majority will decide, the worse thing you can do is telling a bunch of TYPE A mentalities what’s better for them, it will be a private decision wether you like it or not so deal with it. I’m OUT, peace.
#207
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
#208
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
there are all kinds of things that happen out of seniority order due to sheer good/bad luck of the recipient. Should you get a paid move when someone junior to you is displaced? A lot of things happen to pilots out of seniority order… I think you should be careful about using that metric as whether or not you believe something is perfectly fair.
I am a bottom third captain, who would by far lose the most if this is past. 30% pay cut back to the right seat, then additional 50% (As rumors would have it). I will wait to review the actual language, but as it stands I would probably vote yes. It sucks to be in the group that is hit the hardest, but a line has to be drawn somewhere and if I believe the agreement is fair for the vast majority of our pilots, I have to accept that Somebody is always going to get the short end of the stick.
“sometimes you eat the bar, sometimes the bar eats you”
I am a bottom third captain, who would by far lose the most if this is past. 30% pay cut back to the right seat, then additional 50% (As rumors would have it). I will wait to review the actual language, but as it stands I would probably vote yes. It sucks to be in the group that is hit the hardest, but a line has to be drawn somewhere and if I believe the agreement is fair for the vast majority of our pilots, I have to accept that Somebody is always going to get the short end of the stick.
“sometimes you eat the bar, sometimes the bar eats you”
#209
Which seat do they not belong in? The one they bid for and were awarded in a vacancy bid or the seat they were displaced too and may sit in until a training class starts?
#210
What? So when the 309 displacements were canceled in May, "we" paid for them to occupy their displaced seats until they could be trained back into the seats they were awarded though vacancy. I don't understand your reasoning here?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



