It's Done
10-18-2020, 01:22 PM
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,922
Originally Posted by GPullR
Wrong, costs company a good amount more for this LOA then furlouging 4k pilots. Probably why the others don't do it.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
10-18-2020, 01:29 PM
#92
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Wow. You are an absolute ****ing moron if you think this deal costs United more money.
10-18-2020, 02:07 PM
#93
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,138
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Wow. You are an absolute ****ing moron if you think this deal costs United more money.
10-18-2020, 03:22 PM
#95
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,327
Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
I believe there were several ALPA emails detailing this specific point. And outlined at several LEC meetings. Yes, it is costing the company more money to agree to the LOA than furlough. This is what they are willing to pay to have the flexibility for recovery. Please educate yourself.
10-18-2020, 06:10 PM
#96
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
Originally Posted by GPullR
Wrong, costs company a good amount more for this LOA then furlouging 4k pilots. Probably why the others don't do it.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
10-18-2020, 06:29 PM
#97
Orbis Non Sufficit
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 730
Originally Posted by Grumble
Yeah, costs so much UAL stock went up 5% as soon as it was passed.
10-19-2020, 04:17 AM
#98
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
Originally Posted by Nucflash
He may be on to something. In fact, despite demand being a total shambles I’d expect Warren Buffett to imminently buy back in based on this TA passing.....
Got nothing for your greed accusation there?
10-19-2020, 07:01 AM
#99
Orbis Non Sufficit
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 730
Originally Posted by Grumble
Yeah, the MEC said so, it must be true. I mean Americans stock getting hammered when they gave their employees a raise surely can’t be linked. Investors love paying employees and carrying excess cost.
Got nothing for your greed accusation there?
Got nothing for your greed accusation there?
10-19-2020, 10:54 AM
#100
Line Holder
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 59
Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
I believe there were several ALPA emails detailing this specific point. And outlined at several LEC meetings. Yes, it is costing the company more money to agree to the LOA than furlough. This is what they are willing to pay to have the flexibility for recovery. Please educate yourself.
