Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United diversity....... >

United diversity.......

Search

Notices

United diversity.......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2021 | 06:53 PM
  #311  
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by AAL763
The pandering won’t stop. It’s going to get worse. So much for the “no special treatment” argument.... Meanwhile, Captains who’ve been at the company for 30+ years retired early last year after being enticed to do so to protect the younger folks from being furloughed. They retired without so much as a wink. Certainly, no water cannon salute.
that’s not true at all I got a water cannon salute in ORD for a CA that went early. United positive spaced his entire family on the flight.
Old 04-08-2021 | 07:19 PM
  #312  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
Aren't you unintentionally arguing in favor of the Aviate initiative? United is not creating a hiring quota through this program as you are implying. They are committing to providing training opportunities to a certain number of people who will then have the opportunity to interview for a job with United. There are no guaranteed jobs. Basically, they are investing at the zero to CFI level to ensure more diversity among the field of competent and qualified applicants they have to choose from. If you're really all for "pour[ing] all your efforts into expanding equality of opportunity" like you claim, it seems like you'd be all for this.
I was arguing against CantTaxiToACS’s view in favor for racial quotas in hiring not necessarily against the Aviate initiative!
Old 04-08-2021 | 08:00 PM
  #313  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 589
Likes: 1
Default

I still never seen an all male flight. Now that is rare and would deserve a water cannon.
Old 04-08-2021 | 08:25 PM
  #314  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,634
Likes: 210
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
Aren't you unintentionally arguing in favor of the Aviate initiative? United is not creating a hiring quota through this program as you are implying. They are committing to providing training opportunities to a certain number of people who will then have the opportunity to interview for a job with United. There are no guaranteed jobs. Basically, they are investing at the zero to CFI level to ensure more diversity among the field of competent and qualified applicants they have to choose from. If you're really all for "pour[ing] all your efforts into expanding equality of opportunity" like you claim, it seems like you'd be all for this.
There is/will be a process to compete for Aviate. The way it is advertised is that it will not be an equality of opportunity to participate. 50% of those accepted into the program will have more of an opportunity than the other 50%. You confusing two separate issues.
Old 04-08-2021 | 08:35 PM
  #315  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
that’s not true at all I got a water cannon salute in ORD for a CA that went early. United positive spaced his entire family on the flight.
I did a retirement flight for a CA out of SFO....The company positive spaced his entire family.....and then reassigned him. This was pre-Covid. What a kick in the teeth on your way out the door.
Old 04-08-2021 | 08:57 PM
  #316  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
that’s not true at all I got a water cannon salute in ORD for a CA that went early. United positive spaced his entire family on the flight.
SFO has not done water cannon for at least 3 years. Why? Answer is the water shortage. City won’t let them.

Recently retired Captain (2 weeks before the glorious all female flight) did not get one in DEN because it was “too cold, (41 degrees).

Fact checks, this was purely a marketing move by UAL. Considering the fact, yes fact, UAL has been giving preferential hiring since 1978 to minorities and females, because of 1976 legal action (which is still being brought up these days, see link below). In my opinion the problem is there isn’t a very big pool of qualified applicants to fill those slots.

And lest anyone complain they are being left out, in the 90s UAL changed their flight time experience requirements to give a greater weight to single seat fighter types because of the difference in accumulated flight hours with heavy transport types.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/black-p...ited-airlines/

Like COVID, this kind of stuff will never end. Probably going to revisit the age discrimination lawsuit again.

BTW, I believe this wasn’t the “first” all female flight crew. I seem to remember such a thing made the Company news years go. But maybe this time they arrange so the rest of the staff was also all female and that’s what makes it something special. So, were they (as in a generic non-binary kind of “they”) on time? That’s really all the customers care about.

Found it! From 2016. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/united-...-women-pilots/

Was the public lied to yesterday?

Last edited by Regularguy; 04-08-2021 at 09:08 PM.
Old 04-08-2021 | 11:03 PM
  #317  
6010C's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Default

Outsider looking in.

So the “problem” is that in 5 years or so there may be a slight increase in the percentages of women and minorities hired on behind you guys on the seniority list?
Old 04-09-2021 | 03:05 AM
  #318  
ItnStln's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
Good question. The way I "heard it" on the news interview was that only minority candidates may receive scholarships. Poor white people are not eligible since they lack a minority classification.
Which is racist.
Old 04-09-2021 | 03:07 AM
  #319  
ItnStln's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 6010C
Outsider looking in.

So the “problem” is that in 5 years or so there may be a slight increase in the percentages of women and minorities hired on behind you guys on the seniority list?
The problem is that they're being given an unfair advantage due to their demographics.
Old 04-09-2021 | 03:28 AM
  #320  
hummingbear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
There is/will be a process to compete for Aviate. The way it is advertised is that it will not be an equality of opportunity to participate. 50% of those accepted into the program will have more of an opportunity than the other 50%. You confusing two separate issues.
Not at all. We were talking about the difference between investing in increasing early-stage opportunities and merely offering quota-based jobs to under-qualified individuals. My point is, the Aviate initiative is a quota-based program, but at the training stage- not the employment stage. It doesn’t guarantee anyone a job, but the intention is that the program can help individuals from certain groups become more competitive by the time they reach the interview stage. IOW, increasing the number of competitive minority candidates eventually translates into more minorities employed through merit-based hiring.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
iahflyr
United
117
02-04-2018 04:52 AM
flightmedic01
United
19
08-11-2014 12:16 PM
Rotor2prop
Major
13
07-11-2012 10:55 AM
Freight Dog
Money Talk
20
11-08-2011 01:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices