Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United diversity....... >

United diversity.......

Search
Notices

United diversity.......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2021, 04:11 AM
  #211  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: 737 Cap
Posts: 451
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear View Post
To be clear, I’m not for lowering standards at all. So once again for perspective, it bears reviewing what United has actually committed to doing. Over the next ten years, they plan to find from a population of 330 million, 2,500 women & people from minority demographics, train them to fly to FAA standards, and give them a chance to interview for a position at UAL. If you honestly don’t think that can be done without sacrificing safety, you may need to examine your world view.

I think that was very well said.

I also have significant issues with the way we are hiring. To put an emphasis on hiring from Aviate completely disregards the effort that many have already committed to this process when the rules were different. United unilaterally shut down tsa and expressjet. We (United) basically vertical filed the careers of many well established aviators, and continue to do so through the Hogan test. I have many friends who are far better people and aviators than I that have been passed over by the Hogan test. Until we fully employ those that have been fighting for a chance at UAL for in many cases decades, I just don’t see the need for Aviate.
Scott Stoops is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 04:17 AM
  #212  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear View Post
To be clear, I’m not for lowering standards at all. So once again for perspective, it bears reviewing what United has actually committed to doing. Over the next ten years, they plan to find from a population of 330 million, 2,500 women & people from minority demographics, train them to fly to FAA standards, and give them a chance to interview for a position at UAL. If you honestly don’t think that can be done without sacrificing safety, you may need to examine your world view.
Is that a legitimate and worthy expenditure of the company's resources and the employees profit sharing?
There may be X number of women on the planet. There may be Y number of other so-called racial minorities.
Other people who are on a mission, I guess you would call them the non X and Y people just want to go out and find their way, and earn their stripes. Those people are motivated enough to see to it that they are trained to FAA standards. Another words, they don't seem to have a problem turning their dreams into reality on their own dime and own time.

Examine a world view where you are self motivated, and a self starter, and you take control over your own destiny by investing in yourself. Earn what you get and get what you earn.

I used to think they don't pay the check-airman enough. Now I am convinced of it. I wonder if they will be resigning in droves because of the increased risk and liability. I am sure our check airman were consulted on this program right? Just like the line pilots were?
baseball is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 04:20 AM
  #213  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by iHateAMR View Post
I feel like I have to pipe in as a male of color. I feel like a I had a damn solid resume, solid GPA, Masters in Aero Sci, 121 Internship, Military Heavy Pilot, 121 Regional Capt, but I got passed up (had later interviews) by white females. I didn’t know what to think, not a single one of them had their masters, PIC, or an internship. They were literally hired for being a female. It’s hard for me to lump them all together, because some of my closest friends in aviation are female pilots, and they’re damn good. But this was the quota for two airlines that early on decided to make it 50/50 by taking any female with a pulse. Thankfully I moved on to an airline that actually cared about my skills, but I’ll never forget that right seat revolving door of minorities passing me up to meet quotas.

I just want to see the NBA hire more white males and people who are vertically challenged.
All of the internships at my college when to females. None of the males were accepted. That was back in 1991. Of the three that went. None are here today at UAL, and none are professional pilots anywhere. I know. We're all still good friends.
baseball is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 04:27 AM
  #214  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by DALFA View Post
If 80% of the applicants are white males then why should only 50% of those hired be white males? Wouldn't it just make sense to forget about peoples race and sex all together and just judge an application based on merits?

Does being a female make you a better or safer pilot?

Does being a minority make you a better or safer pilot?

This entire notion that diversity is better and that we're gonna impose quotas to have more diversity is absolutely insane.
You might laugh. Maybe not. But, I read a masters thesis whereby a student made the case that female pilots were indeed safer pilots.
baseball is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 04:27 AM
  #215  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 429
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp View Post
History has shown in nearly every profession, when forcibly diversifying entry programs in XYZ, standards are lowered to achieve that goal. That’s not emotional, it’s just reality. It probably has more to do with the fact that if your goal of to expand whatever demographic that also happens to be a minority (in numerical terms) disproportionately to the applicant pool, they will likely not have same cut line in terms of performance. The example that you gave above is only equitable if the pool of applicants (momen & minorities vs white males) are equally sized. Seems like it would make sense to just let everyone compete with one another and let the best applicants rise to the top (I’m only referring to Aviate here). I don’t really see why anyone would want it any other way.
I counter this thinking with the development of the civilian pilot training program that allowed the Tuskegee airmen to be created. Compared to their counterparts in the military they out performed everyone and never lost a bomber in combat. They became so desired by their Caucasian counterparts that they where given the name “by request” because they knew that they would come home if escorted by the Red Tails. They were requested multiple times and never failed... over 1500 missions. Many of your grandfathers were escorted by these men.

The standards were not lowered when the military included minority pilots.. the standards were shattered in that era and there is historical data to back it up.

http://www.tuskegeetopgun.com/tuskegee_airmen.php
Flydafe is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 04:27 AM
  #216  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DALFA's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: I'm here, i'm there, i'm everywhere...
Posts: 1,508
Default

Originally Posted by tonsterboy5 View Post
The whole idea of this initiative is to get a more diverse group of applicants. Right now it’s 80% but if United gets other than white men into flight training who might not otherwise afford it or have ability to attend flight training the numbers will slowly change. There are so few minorities in flight training and United wants to change that. They will still require time at a regional or similar experience to move on.
Employers should hire those with the best resume and skill set. Period. The color of your skin or the fact that you have a vagina instead of a penis should not be part of the hiring process.

For all those that say "oh this won't lead to lowering standards" all you have to do is look at Universities. If you're Asian you need a higher SAT/ACT score to get accepted into a University. If you're black, they'll settle for less. All in the name of "diversity". You don't think that will happen when it comes time to hire for the cockpit? Stop being delusional.
DALFA is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 04:30 AM
  #217  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by Bestglide View Post
it was a 757-200. One of the newer ones and was written off. There’s a video somewhere showing it being torn apart and thrown away....very sad.
It was a 200. You're right. I stand corrected.

Interesting. I searched NTSB database last night. No accident report. It is listed as a reportable accident (hull loss). However, no report on file. No tapes either. Looks like UAL is doing a great job at burying this. You can't even get the IP's at the school house to present anything on it. It's like it never happened. WOW!
baseball is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 04:38 AM
  #218  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

I recall a simulator check out and a panel of Senior Airline Captains at the interview. Some HR person looked at the paperwork after the interview was over. That's how it should be done.

Notice how the FB forums that are involved in UAL are all shut down now. Provda has shutdown any pilot who discussed this topic on FB.

The FB moderators tell people to "call their union reps." Like, yeah, our snaggle tooth union reps are going to do what exactly?

Interesting. The company is going to finance this endeavor out of what money? Could it be our profit sharing? This Aviate program isn't going to be run for free. So, really, in the end, the pilots have to subsidize it anyway. Glad they asked us permission.

These candidates....They will sure be solid union members right? Nah. They gonna be beholding to the boss man for their job. It's a new kind of slavery. They got you by the balls before you even get hired. Management owns these guys and gals and they ain't even hired yet. ALPA hasn't said "boo" about all this. Interesting.............
baseball is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 04:54 AM
  #219  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AAL763's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by baseball View Post
ALPA hasn't said "boo" about all this. Interesting.............
The unions are most likely in on the whole charade. Just look at who leads them. The likes of Sara Nelson at CWA, Joe DePete/Todd Insler at ALPA... They’ve already applauded it.

Last edited by AAL763; 04-08-2021 at 05:07 AM.
AAL763 is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 05:08 AM
  #220  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 703
Default

Originally Posted by TrumpLostLOL View Post
Have you ever heard of this crash by a company named Colgan Air? Yea, both pilots were white, and they are kinda the reason for the brutal ATP mins we have now.
Brutal ATP mins? You clearly are not an airline pilot, just a troll!
Desdi is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
iahflyr
United
117
02-04-2018 04:52 AM
flightmedic01
United
19
08-11-2014 12:16 PM
Rotor2prop
Major
13
07-11-2012 10:55 AM
Freight Dog
Money Talk
20
11-08-2011 01:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices