Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United diversity....... >

United diversity.......

Search
Notices

United diversity.......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2021, 05:16 AM
  #221  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 704
Default

Originally Posted by HanYolo View Post
Except, you are upset over CENTURIES of oppression against black people in South Africa and they are finally trying to change it back. The Dutch invaded South Africa in the mid 1650s and enslaved and colonized. I am sorry to hear you are struggling with this, but after about 350 years, I get that they have had enough.
Nope he is talking about the here and now!
Desdi is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 05:32 AM
  #222  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 429
Default

Originally Posted by baseball View Post
I recall a simulator check out and a panel of Senior Airline Captains at the interview. Some HR person looked at the paperwork after the interview was over. That's how it should be done.

Notice how the FB forums that are involved in UAL are all shut down now. Provda has shutdown any pilot who discussed this topic on FB.

The FB moderators tell people to "call their union reps." Like, yeah, our snaggle tooth union reps are going to do what exactly?

Interesting. The company is going to finance this endeavor out of what money? Could it be our profit sharing? This Aviate program isn't going to be run for free. So, really, in the end, the pilots have to subsidize it anyway. Glad they asked us permission.

These candidates....They will sure be solid union members right? Nah. They gonna be beholding to the boss man for their job. It's a new kind of slavery. They got you by the balls before you even get hired. Management owns these guys and gals and they ain't even hired yet. ALPA hasn't said "boo" about all this. Interesting.............
I think they are going to use the CARES Act monies and if this is what you envision slavery to be then it ain’t that bad at all... Crew meals and nice hotels.. good pay and retirement. Sure beats picking cotton and tobacco for free
Flydafe is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 05:52 AM
  #223  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 236
Default

It may all be hot air. British Airways and Qantas announced similar hiring targets a few years ago. They got all the good PR and praise from political parties.

What happened next? They kept on doing what they did before. No changes, recruit the best who show up.
climb150 is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 06:03 AM
  #224  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AAL763's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by climb150 View Post
It may all be hot air. British Airways and Qantas announced similar hiring targets a few years ago. They got all the good PR and praise from political parties.

What happened next? They kept on doing what they did before. No changes, recruit the best who show up.
Well this has surely backfired on United. The ratio they’re getting on FB/Twitter is significant. People are not happy. Well deserved though. When a company goes woke, they go “broke.” If the target was to anger as many of their customers as possible, they hit the nail right on the head.
AAL763 is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 06:38 AM
  #225  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,354
Default

Originally Posted by Flydafe View Post
I counter this thinking with the development of the civilian pilot training program that allowed the Tuskegee airmen to be created. Compared to their counterparts in the military they out performed everyone and never lost a bomber in combat. They became so desired by their Caucasian counterparts that they where given the name “by request” because they knew that they would come home if escorted by the Red Tails. They were requested multiple times and never failed... over 1500 missions. Many of your grandfathers were escorted by these men.

The standards were not lowered when the military included minority pilots.. the standards were shattered in that era and there is historical data to back it up.

History of The Tuskegee Airmen
I’m not posing an argument. You and I are talking about different things. I’m talking about the ability to enter the program, not whether or not someone can graduate and become a pilot. I’m just highlighting what has statistically happened when you favor a minority (talking about numbers, not race) applicant pool to something that has a competitive admission with some kind of measured criteria to entry.

This is about college admissions, but you can search the lead authors name and find any number of studies that show the same thing.

https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/..._2004_full.pdf
ThumbsUp is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 06:54 AM
  #226  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ItnStln's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,584
Default

Originally Posted by Ua10810 View Post
I was born a white male in South Africa and had to leave my entire damn family to move to another country to get a job as a pilot. I would never have the opportunity to be a pilot in the country I was born because I am white.
The same thing will happen here.
ItnStln is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 06:56 AM
  #227  
Gets Rolled on the Reg.
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 274
Default

Originally Posted by KSwift76 View Post
I understand your frustration. I hear you when you say you feel like you are being discriminated against. I just can't figure out how. You, (I assume you are a white male) are still getting 50% of the opportunity. Everyone else has to split 50% of the opportunity.
.
Sounds like you're confusing equality of opportunity with equality of outcome.
There already is equality of opportunity. Anyone, male or female, of any color, has the opportunity to apply at United Airlines.
Forcing the 50% female/color narrative forces the outcome of being awarded an interview.
And let me be clear, if UAL was saying we are going to award interviews to XX% white males, I would be equally opposed to it.
Let's also be clear that this is a zero sum dynamic, for every candidate accepted, another is turned down, there are not unlimited slots.
The exclusions of our profession should be purely based on qualifications and competence. Period.
Any forced outcome of being awarded an interview based on gender or color, male/female/white/black or otherwise is clearly discriminatory.
1257 is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 07:04 AM
  #228  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 471
Default

Originally Posted by AAL763 View Post
Well this has surely backfired on United. The ratio they’re getting on FB/Twitter is significant. People are not happy. Well deserved though. When a company goes woke, they go “broke.” If the target was to anger as many of their customers as possible, they hit the nail right on the head.
Yep negative views and threats of boycotts on FB and Twitter always translates to action. Did you count the number of blue check marks since you clearly have too much time on your hands?
JurgenKlopp is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 07:07 AM
  #229  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 694
Default

The Aviate messaging seems more of a broad public message that all are welcome to come visit the cockpit and consider our profession. If it gets highly qualified individuals interested from non-traditional aviation backgrounds into the program at the ground level then we’re casting a bigger net and getting potential great pilots. That’s not a bad thing.

This profession is less accessible than many for so many reasons and has historically been passed down father to son pretty often. I sometimes feel like the odd man out not having a father who was in the industry. That’s sort of telling.

Aviate’s diversity aim is a fraction of a fraction of our future hiring, literally. It’s one source and anyone in that pipeline has to meet the same high standards we all meet once they (eventually, having met all requirements) set foot in a cockpit on the line for UAL.
Chuck D is offline  
Old 04-08-2021, 07:19 AM
  #230  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 165
Default

Originally Posted by KSwift76 View Post
Not at all. Here to tell the other side of the coin. I rarely post, but read a lot. If you search my post history, you will find several posts on other threads basically stating the same things I'm saying here. Giving other people an opportunity is not racist. Advocating for everyone to have a chance is not racist. Not once did I say white males should not have an opportunity or be excluded. In fact, 50% of the applicants will he white males. Also I did not say people should be accepted or hired if they are unqualified. My family rides on the back of our jets. I sure want a good, competent knowledgeable FO to help and give input based on their experience when things go wrong. I just believe that other people can also do this job and perhaps lack of opportunity or exposure or financing or maybe reading this thread makes them not want too. I don't proclaim to know what my colleagues are thinking at work. I know what has been said to me directly and indirectly. I know what I've heard when they know I'm on the room and when they don't know I'm in the room. I do not know everyone's intent. I do know what I hear from a large number of my fellow pilots.

It has to change. Thankfully UAL is taking positive steps to invest in people that have the ability to get qualified to operate our jets. White, Black, Brown, Gay, Straight, etc.... If you're qualified, you get a chance. I just don't want the same people who have traditionally held the keys to the gates with attitudes like several on here making those decisions. Again 50% minorities and women 50% (I assume white males) into the Academy with a chance to get into the pipeline. Hardly excluding anyone.
the problem with your philosophy is it negates the fact everyone has an equal chance in this country. I came from middle class and worked and trained snd college sleeping five hours a night for years taking in the debt to grt hired snd make half what I was making for years and having to work a second job to pay for the occasional meal cuase there wasn't enough. i just paid off my loans like an adult last year.. its a matter of effort drive and desire not handouts and hand ups.

The entire country needs to drop the affirmative action that gives college and jobs out on the basis of not being white. No white gets a handout or hangup. Race sex etc should never be asked in anything. It should be qualifications only. That is THE ONLY non racist way to work. Hiring based on not being a white straight male, Obap, ngpa, and every other box checking philosophy is racist. Not once does any it'll these Airlines support a white straight male pilot association buy handing out jobs, interviews and type rides.

Racism is racism regardless of which side you flip the coin to
XJ86 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
iahflyr
United
117
02-04-2018 04:52 AM
flightmedic01
United
19
08-11-2014 12:16 PM
Rotor2prop
Major
13
07-11-2012 10:55 AM
Freight Dog
Money Talk
20
11-08-2011 01:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices