Search

Notices

UAL Vaccination

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2021 | 09:34 AM
  #431  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,233
Likes: 66
Default

Originally Posted by flightmedic01
“If the grandparents are vaccinated, then what’s the problem?” How are the people in this category at any significant risk if they are vaccinated?? Is there a minuscule risk that they may contract covid from another person? Of course, thats true with most viruses/vaccines.
While not all of them may be old enough to be grandparents, we now have FIVE high profile people in a control group that were vaxx’d and now have COVID.

Be interesting to see how that whole thing pans out.

And what are/were the chances that FIVE people that are vaxx’d would have got it despite even Fauci saying the chances are extremely low you’ll contract the virus?
Old 07-19-2021 | 10:30 AM
  #432  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by flightmedic01
ob·tuse
/əbˈt(y)o͞os,äbˈt(y)o͞os/

adjective

- annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand.

I’m not sure how I fit that description, at least in this context (though my ex-wife may disagree ). I don’t believe I’m being “annoyingly insensitive” when I asked the obvious question: “If the grandparents are vaccinated, then what’s the problem?” How are the people in this category at any significant risk if they are vaccinated?? Is there a minuscule risk that they may contract covid from another person? Of course, thats true with most viruses/vaccines. However, it is completely unethical to vaccinate one group of people in order to protect another group. That is undeniable. As far as being “slow to understand”, I think you may mean I am hesitant to agree with your point of view, which is true. But that doesn’t mean I don’t understand. Many things in life can be understood, yet not agreed with/condoned.
It's a risk assessment issue - and YOU don't get to dictate someone else's risk tolerance (not even granny and pappy's). What you dismiss as miniscule may be a big concern to others. So yes, they may have something to worry about.

If you don't want the vaccine - fine, I respect your choice although I disagree. Likewise I'm sure you respect my choice to get vaccinated. Our individual choices are only part of the equation though - the public health macro perspective doesn't really hinge on flightmedic or axl's individual choice but looks at 'community' statistics. I'm ok if you defend your choice. However, I know that if too many people within a community share that perspective we will all suffer the consequences of a spreading & mutating virus.
Old 07-19-2021 | 10:44 AM
  #433  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,633
Likes: 209
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
It's a risk assessment issue - and YOU don't get to dictate someone else's risk tolerance (not even granny and pappy's). What you dismiss as miniscule may be a big concern to others. So yes, they may have something to worry about.

If you don't want the vaccine - fine, I respect your choice although I disagree. Likewise I'm sure you respect my choice to get vaccinated. Our individual choices are only part of the equation though - the public health macro perspective doesn't really hinge on flightmedic or axl's individual choice but looks at 'community' statistics. I'm ok if you defend your choice. However, I know that if too many people within a community share that perspective we will all suffer the consequences of a spreading & mutating virus.
Quite the quandary here. The anti-vaxxers probably also don’t like masks, lockdowns and the like, nor do I. But the pandemic is now the pandemic of the unvaccinated, so as long as a large portion of the country still denies the efficacy of the vaccines, we’re going to be dealing with this BS for a while.

If everyone (I realize this will never happen) had either gotten the vaccine or achieved natural immunity, this thing would just fizzle out.
Old 07-19-2021 | 11:11 AM
  #434  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,233
Likes: 66
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
But the pandemic is now the pandemic of the unvaccinated
Well, more than likely true.

But see above. What are the chances that five, FIVE vaccinated people came down with COVID? I could see maybe one or 2, but five?
Old 07-19-2021 | 11:15 AM
  #435  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,633
Likes: 209
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
Well, more than likely true.

But see above. What are the chances that five, FIVE vaccinated people came down with COVID? I could see maybe one or 2, but five?

There’s lots more than 5. The issue is that the amount of those people that end up in the hospital or dead is infinitesimally small when compared to those who have been vaccinated. If the vaccine just makes this a cold for people, we can start just putting this stuff in the rear view mirror.
Old 07-19-2021 | 11:24 AM
  #436  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,233
Likes: 66
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
There’s lots more than 5.
I KNOW.

I was simply referencing a SPECIFIC example.

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
The issue is that the amount of those people that end up in the hospital or dead is infinitesimally small when compared to those who have been vaccinated.
True. Sadly, the amount of healthy/non-obese people that contracted it before being vaxx'd never really felt anything worse than a cold either....

We have yet to see how these 5 may be affected. Hopefully it rings valid that the symptoms are mild to nil.
Old 07-19-2021 | 11:49 AM
  #437  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,633
Likes: 209
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
I KNOW.

I was simply referencing a SPECIFIC example.



True. Sadly, the amount of healthy/non-obese people that contracted it before being vaxx'd never really felt anything worse than a cold either....

We have yet to see how these 5 may be affected. Hopefully it rings valid that the symptoms are mild to nil.

Why just look at 5, though. Around 3700 breakthrough cases reported to the CDC died or were hospitalized attributablr to COVID-19. It’s gonna happen, it’s just a much smaller number.
Old 07-19-2021 | 11:51 AM
  #438  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,233
Likes: 66
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
Why just look at 5, though. Around 3700 breakthrough cases reported to the CDC died or were hospitalized attributablr to COVID-19. It’s gonna happen, it’s just a much smaller number.
Agree, but due to their higher profile it’ll ACTUALLY get attention.
Old 07-19-2021 | 12:49 PM
  #439  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
Well, more than likely true.

But see above. What are the chances that five, FIVE vaccinated people came down with COVID? I could see maybe one or 2, but five?
If they were all together and exposed to a high viral load? i wouldn't be surprised. I hope they are all asymptomatic or experience very mild symptoms and recover soon!
Old 07-19-2021 | 01:58 PM
  #440  
flightmedic01's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
From: Reclining
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
It's a risk assessment issue - and YOU don't get to dictate someone else's risk tolerance (not even granny and pappy's). What you dismiss as miniscule may be a big concern to others. So yes, they may have something to worry about.

If you don't want the vaccine - fine, I respect your choice although I disagree. Likewise I'm sure you respect my choice to get vaccinated. Our individual choices are only part of the equation though - the public health macro perspective doesn't really hinge on flightmedic or axl's individual choice but looks at 'community' statistics. I'm ok if you defend your choice. However, I know that if too many people within a community share that perspective we will all suffer the consequences of a spreading & mutating virus.
I totally agree that it’s a risk assessment issue. Each person is responsible for determining what risks they are willing to assume. I am not dictating someone else’s “risk tolerance”, as that is up to the individual.

Let’s take a hypothetical scenario of an immune compromised patient who lives in your neighborhood. Do you require everyone on the block to wear a mask/social distance/etc so that person doesn’t get sick or does the individual patient limit their risks and avoid contact with others.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fortyeight
Republic Airways
203
09-23-2018 06:28 PM
ReserveDog
United
46
05-23-2014 07:23 AM
Airhoss
United
210
09-04-2012 06:48 AM
TruthHurts
United
49
04-04-2012 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices