Search
Notices

TRO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2021, 02:18 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 119
Default

Is the court hearing happening today?

Any updates on that?
Heavyflyer is offline  
Old 10-13-2021, 04:09 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,352
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16 View Post
That doesn't mean they will be approved.
Right, but it the context of the TRO, it doesn’t matter.
ThumbsUp is offline  
Old 10-14-2021, 02:19 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: B-737 Captain
Posts: 649
Default

Originally Posted by UASCOMPILOT View Post
I can spell "butt" and use it in a sentence also ...."I'm home sitting on my butt collecting 30k a month for the next 12 years!"

Not to mention damages...thats next!
riiiiight. Let us know how that works out for ya. Get the shot or move along. That's the choice. Watch and see.
guppie is offline  
Old 10-14-2021, 03:10 AM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Down N Out
Posts: 145
Default

Originally Posted by guppie View Post
riiiiight. Let us know how that works out for ya. Get the shot or move along. That's the choice. Watch and see.
The fact that you are gleeful about your fellow airman losing their job is really disturbing. Please re-evaluate your life brother
beetlehog is offline  
Old 10-14-2021, 03:36 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Default

Originally Posted by beetlehog View Post
The fact that you are gleeful about your fellow airman losing their job is really disturbing. Please re-evaluate your life brother
He's simply reacting to taunting from a smug dbag.
AxlF16 is offline  
Old 10-14-2021, 04:44 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bestglide's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: 756 left...
Posts: 442
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16 View Post
He's simply reacting to taunting from a smug dbag.
Falli n line “Comrad” or be fired. That’s a great “reaction’.
Bestglide is offline  
Old 10-14-2021, 05:01 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LeeFXDWG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B737 CAPT IAH
Posts: 1,130
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp View Post
Yes, if you read my other post, I made it clearer…. it’s my understanding that everyone (at this point) has requested an accommodation that had not been vaccinated, so they fall under the TRO.

Could be fake news though.
Then I may have misread your post. Apologies. There are a handful of pilots who do fall in the no vax no RAP category. The MEC has filed a grievance regarding that small group. Last I heard single digits. Anyway, my point was only that there is a clear distinction relative to the Sambrano case.
LeeFXDWG is offline  
Old 10-14-2021, 05:08 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Default

Originally Posted by LeeFXDWG View Post
Then I may have misread your post. Apologies. There are a handful of pilots who do fall in the no vax no RAP category. The MEC has filed a grievance regarding that small group. Last I heard single digits. Anyway, my point was only that there is a clear distinction relative to the Sambrano case.
Isnt it likely that the ~250 in the termination process 'slide' under the TRO umbrella since United was enjoined from refusing to accept late medical or religious accomodations? Wouldn't they be foolish to not apply for medical accomodation?
AxlF16 is offline  
Old 10-14-2021, 05:33 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hummingbear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,315
Default

Originally Posted by UASCOMPILOT View Post
I can spell "butt" and use it in a sentence also ...."I'm home sitting on my butt collecting 30k a month for the next 12 years!"

Not to mention damages...thats next!
Uh, not how that would play out at all. You’d lose any trip touching a blacklisted destination without pay. If that requires union ratification, it will be overwhelmingly supported. I don’t want you to lose your job, but I think I speak for the majority when I say you’ll work for your pay like the rest of us.

As to the larger issue, this TRO isn’t a win for either side- it’s a delay of proceedings while the court decides on the question of jurisdiction. Can the state of Texas determine legality of an employment policy from an international airline based in Chicago? It has the makings for a prolonged legal fight that works its way to the top. Even if Texas does rule against UAL, it’s more likely to have staying power for employees who work entirely in the state (rampers, ticketing agents, etc.) than interstate employees like pilots & FAs.
hummingbear is offline  
Old 10-14-2021, 06:00 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LeeFXDWG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B737 CAPT IAH
Posts: 1,130
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16 View Post
Isnt it likely that the ~250 in the termination process 'slide' under the TRO umbrella since United was enjoined from refusing to accept late medical or religious accomodations? Wouldn't they be foolish to not apply for medical accomodation?
The key being they would have to apply. Whether or not they elect to do so? If they don’t, they wouldn’t be considered part of the class IMHO.
LeeFXDWG is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DarinFred
American
12
06-21-2019 07:23 AM
awax
Spirit
11
05-30-2017 08:02 PM
757HI
American
30
08-30-2015 09:16 AM
7576FO
American
6
10-16-2012 08:57 PM
cactiboss
Major
447
01-09-2012 07:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices