TRO
10-19-2021, 04:22 AM
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B737 CAPT IAH
Posts: 1,130
Originally Posted by AxlF16
Isnt it likely that the ~250 in the termination process 'slide' under the TRO umbrella since United was enjoined from refusing to accept late medical or religious accomodations? Wouldn't they be foolish to not apply for medical accomodation?
Just thought I’d give an update:
ORDER: The Court concludes that Defendant's Motion should be and is GRANTED in part. ECF No.70 . Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the above-quoted language from the second operative paragraph of the Temporary Restraining Order applies only to those individuals who submitted accommodation requests to Defendant on or before September 23, 2021, and that Defendant is not required to reopen its accommodation review process to consider requests made by individuals on or after September 24, 2021. All other relief requested in Defendant's Motion is DENIED. ECF No.70 . (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/18/2021) (pef)
10-19-2021, 09:02 AM
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Originally Posted by LeeFXDWG
Hey Axl
Just thought I’d give an update:
ORDER: The Court concludes that Defendant's Motion should be and is GRANTED in part. ECF No.70 . Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the above-quoted language from the second operative paragraph of the Temporary Restraining Order applies only to those individuals who submitted accommodation requests to Defendant on or before September 23, 2021, and that Defendant is not required to reopen its accommodation review process to consider requests made by individuals on or after September 24, 2021. All other relief requested in Defendant's Motion is DENIED. ECF No.70 . (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/18/2021) (pef)
Just thought I’d give an update:
ORDER: The Court concludes that Defendant's Motion should be and is GRANTED in part. ECF No.70 . Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the above-quoted language from the second operative paragraph of the Temporary Restraining Order applies only to those individuals who submitted accommodation requests to Defendant on or before September 23, 2021, and that Defendant is not required to reopen its accommodation review process to consider requests made by individuals on or after September 24, 2021. All other relief requested in Defendant's Motion is DENIED. ECF No.70 . (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/18/2021) (pef)
10-20-2021, 03:57 PM
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 963
Recognizing exemptions to the free exercise of inalienable rights moves those rights outside the shield of inalienability and paves the way for further infringement. Employees who refused the jab and also refused the exemptions are true patriots so brave and incorruptible that their rarity forced them to fight alone. The rest of you stay drunk on propaganda, trying to forget your inequities and erase the ever burdening shame of compliance. It hurts you to think about these lost brothers who made a principled stand while you continue to cower and obey. Admit it.
10-20-2021, 07:41 PM
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,316
Originally Posted by Wingedbeast
[Racial and gender inequities] don't actually exist, it's just something those who suffer from a oppression delusion like to spout about their own personal failures.
"Victim complex".... gotta love that projection from someone who probably spouts blm talking points.
"Victim complex".... gotta love that projection from someone who probably spouts blm talking points.
10-20-2021, 10:18 PM
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2021
Posts: 100
Originally Posted by fadec
Recognizing exemptions to the free exercise of inalienable rights moves those rights outside the shield of inalienability and paves the way for further infringement.
10-21-2021, 07:34 AM
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
I haven't seen the full order. This is a summary from Pacer Monitor but looks complete.
MEDIATION ORDER: The Court REFERS this case for mediation and APPOINTS Hon. Kent Hance, Chancellor-Emeritus, as Lead Mediator and Hon. Royal Furgeson Related [+], Dean-Emeritus, as Local Mediator. Counsel for the parties are ORDERED to attend an initial, in-person mediation on or before October 26, 2021, at a time and location to be determined by the Lead Mediator. The parties are ORDERED to contact the office of Chancellor Hance by October 22, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. The parties are further ORDERED to submit Preliminary Mediation Reports to Chancellor Hance by October 25, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. Finally, no later than October 29, 2021, at 12:00 p.m., the parties are ORDERED to file a Joint Mediation Report. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/20/2021) (pef)
MEDIATION ORDER: The Court REFERS this case for mediation and APPOINTS Hon. Kent Hance, Chancellor-Emeritus, as Lead Mediator and Hon. Royal Furgeson Related [+], Dean-Emeritus, as Local Mediator. Counsel for the parties are ORDERED to attend an initial, in-person mediation on or before October 26, 2021, at a time and location to be determined by the Lead Mediator. The parties are ORDERED to contact the office of Chancellor Hance by October 22, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. The parties are further ORDERED to submit Preliminary Mediation Reports to Chancellor Hance by October 25, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. Finally, no later than October 29, 2021, at 12:00 p.m., the parties are ORDERED to file a Joint Mediation Report. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/20/2021) (pef)
10-21-2021, 01:13 PM
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 157
Originally Posted by Wingedbeast
Those don't actually exist, it's just something those who suffer from a oppression delusion like to spout about their own personal failures.
"Victim complex".... gotta love that projection from someone who probably spouts blm talking points.
"Victim complex".... gotta love that projection from someone who probably spouts blm talking points.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
