Search

Notices

UAL: Pay Raise Percent

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2022 | 07:04 PM
  #41  
hummingbear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by fadec
The regional pay rates look great in 2025, but no regional will exist in 2025. They're done, and we can make them done faster by accepting a modest 5% raise in order to remain cost competitive with our regional brethren. Look, I worked for 11 years at the regionals for **** pay and no job security. I came here to retire. And in order to make that happen I'm prepared to remain cost competitive with Skywest labor until age 67 if it takes that long. So what if I don't own a boat. So what if I live in a trailer park and commute. The lost decade trained me to live within my means and that's a huge advantage. Skywest to $300k/yr. ??? Great. I can live on $180k easily. That's huge money in my book. If it gets me to age 67 without strikes and furloughs that's fine. You watch. Those $300k regional wonders are a flash in the pan. Slow and steady wins the race.
Excellent point. In fact, let’s take pay cuts to better ensure our longevity. We can all retire in a common shelter built of TUMI bags.
Reply
Old 09-07-2022 | 08:04 PM
  #42  
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
From: MEC Chairman, Snack Basket Committee
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
Excellent point. In fact, let’s take pay cuts to better ensure our longevity. We can all retire in a common shelter built of TUMI bags.
LOL

Filler
Reply
Old 09-07-2022 | 09:36 PM
  #43  
crflyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
Yes. They call themselves “the negotiating committee”.
ok, I liked that one
Reply
Old 09-08-2022 | 02:25 AM
  #44  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by GPullR
Huh??
What numbers are you looking at??
There are a lot more premium pay incentives at the regionals in many cases. I would regularly credit 120-140 hours /month. At their current pay rates that puts them WAY above junior narrowbody Captain pay at legacies. And regional LCAs are making $500,000+ /year now. More than most widebody Captains. Contracts aren’t just about pay rates.
Reply
Old 09-08-2022 | 02:32 AM
  #45  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by fadec
The regional pay rates look great in 2025, but no regional will exist in 2025. They're done, and we can make them done faster by accepting a modest 5% raise in order to remain cost competitive with our regional brethren. Look, I worked for 11 years at the regionals for **** pay and no job security. I came here to retire. And in order to make that happen I'm prepared to remain cost competitive with Skywest labor until age 67 if it takes that long. So what if I don't own a boat. So what if I live in a trailer park and commute. The lost decade trained me to live within my means and that's a huge advantage. Skywest to $300k/yr. ??? Great. I can live on $180k easily. That's huge money in my book. If it gets me to age 67 without strikes and furloughs that's fine. You watch. Those $300k regional wonders are a flash in the pan. Slow and steady wins the race.
This is literal absurdity and incredibly flawed thinking. $180,000 or even $300,000 really isn’t that much money. I made over $170,000 my last year at a regional BEFORE these new pay rates.

We would all need 30%+ pay raises just to get back to where this profession was 20 years ago. Inflation is killing the purchasing power of our hard earned dollars. So as I have stated before, do a pay comparison. Even a 20% raise will mean that regional Captains are still making more than legacy Captains in some cases.

And yes, regionals are going to shrink. But at airlines like AA they are incredibly dependent on regional lift to generate revenue. While Delta and United have seen fit to bring that flying in-house, American is running the opposite direction. They have no choice. So there will be regional airlines around in some capacity moving forward. And they likely WILL have to be paid well to staff the flying. These pay rates may not be going away as fast as some think.
Reply
Old 09-08-2022 | 04:15 AM
  #46  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
Do you expect to see a 30% increase in rates plus all of the other stuff that people are demanding, or just TA1 but with more money? If you think that even in this market that we’re going to get 30% DOS + cost of living increases, eliminate the concessions in TA1, and significantly improve our current rules, just skip reading the next deal and vote no. 10% will probably get voted down, 20 would be better, but I’m expecting to see TA1 rolled back out with 15% DOS +5% increases, LCA’s paid by the trip, no scope gives, current book on reassignments, current book on reserve, and possibly a few other tweaks. More would obviously be better, but I highly doubt that the majority would vote to take over a year to start over. If TA2 has the changes that I listed, it wouldn’t be a landslide, but it would easily pass. I just hope it has a me too clause because once the training department is staffed, the company has little reason to return to the table.
Wadr what you describe is a 50+1 extension. A pay raise, a few tweaks, and current book on everything else. Once again we trash our leverage giving the company the relief it desires wrt the training pipeline.

It’s been 10 years since we’ve had a full contract. That wasn’t even a true contract considering all the opposing forces involved. During that time lived under contract extensions and LOAs frittering away leverage at each point. This is the reason our entire contract is so lacking.

You argue yet another extension with a me too clause because the company has no reason to come back to the table. That tells me you realize what we are signing is inadequate and hope another pilot will accomplish what we’re unwilling to do.

If we continue with this madness of extensions and LOAs, in the end we’ll essentially be working for hourly rates under a contract so woefully inadequate that we’ll never catch up. This career will forever be harmed. I for one am willing to wait as long as it takes.

PS…time to shelve Interest Based Bargaining. That will only lead to slightly cost plus agreements under a variable cost structure that the company so desires.
Reply
Old 09-08-2022 | 04:59 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,662
Likes: 125
Default

Originally Posted by TodKindrsChikun
Wadr what you describe is a 50+1 extension. A pay raise, a few tweaks, and current book on everything else. Once again we trash our leverage giving the company the relief it desires wrt the training pipeline.

It’s been 10 years since we’ve had a full contract. That wasn’t even a true contract considering all the opposing forces involved. During that time lived under contract extensions and LOAs frittering away leverage at each point. This is the reason our entire contract is so lacking.

You argue yet another extension with a me too clause because the company has no reason to come back to the table. That tells me you realize what we are signing is inadequate and hope another pilot will accomplish what we’re unwilling to do.

If we continue with this madness of extensions and LOAs, in the end we’ll essentially be working for hourly rates under a contract so woefully inadequate that we’ll never catch up. This career will forever be harmed. I for one am willing to wait as long as it takes.

PS…time to shelve Interest Based Bargaining. That will only lead to slightly cost plus agreements under a variable cost structure that the company so desires.
I’m definitely not arguing for it, but I think that is what we’ll see. I also don’t think it will be 50+1, more like 65-70% pass. Our reps represent the masses and not the small echo chamber here on APC. I suspect that the polling will show different results than what people argue here. On APC for example, nothing less than a complete rewrite of reserve rules are in order, but on the line I doubt that is where the majority want the emphasis. TA1 wasn’t a extension or LOA, it was in fact a new contract. It was a horrible deal full of concessions with a little add pay sprinkled around, but it was a new negotiated contract. There were also small gains in things like training pay, but those few gains were obviously grossly overshadowed by the gives. It’s not what I want, but I think that a 15+5+5 deal and removing the concessions from TA1 would in fact easily pass. A NB captain rate of $358 would be too hard for the majority to vote down.
Reply
Old 09-08-2022 | 05:18 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 34
Default

The estimate for the Social Security COLA increase for 2022 is 9.6% ....it will be announced in Oct. That is on top of 5.9% for 2021. and another 1.3% for 2020, and 1.6% for 2019. So, the .gov has seen fit to increase SS by 18.5 % cumulative over the course of your open contract and you think 15% is gonna cut it?

You truly think sub inflation pay increases will garner 50%+1? I hope you are incorrect.
Reply
Old 09-08-2022 | 05:32 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,662
Likes: 125
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
The estimate for the Social Security COLA increase for 2022 is 9.6% ....it will be announced in Oct. That is on top of 5.9% for 2021. and another 1.3% for 2020, and 1.6% for 2019. So, the .gov has seen fit to increase SS by 18.5 % cumulative over the course of your open contract and you think 15% is gonna cut it?

You truly think sub inflation pay increases will garner 50%+1? I hope you are incorrect.
I sincerely hope that I’m wrong too, but my concern is pilot logic. Math is hard, emotions are easy. I’m afraid that a chart showing 15+5+5 would make enough pilots smile that they’d overlook inflation and the concept of holding out for a much better deal. People like to talk a big game, but they’re also extremely impatient. I’m convinced that 15+5+5 and removing the concessions from TA1 would pass by 2/3 or more. People are tired of waiting and will take the bird in the hand. We’ll know soon enough. The poll closes this week. I’d expect to see expedited negotiations and TA2 rolled out soon after that.
Reply
Old 09-08-2022 | 05:35 AM
  #50  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
The estimate for the Social Security COLA increase for 2022 is 9.6% ....it will be announced in Oct. That is on top of 5.9% for 2021. and another 1.3% for 2020, and 1.6% for 2019. So, the .gov has seen fit to increase SS by 18.5 % cumulative over the course of your open contract and you think 15% is gonna cut it?

You truly think sub inflation pay increases will garner 50%+1? I hope you are incorrect.
….and those increases will bankrupt the SSA even faster than currently projected and further increase inflation.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
InformationEcho
American
75
01-30-2015 10:50 AM
gettinbumped
United
0
12-11-2012 11:29 AM
Flyguppy
United
228
10-26-2012 03:23 PM
Regularguy
United
80
03-12-2012 04:46 PM
AAflyer
Major
42
05-13-2007 05:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices