UAL: Pay Raise Percent
#51
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,235
Likes: 81
Haven't you heard, there's new science in monetary policy....debt doesn't matter, printing more money doesn't matter. Free everything for everyone......let the grandkids figure it out.
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 34
I have a feeling those advocating for sub inflation pay rates are close to retirement. This strategy doesn't work for those with decades to go. Not to mention, one entity is an ongoing business who just passes on the inflation by way of increased ticket prices.
I still contend, to expect less than inflation is a fools errand. Pilots my be susceptible to being hoodwinked but not after the Tumi TA fiasco.
JMHO
I still contend, to expect less than inflation is a fools errand. Pilots my be susceptible to being hoodwinked but not after the Tumi TA fiasco.
JMHO
#53
On Reserve
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Here’s an accurate pay comparison: At PSA, 1st year FOs make $60/hour. First year Captains make $97.50/hour. I’m a 4th year Captain at PSA making $107.50/hour (just $16 more than 1st year AA FO). These are the new rates, too. Not quite as rosy as most have painted on these forums. It is true that we are getting a 50% Premium until August ‘24. That’s how 1st year FOs are making $90/hour and I’m making $161/hour (3rd year AA FO pay). These temporary inflated wages aren’t in place because that’s what the company thinks we’re worth, or what they think we deserve. These temporary inflated wages are in place to keep us from running for the exits, to keep us from bailing to any of the other non-regional airlines that are on an unprecedented hiring binge. These rates are temporary and unsustainably high. To base your own pay increases on these regional rates seems unrealistic.
Someone mentioned 5th year+ captains making $215/hour and LCAs making $430/hour. This is true, but with one very important distinction. These rates only apply to those pilots who want to flow to American, but have not yet been selected to flow. In other words, the pilots who are making these amazing wages actually want to leave the company that is paying them these amazing wages. Someone mentioned these LCAs making more than widebody captains. How many widebody Captains out there making $350+/hour want to leave their company? The reality is those regional LCAs you point out that are making more than widebody Captains actually want to become narrow body FOs making $90/hour. And that’s something that seems to be lost in all these comparisons. Yeah, the money is good at the regionals right now, but we’d much rather be in the right seat of a legacy airplane despite the pay. And the pay won’t last. Come August ‘24 if I decide not to flow my pay as a 7th year captain goes back to $117.50/hour. That’s 7th year. How much do your 2nd year FOs make?
You say even with a 20% raise junior legacy captains ($250*20=$300/hour) would make less than regional captains (at best $215/hour at premium pay)? In your words that’s flawed thinking. I mean, I suppose you could if you spent your free time in FLICA strategizing and hustling to drop, swap and pick up premium and fly 90 hours to credit 120, while the legacy pilot spends their free time at the golf course, couldn’t care less about FLICA and credits 75. So you’re comparing apples to oranges. But if you’re a hustling type of pilot at the regionals, that’s probably the type of pilot you’ll be at the legacies…but making $100 more an hour. And again remember that $215/hour captain would rather be at the legacy no matter the pay cut. If not, they’re only gonna make $120/hour, give or take, and at that wage no amount of premium opentime hustling will get them anywhere near that junior legacy captain pay (even without the 20% pay raise you proposed).
#54
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
I have a feeling those advocating for sub inflation pay rates are close to retirement. This strategy doesn't work for those with decades to go. Not to mention, one entity is an ongoing business who just passes on the inflation by way of increased ticket prices.
I still contend, to expect less than inflation is a fools errand. Pilots my be susceptible to being hoodwinked but not after the Tumi TA fiasco.
JMHO
I still contend, to expect less than inflation is a fools errand. Pilots my be susceptible to being hoodwinked but not after the Tumi TA fiasco.
JMHO
#55
I’m not negotiating for everyone. I’m negotiating among a group of about 14,000 airline pilots. Our impact on the national rate of inflation will be nominal at best, and is nowhere near my primary concern. And yes, I do expect our wages to exceed inflation on DOS.
#56
On Reserve
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 108
Likes: 8
I sincerely hope that I’m wrong too, but my concern is pilot logic. Math is hard, emotions are easy. I’m afraid that a chart showing 15+5+5 would make enough pilots smile that they’d overlook inflation and the concept of holding out for a much better deal. People like to talk a big game, but they’re also extremely impatient. I’m convinced that 15+5+5 and removing the concessions from TA1 would pass by 2/3 or more. People are tired of waiting and will take the bird in the hand. We’ll know soon enough. The poll closes this week. I’d expect to see expedited negotiations and TA2 rolled out soon after that.
#58
Banned
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
I’m definitely not arguing for it, but I think that is what we’ll see. I also don’t think it will be 50+1, more like 65-70% pass. Our reps represent the masses and not the small echo chamber here on APC. I suspect that the polling will show different results than what people argue here. On APC for example, nothing less than a complete rewrite of reserve rules are in order, but on the line I doubt that is where the majority want the emphasis. TA1 wasn’t a extension or LOA, it was in fact a new contract. It was a horrible deal full of concessions with a little add pay sprinkled around, but it was a new negotiated contract. There were also small gains in things like training pay, but those few gains were obviously grossly overshadowed by the gives. It’s not what I want, but I think that a 15+5+5 deal and removing the concessions from TA1 would in fact easily pass. A NB captain rate of $358 would be too hard for the majority to vote down.
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Brethren, 40% is a baseline that merely almost restores contract 2000 pay. Considering the current shortage, the sky is the limit of course but to keep things based in reality we can look to the regionals. The raise should be nothing short of 40% to 70% over the next three years. Something like 40% straight away plus 10% plus 10% would satisfactorily cover section 3 for 36 months.
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 116
We’ll know where we stand pretty soon. If the polling data and emails to our representatives show that the majority want shiny new rates and window dressings, then that’s what they’ll negotiate. If the data shows that we’re willing to wait for a potentially superior deal, then that’s the path we follow. My money is on the majority agreeing that TA1 was a joke, but they’d rather have shiny rates and fringe than to wait for recalls, a new negotiating committee, and the time it would take to start over. My bet is still that we get TA1 without the concessions and new rates. A comfortable majority of the pilot group will have something that they’d vote for and Kirby gets his training department fully staffed for the expansion.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



