MAY System Bid
04-26-2011, 09:06 PM
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: IAH 737 CA
Posts: 690
MAY System Bid
Keep hearing the rumblings of a MAY system bid for CAL with 200 + vacancies on it. The reason is that the 787 will be on property 
by May of next year. This bid is supposed to allow for the staffing of the 787 they cancelled on the last bid. Anyone else hear this or care to chime in? I'm sure it on the crack-pipe but I just can't give MB my money anymore for the repeated drivel over there to go and check.
by May of next year. This bid is supposed to allow for the staffing of the 787 they cancelled on the last bid. Anyone else hear this or care to chime in? I'm sure it on the crack-pipe but I just can't give MB my money anymore for the repeated drivel over there to go and check.
04-27-2011, 06:53 AM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 520
They can have all the vacancies they want. Doesnt mean they will fill them.
Cal will operate short thru this summer and reduce schedule along with ual after labor day. So, the abovemight have vacancies, but 0 and i mean 0 furlough recalls this year by ual or cal
Cal will operate short thru this summer and reduce schedule along with ual after labor day. So, the abovemight have vacancies, but 0 and i mean 0 furlough recalls this year by ual or cal
04-27-2011, 11:55 AM
#4
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 16
Not that he is in the know, but I just flew with a houston assistant chief. He said bid in May to staff 787. He said we are short for the summer but will be overstaffed by a couple hundred this fall with the cutbacks. We'll see....
04-27-2011, 02:23 PM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Capt. B737
Posts: 329
He said we are short for the summer but will be overstaffed by a couple hundred this fall with the cutbacks.
04-27-2011, 03:13 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Originally Posted by Daytripper
I suspect my definition of "overstaffed" varies greatly from how the company defines it. Until that particular pendulum swings more toward me being able to trip trade without the infamous "min staffing" message, or PBS behaving more in a user friendly fashion......it's a no vote.
Makes you wonder.
04-27-2011, 04:55 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
Interesting, we are being told that United is trimming the schedule due to high fuel costs. For some fleets and seats, if you are sitting 50% or less, you are being forced into a 70 hour line. Some of these folks are wondering how they are going to pay the mortgage. The CAL side however, appears to continue line construction at or near max hours with very little schedule reduction.
Makes you wonder.
Makes you wonder.
04-27-2011, 05:15 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Originally Posted by Andy
70 hrs/mo for the junior FO in the Airbus is a bit more than $75K/yr. Some can't make ends meet on $75K/yr???
04-27-2011, 05:23 PM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
Interesting, we are being told that United is trimming the schedule due to high fuel costs. For some fleets and seats, if you are sitting 50% or less, you are being forced into a 70 hour line. Some of these folks are wondering how they are going to pay the mortgage. The CAL side however, appears to continue line construction at or near max hours with very little schedule reduction.
Makes you wonder.
Makes you wonder.
04-27-2011, 05:27 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Originally Posted by Ottopilot
Really? I'm no where near any max hours on the 737. The only way to get more than 80 hours is from EWR delays. My line values are around 77 hours.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
