Notices

MAY System Bid

Old 04-26-2011 | 09:06 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Default MAY System Bid

Keep hearing the rumblings of a MAY system bid for CAL with 200 + vacancies on it. The reason is that the 787 will be on property by May of next year. This bid is supposed to allow for the staffing of the 787 they cancelled on the last bid. Anyone else hear this or care to chime in? I'm sure it on the crack-pipe but I just can't give MB my money anymore for the repeated drivel over there to go and check.
Reply
Old 04-26-2011 | 10:33 PM
  #2  
Ottopilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,576
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

How many vacancies on the last 787 bid (the one they cancelled)? Not many. I wouldn't expect any bid or any vacancies. We just had one.
Reply
Old 04-27-2011 | 06:53 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Default

They can have all the vacancies they want. Doesnt mean they will fill them.
Cal will operate short thru this summer and reduce schedule along with ual after labor day. So, the abovemight have vacancies, but 0 and i mean 0 furlough recalls this year by ual or cal
Reply
Old 04-27-2011 | 11:55 AM
  #4  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

Not that he is in the know, but I just flew with a houston assistant chief. He said bid in May to staff 787. He said we are short for the summer but will be overstaffed by a couple hundred this fall with the cutbacks. We'll see....
Reply
Old 04-27-2011 | 02:23 PM
  #5  
Daytripper's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Capt. B737
Default

He said we are short for the summer but will be overstaffed by a couple hundred this fall with the cutbacks.
I suspect my definition of "overstaffed" varies greatly from how the company defines it. Until that particular pendulum swings more toward me being able to trip trade without the infamous "min staffing" message, or PBS behaving more in a user friendly fashion......it's a no vote.
Reply
Old 04-27-2011 | 03:13 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Daytripper
I suspect my definition of "overstaffed" varies greatly from how the company defines it. Until that particular pendulum swings more toward me being able to trip trade without the infamous "min staffing" message, or PBS behaving more in a user friendly fashion......it's a no vote.
Interesting, we are being told that United is trimming the schedule due to high fuel costs. For some fleets and seats, if you are sitting 50% or less, you are being forced into a 70 hour line. Some of these folks are wondering how they are going to pay the mortgage. The CAL side however, appears to continue line construction at or near max hours with very little schedule reduction.

Makes you wonder.
Reply
Old 04-27-2011 | 04:55 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
Interesting, we are being told that United is trimming the schedule due to high fuel costs. For some fleets and seats, if you are sitting 50% or less, you are being forced into a 70 hour line. Some of these folks are wondering how they are going to pay the mortgage. The CAL side however, appears to continue line construction at or near max hours with very little schedule reduction.

Makes you wonder.
70 hrs/mo for the junior FO in the Airbus is a bit more than $75K/yr. Some can't make ends meet on $75K/yr???
Reply
Old 04-27-2011 | 05:15 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
70 hrs/mo for the junior FO in the Airbus is a bit more than $75K/yr. Some can't make ends meet on $75K/yr???
I know it's not easy being furloughed and $75k would be a huge help to many. Trust me, I'm sick of the bleeding on the part of our pilot group. The main point of my post is that it appears we are bearing a disproportionate brunt of the cutbacks. I don't think they are done with us yet.
Reply
Old 04-27-2011 | 05:23 PM
  #9  
Ottopilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,576
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
Interesting, we are being told that United is trimming the schedule due to high fuel costs. For some fleets and seats, if you are sitting 50% or less, you are being forced into a 70 hour line. Some of these folks are wondering how they are going to pay the mortgage. The CAL side however, appears to continue line construction at or near max hours with very little schedule reduction.

Makes you wonder.
Really? I'm no where near any max hours on the 737. The only way to get more than 80 hours is from EWR delays. My line values are around 77 hours.
Reply
Old 04-27-2011 | 05:27 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
Really? I'm no where near any max hours on the 737. The only way to get more than 80 hours is from EWR delays. My line values are around 77 hours.
Then why are you guys always talking about being flown to death?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
170
02-11-2011 11:10 AM
Roberto
Cargo
147
06-09-2008 04:31 PM
HerkDriver
Cargo
5
09-18-2007 01:56 PM
Coffee Bitch
Cargo
115
05-23-2007 08:02 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
17
08-20-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices