Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Where are the "official" acceptance numbers? >

Where are the "official" acceptance numbers?

Search
Notices

Where are the "official" acceptance numbers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2011, 10:33 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: Bench Warmer-Put me in coach!
Posts: 39
Default

Originally Posted by flyingfarmer View Post
No official numbers; however, talked Christi in IAH recently. She said a total of 350 total letters sent out. She is expecting, based on conversations with United counterpart, to get 50% military deferrals. Finally, most interesting thing said was in response to my belief of going about half way thru the list to get the 177+-... She said, no she believed that they would go all the way thru the list.

Also, said bid late Dec. or early Jan. with training til summer ... then ramping back up in the fall. I told her I sure hope she is right!
Thanks for the update. When you say bid early Dec or Jan, are you talking about another vacancy bid at CAL? Would this preclude more job offers? Sorry if it seems like a basic question, but I am trying to understand as I go along.

FMT
Fool Me Twice is offline  
Old 09-14-2011, 10:45 AM
  #22  
(retired)
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
Posts: 422
Default

Originally Posted by Fool Me Twice View Post
Thanks for the update. When you say bid early Dec or Jan, are you talking about another vacancy bid at CAL? Would this preclude more job offers? Sorry if it seems like a basic question, but I am trying to understand as I go along.

FMT
We have what's known as a system bid aproximately every six months that looks out for 12 months. The DEC/JAN system bid will look out 12 months towards the end of 2012/early 2013 which should start to account for age 65 retirements starting to kick in.
Old UCAL CA is offline  
Old 09-14-2011, 12:51 PM
  #23  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA View Post
We have what's known as a system bid aproximately every six months that looks out for 12 months. The DEC/JAN system bid will look out 12 months towards the end of 2012/early 2013 which should start to account for age 65 retirements starting to kick in.
To add to the above....

CAL's present CBA dictates that there will be ("contractually", not that this means too much these days w/ our current Mgt) TWO system/equipment bids every year. "Historically" they happen in the 'early' and 'mid' point of each calendar year, but can happen at other times within the calendar year. This is not to say that there can't be more than 2 bids annually if something dictates....IE further expansion, or a 'reduction bid', which could lead in the direction that no one wants...
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 09-14-2011, 01:30 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Aeronca Champ
Posts: 120
Default

Originally Posted by beeker View Post
Could be more vacancies, could be furloughs. We will have to wait and see.
She indicated that the bid will start to account for retirements. However, she also said there are rumors about possibly parking the 500's; but that rumor has been around for some time ... At least from my former COEX days in the early post 9/11 days. She indicated continued hiring and training for the foreseeable future due to pipeline constraints .
flyingfarmer is offline  
Old 09-14-2011, 01:51 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 400
Default Communication from United Furlough

By now many may have gotten the email from the United furlough rep stating info about Guam and junior/senior information, however unfortunately there wasn't any concrete bypass numbers.

We have heard several times lately that the BOTH October classes were filled by the first 100 calls with the Guam slots by 123 down the list.

The email today changes that to only one class filled (Otober 4th) and the junior Guam taker at 158.

So to recap and get a grip on things, how many were in the October 4th class, how many are in the later October class and if so do we still know how many calls they had to make to fill that first class? Trying to figure a bypass ratio. Filling two classes in 100 calls is one thing, but only having filled one class (12 or 16 seats right?) so far and accelerating the letter sending to 250 per shot rather than 100 could indicate the bypass and acceptance ratio is considerably higher than many have been speculating.

Add to that the reports here that Continetal folks are saying the whole list may gone through to get the 178 or more, suggests a ratio of closer to 8 to 1 and that a 50% bypass percentage is already being generated by military defers.

Still hard to believe this might be the case but can everybody jump in here and either correct my numbers or refute the possibility that info is emerging that is suggesting the bypass ratio may be much higher than the 3 or 4 to 1?

Maybe I am looking at the data wrong. Thanks. DV
dvhighdrive88 is offline  
Old 09-14-2011, 02:58 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,165
Default

Originally Posted by dvhighdrive88 View Post
Add to that the reports here that Continetal folks are saying the whole list may gone through to get the 178 or more, suggests a ratio of closer to 8 to 1 and that a 50% bypass percentage is already being generated by military defers.

Still hard to believe this might be the case but can everybody jump in here and either correct my numbers or refute the possibility that info is emerging that is suggesting the bypass ratio may be much higher than the 3 or 4 to 1?

Maybe I am looking at the data wrong. Thanks. DV
Thanks for the notice on the e-mail. I liked Ted's comment about the active pilots getting Continental job offers.

First, don't assume that the number 99 accepting a domestic domicile is going into the first Oct class. I don't read the e-mail that way; I read it that they sent out two batches of letters - one for Guam only and another for domestic domiciles for any non-Guamer (not a word but hopefully conveys my intent). The letter seeking Guamers went to a lot more than 100 furloughees. The letter going out for domestic domiciles only went to 100 furloughees. So number 99 accepting a domestic domicile may be assigned to the second class. Does this make sense?
Going forward, they will send out letters in batches of 250 starting next week. So a total of 350 will receive offers for domestic domiciles, with plans to fill Nov and Dec classes.

Second, I don't see the military deferral number remaining that high for reasons I've already posted.

Third, many deferrals may accept later classes due to: 1) having current job committments or 2) want to get some bodies beneath them before accepting recall.

I'm not trying to be too negative but I also don't want to get peoples' hopes up on when they'll see a recall. I'm probably going to barely miss the second batch of 250 letters but I will be near the top of the following set of 250 letters. At this point, I think it's a bit too early to calculate recall percentages. I can see reasons for both high and low bypass rates.
The good news that I read in all of this is that it sounds like they'll keep a training pipeline flowing after the 178 slots. I'll feel a lot better when I see that Continental is accepting newhire applications ... I don't expect to see any recalls on the United side for a while. Once United recalls happen, it'll be a cluster and the company had better be willing to throw us double furloughees a bone to not royally screw up their training cycles.
Andy is offline  
Old 09-14-2011, 04:16 PM
  #27  
Fore!
 
Tony Nelson's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 756 F/O
Posts: 505
Default

Originally Posted by Andy View Post

I'm not trying to be too negative but I also don't want to get peoples' hopes up on when they'll see a recall. I'm probably going to barely miss the second batch of 250 letters but I will be near the top of the following set of 250 letters. At this point, I think it's a bit too early to calculate recall percentages. I can see reasons for both high and low bypass rates.
The good news that I read in all of this is that it sounds like they'll keep a training pipeline flowing after the 178 slots. I'll feel a lot better when I see that Continental is accepting newhire applications ... I don't expect to see any recalls on the United side for a while. Once United recalls happen, it'll be a cluster and the company had better be willing to throw us double furloughees a bone to not royally screw up their training cycles.
I'm still waiting for a recall to start.
Tony Nelson is offline  
Old 09-14-2011, 04:25 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 400
Default

We still don't know how many they called to fill the first class. What does it matter really in the long run anyway. Will be what it be.
dvhighdrive88 is offline  
Old 09-15-2011, 03:57 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Aeronca Champ
Posts: 120
Default

Originally Posted by dvhighdrive88 View Post
By now many may have gotten the email from the United furlough rep stating info about Guam and junior/senior information, however unfortunately there wasn't any concrete bypass numbers.

We have heard several times lately that the BOTH October classes were filled by the first 100 calls with the Guam slots by 123 down the list.

The email today changes that to only one class filled (Otober 4th) and the junior Guam taker at 158.

So to recap and get a grip on things, how many were in the October 4th class, how many are in the later October class and if so do we still know how many calls they had to make to fill that first class? Trying to figure a bypass ratio. Filling two classes in 100 calls is one thing, but only having filled one class (12 or 16 seats right?) so far and accelerating the letter sending to 250 per shot rather than 100 could indicate the bypass and acceptance ratio is considerably higher than many have been speculating.

Add to that the reports here that Continetal folks are saying the whole list may gone through to get the 178 or more, suggests a ratio of closer to 8 to 1 and that a 50% bypass percentage is already being generated by military defers.

Still hard to believe this might be the case but can everybody jump in here and either correct my numbers or refute the possibility that info is emerging that is suggesting the bypass ratio may be much higher than the 3 or 4 to 1?

Maybe I am looking at the data wrong. Thanks. DV
I have received no email... Normally, I get all MEC, Council 11, and ALPA blastmail. Would someone please post the email or pm me the email.

Thanks
flyingfarmer is offline  
Old 09-15-2011, 06:01 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FurloughedX2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Line Pilot
Posts: 142
Default

I wanted to go to the local MEC Chairman Road Show today, but couldn't make it. I wanted to ask Wendy if they are trying to get us furloughed guys longevity credit for the furlough time!

On another note, I only get ALPA and LEC emails. Haven't received anything regarding the CAL job opportunity either.....
FurloughedX2 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
themotleyfool
Major
21
04-29-2012 03:58 PM
jungle
Money Talk
13
01-19-2009 06:06 PM
Dracma
Cargo
11
01-16-2009 06:12 AM
jungle
Cargo
0
12-30-2008 10:22 AM
OOTSK
Cargo
9
12-29-2008 05:53 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices