Where are the "official" acceptance numbers?
#21
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: Bench Warmer-Put me in coach!
Posts: 39
No official numbers; however, talked Christi in IAH recently. She said a total of 350 total letters sent out. She is expecting, based on conversations with United counterpart, to get 50% military deferrals. Finally, most interesting thing said was in response to my belief of going about half way thru the list to get the 177+-... She said, no she believed that they would go all the way thru the list.
Also, said bid late Dec. or early Jan. with training til summer ... then ramping back up in the fall. I told her I sure hope she is right!
Also, said bid late Dec. or early Jan. with training til summer ... then ramping back up in the fall. I told her I sure hope she is right!
FMT
#22
(retired)
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
Posts: 422
We have what's known as a system bid aproximately every six months that looks out for 12 months. The DEC/JAN system bid will look out 12 months towards the end of 2012/early 2013 which should start to account for age 65 retirements starting to kick in.
#23
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
CAL's present CBA dictates that there will be ("contractually", not that this means too much these days w/ our current Mgt) TWO system/equipment bids every year. "Historically" they happen in the 'early' and 'mid' point of each calendar year, but can happen at other times within the calendar year. This is not to say that there can't be more than 2 bids annually if something dictates....IE further expansion, or a 'reduction bid', which could lead in the direction that no one wants...
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Aeronca Champ
Posts: 120
She indicated that the bid will start to account for retirements. However, she also said there are rumors about possibly parking the 500's; but that rumor has been around for some time ... At least from my former COEX days in the early post 9/11 days. She indicated continued hiring and training for the foreseeable future due to pipeline constraints .
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 400
Communication from United Furlough
By now many may have gotten the email from the United furlough rep stating info about Guam and junior/senior information, however unfortunately there wasn't any concrete bypass numbers.
We have heard several times lately that the BOTH October classes were filled by the first 100 calls with the Guam slots by 123 down the list.
The email today changes that to only one class filled (Otober 4th) and the junior Guam taker at 158.
So to recap and get a grip on things, how many were in the October 4th class, how many are in the later October class and if so do we still know how many calls they had to make to fill that first class? Trying to figure a bypass ratio. Filling two classes in 100 calls is one thing, but only having filled one class (12 or 16 seats right?) so far and accelerating the letter sending to 250 per shot rather than 100 could indicate the bypass and acceptance ratio is considerably higher than many have been speculating.
Add to that the reports here that Continetal folks are saying the whole list may gone through to get the 178 or more, suggests a ratio of closer to 8 to 1 and that a 50% bypass percentage is already being generated by military defers.
Still hard to believe this might be the case but can everybody jump in here and either correct my numbers or refute the possibility that info is emerging that is suggesting the bypass ratio may be much higher than the 3 or 4 to 1?
Maybe I am looking at the data wrong. Thanks. DV
We have heard several times lately that the BOTH October classes were filled by the first 100 calls with the Guam slots by 123 down the list.
The email today changes that to only one class filled (Otober 4th) and the junior Guam taker at 158.
So to recap and get a grip on things, how many were in the October 4th class, how many are in the later October class and if so do we still know how many calls they had to make to fill that first class? Trying to figure a bypass ratio. Filling two classes in 100 calls is one thing, but only having filled one class (12 or 16 seats right?) so far and accelerating the letter sending to 250 per shot rather than 100 could indicate the bypass and acceptance ratio is considerably higher than many have been speculating.
Add to that the reports here that Continetal folks are saying the whole list may gone through to get the 178 or more, suggests a ratio of closer to 8 to 1 and that a 50% bypass percentage is already being generated by military defers.
Still hard to believe this might be the case but can everybody jump in here and either correct my numbers or refute the possibility that info is emerging that is suggesting the bypass ratio may be much higher than the 3 or 4 to 1?
Maybe I am looking at the data wrong. Thanks. DV
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,165
Add to that the reports here that Continetal folks are saying the whole list may gone through to get the 178 or more, suggests a ratio of closer to 8 to 1 and that a 50% bypass percentage is already being generated by military defers.
Still hard to believe this might be the case but can everybody jump in here and either correct my numbers or refute the possibility that info is emerging that is suggesting the bypass ratio may be much higher than the 3 or 4 to 1?
Maybe I am looking at the data wrong. Thanks. DV
Still hard to believe this might be the case but can everybody jump in here and either correct my numbers or refute the possibility that info is emerging that is suggesting the bypass ratio may be much higher than the 3 or 4 to 1?
Maybe I am looking at the data wrong. Thanks. DV
First, don't assume that the number 99 accepting a domestic domicile is going into the first Oct class. I don't read the e-mail that way; I read it that they sent out two batches of letters - one for Guam only and another for domestic domiciles for any non-Guamer (not a word but hopefully conveys my intent). The letter seeking Guamers went to a lot more than 100 furloughees. The letter going out for domestic domiciles only went to 100 furloughees. So number 99 accepting a domestic domicile may be assigned to the second class. Does this make sense?
Going forward, they will send out letters in batches of 250 starting next week. So a total of 350 will receive offers for domestic domiciles, with plans to fill Nov and Dec classes.
Second, I don't see the military deferral number remaining that high for reasons I've already posted.
Third, many deferrals may accept later classes due to: 1) having current job committments or 2) want to get some bodies beneath them before accepting recall.
I'm not trying to be too negative but I also don't want to get peoples' hopes up on when they'll see a recall. I'm probably going to barely miss the second batch of 250 letters but I will be near the top of the following set of 250 letters. At this point, I think it's a bit too early to calculate recall percentages. I can see reasons for both high and low bypass rates.
The good news that I read in all of this is that it sounds like they'll keep a training pipeline flowing after the 178 slots. I'll feel a lot better when I see that Continental is accepting newhire applications ... I don't expect to see any recalls on the United side for a while. Once United recalls happen, it'll be a cluster and the company had better be willing to throw us double furloughees a bone to not royally screw up their training cycles.
#27
I'm not trying to be too negative but I also don't want to get peoples' hopes up on when they'll see a recall. I'm probably going to barely miss the second batch of 250 letters but I will be near the top of the following set of 250 letters. At this point, I think it's a bit too early to calculate recall percentages. I can see reasons for both high and low bypass rates.
The good news that I read in all of this is that it sounds like they'll keep a training pipeline flowing after the 178 slots. I'll feel a lot better when I see that Continental is accepting newhire applications ... I don't expect to see any recalls on the United side for a while. Once United recalls happen, it'll be a cluster and the company had better be willing to throw us double furloughees a bone to not royally screw up their training cycles.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Aeronca Champ
Posts: 120
By now many may have gotten the email from the United furlough rep stating info about Guam and junior/senior information, however unfortunately there wasn't any concrete bypass numbers.
We have heard several times lately that the BOTH October classes were filled by the first 100 calls with the Guam slots by 123 down the list.
The email today changes that to only one class filled (Otober 4th) and the junior Guam taker at 158.
So to recap and get a grip on things, how many were in the October 4th class, how many are in the later October class and if so do we still know how many calls they had to make to fill that first class? Trying to figure a bypass ratio. Filling two classes in 100 calls is one thing, but only having filled one class (12 or 16 seats right?) so far and accelerating the letter sending to 250 per shot rather than 100 could indicate the bypass and acceptance ratio is considerably higher than many have been speculating.
Add to that the reports here that Continetal folks are saying the whole list may gone through to get the 178 or more, suggests a ratio of closer to 8 to 1 and that a 50% bypass percentage is already being generated by military defers.
Still hard to believe this might be the case but can everybody jump in here and either correct my numbers or refute the possibility that info is emerging that is suggesting the bypass ratio may be much higher than the 3 or 4 to 1?
Maybe I am looking at the data wrong. Thanks. DV
We have heard several times lately that the BOTH October classes were filled by the first 100 calls with the Guam slots by 123 down the list.
The email today changes that to only one class filled (Otober 4th) and the junior Guam taker at 158.
So to recap and get a grip on things, how many were in the October 4th class, how many are in the later October class and if so do we still know how many calls they had to make to fill that first class? Trying to figure a bypass ratio. Filling two classes in 100 calls is one thing, but only having filled one class (12 or 16 seats right?) so far and accelerating the letter sending to 250 per shot rather than 100 could indicate the bypass and acceptance ratio is considerably higher than many have been speculating.
Add to that the reports here that Continetal folks are saying the whole list may gone through to get the 178 or more, suggests a ratio of closer to 8 to 1 and that a 50% bypass percentage is already being generated by military defers.
Still hard to believe this might be the case but can everybody jump in here and either correct my numbers or refute the possibility that info is emerging that is suggesting the bypass ratio may be much higher than the 3 or 4 to 1?
Maybe I am looking at the data wrong. Thanks. DV
Thanks
#30
I wanted to go to the local MEC Chairman Road Show today, but couldn't make it. I wanted to ask Wendy if they are trying to get us furloughed guys longevity credit for the furlough time!
On another note, I only get ALPA and LEC emails. Haven't received anything regarding the CAL job opportunity either.....
On another note, I only get ALPA and LEC emails. Haven't received anything regarding the CAL job opportunity either.....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post