Search

Notices

System Bid Out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2012 | 06:09 PM
  #261  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
Default

Short...

The ALPA rules are the integration can not change a pilot's position relative to others on his/her original seniority list. Which means you will never be senior to those who were senior to you at LUAL but passed up work at LCAL.

Now one could ask the question, "what if the ISL process took longer and my LCAL position would be greater after the arbitrated ISL than my LUAL position would be?" Strangers things could happen, but I doubt that will ever be a player in this ISL.

The longer this goes the more complicated the ISL will be.
Reply
Old 09-18-2012 | 06:43 PM
  #262  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
No. I personally don't expect them to be stapled. But, considering they're currently on involuntary furlough(no recall offered) I would expect that they will have people hired at CAL after they were hired at UAL to end up senior to them. IOW, they're 99 hire date will likely not put them senior to 2004(05) hires at CAL.

But that's just my opinion. And that's worth nothing to most people.
Let's see, been furloughed for years, and at time of snap shot were UNEMPLOYED, now you want them to come back and hold captain. Sweet, sounds like a windfall!
Reply
Old 09-18-2012 | 07:11 PM
  #263  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: 2172/1437
Default

Originally Posted by thor2j
Let's see, been furloughed for years, and at time of snap shot were UNEMPLOYED, now you want them to come back and hold captain. Sweet, sounds like a windfall!
Where did he say that? Sounds to me like he is advocating a compromise.

What would you like to see happen?
Reply
Old 09-18-2012 | 08:52 PM
  #264  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default

If there was no merger where would these involuntary furloughs be when recalled at United? What equipment would they hold? Captain? 777 FO?

2005 Continental hires can hold captain, can hold 777 FO line holder, hold any equipment out there. They are at about 72 percent on the relative seniority list. So an involuntary furloughed pilot will just slide right in? Bang you are now able to hold captain, and this is justified because you were hired in 1999??

I am sorry your career has not progressed as expected, but this doesn't seem fair.
Reply
Old 09-18-2012 | 09:19 PM
  #265  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: Le Bus
Default

Originally Posted by routemap
If there was no merger where would these involuntary furloughs be when recalled at United? What equipment would they hold? Captain? 777 FO?

2005 Continental hires can hold captain, can hold 777 FO line holder, hold any equipment out there. They are at about 72 percent on the relative seniority list. So an involuntary furloughed pilot will just slide right in? Bang you are now able to hold captain, and this is justified because you were hired in 1999??

I am sorry your career has not progressed as expected, but this doesn't seem fair.

And you should have an extra 1500 pilots below you on the merged list? Is that fair?
Reply
Old 09-19-2012 | 03:10 AM
  #266  
(retired)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
Default

Read it again gentlemen (loose term). Two have said it.

A pilot/s cannot be re-ordered relative to one's own list during the procedure.
Reply
Old 09-19-2012 | 05:50 AM
  #267  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 308
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by SOTeric
And you should have an extra 1500 pilots below you on the merged list? Is that fair?
Actually, the bottom guy on the pre-merger L-CAL list should now have about 2000 guys below him, even before the SLI ... the 500 or so that have been hired by S-CAL since the merger, and the 1500 or so that we're not hired by L-CAL because L-CAL " right-sized" for the merger by not buying more 777s/767s pre-merger ... And since we are going to account for the not on property L-UAL pilots in the SLI, then we should account for these not on property pilots also.
Reply
Old 09-19-2012 | 06:30 AM
  #268  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by thor2j
Let's see, been furloughed for years, and at time of snap shot were UNEMPLOYED, now you want them to come back and hold captain. Sweet, sounds like a windfall!
Look, I have no dog in the fight. Mmmmmmkay? I'm DAL, and was pre merger NWA. My only real point for the UAL/CAL guys is that when it comes to arbitration, expect nothing but the unexpected.

Best thing you can do while this is going on is to stay off the web boards. You will go INSANE if you don't.
Reply
Old 09-19-2012 | 06:32 AM
  #269  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: B-777 left
Default

Originally Posted by SOTeric
And you should have an extra 1500 pilots below you on the merged list? Is that fair?
Soteric what they would like at cal after there long strong alpa history is to staple all the ual guys.
Reply
Old 09-19-2012 | 08:17 AM
  #270  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by syd111
Soteric what they would like at cal after there long strong alpa history is to staple all the ual guys.
After reading SEDPA's illuminating comments above I have come to the realization that we are not worthy. We are not brain surgeons, but merely 4th graders dissecting a frog.

Last edited by SpecialTracking; 09-19-2012 at 08:45 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
67
02-25-2012 07:11 PM
EWRflyr
United
23
07-25-2011 09:23 AM
EWR73FO
United
170
02-11-2011 11:10 AM
Roberto
Cargo
147
06-09-2008 04:31 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
17
08-20-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices