Search
Notices

Clear scope breakdown

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2012, 02:07 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by Ottolillienthal View Post
Ding DING DING........We have a winner!

Do you think this scope section is really about the 76 seat RJ?

So, in 10 years we are struggling under this BS contract and unable to negotiate a new one.....and then...........management says (due to circumstances beyond our control) (this is allowed in the TA you know), we are going to reconfigure the RJ's and add seats up to 90 plus seats in them..........then what we gonna do? What's ALPA gonna do? ALPA represents the RJ pilots too ya know. Talk about a conflict of interest.

Meanwhile management drive a battlship through our contract and our scope sectiona and all those yes voters will be saying "no" "no" "this can't be" we were promised this, and that." But,.......read the fine print.............read it again.

It's in there. Management is: 1. Not bound by this scope language due to the get out jail free cards contained in the language with built in loop holes. and 2, there are no penalties for violating the language.

Asssume that any grievances or issues occuring under this "TA" will be decided by a republican NMB or republican courts, who are management friendly and not labor friendly.

End of the day.......90 plus seat RJ's will be flying the lions share of the domestic market and UAL pilots will have little forward progression in the career path with continued downward pressure being placed on earning potential.

Management wins again.

Thanks Zullo.............you bite.
Yeah. Just wait till they farm out the 737s and A320s to Skywest and wet lease A380s from Emirates to fly our passengers. What will we do then?

Sled
jsled is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 04:18 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
A320's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: 787 Capt.
Posts: 638
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27 View Post
You forgot to mention a few

A380.. over 86K
B747.. over 86K
B777.. over 86K
B787.. over 86K
A350.. over 86K
A330.. over 86K
B767.. over 86K
B757.. over 86K
A321.. over 86K
B737.. over 86K
A320.. over 86K
A319.. over 86K
MD90.. over 86K
MD88.. over 86K
B717.. over 86K

oh.. and all pay more over at Delta than at UCAL under this TA.. except of course the A380-
yippie~

Motch
Not exactly true. Our pay banding has some paid less and some paid more. Try not to be so selective with the facts.
A320 is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 04:43 PM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 32
Default

Propeller Planes Come Back Amid High Fuel Prices : NPR

A good reason to include turboprops in scope coverage.
yoter83 is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 06:33 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LCAL dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by jsled View Post
Yeah. Just wait till they farm out the 737s and A320s to Skywest and wet lease A380s from Emirates to fly our passengers. What will we do then?

Sled
Per September 2012 Check Airman meeting, all the 'Busses will be parked by 2015.
LCAL dude is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 06:40 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by LCAL dude View Post
Per September 2012 Check Airman meeting, all the 'Busses will be parked by 2015.
That was before the new plan was announced at the October 2012 Check Airman meeting.

Sled
jsled is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 07:10 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by LCAL dude View Post
Per September 2012 Check Airman meeting, all the 'Busses will be parked by 2015.
Quite possible given unpredictable economic events. Did hear that leases were extended on the 320 fleet (not sure how many and if 319s were even included) as far as 2020. Given that the MAX airplanes start showing up I believe in 2017, that could be about right. But the days of a civilized narrowbody cockpit in which to sit through a long westbound transcon will no doubt be over.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 07:25 PM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

Originally Posted by A320 View Post
Not exactly true. Our pay banding has some paid less and some paid more. Try not to be so selective with the facts.
Delta 2013 12yr Capt - JCBA 2013 yr Capt

A380.. over 86K no pay scale / $330.20
B747.. over 86K $254.74 / $234.78
B777.. over 86K $254.74 / $234.78
B787.. over 86K $244.04 / $234.78
A350.. over 86K no pay scale / $234.78
A330.. over 86K $240.62 / $234.78
B767.. over 86K $240.62-$213.22 / $234.78-$195.82
B757.. over 86K $213.22 / $195.82-$188.97
A321.. over 86K no pay scale / $188.97
B737.. over 86K $205.53-$204.47 / $188.97-$181.24
A320.. over 86K $197.29 / $188.97
A319.. over 86K $197.29 / $181.24
MD90.. over 86K $193.76 / $188.97
MD88.. over 86K $193.76 / $188.97
B717.. over 86K $183.98 / no pay scale

Um.. ok. So, tell me why a United Pilot would make a post like you did yet not back it up with "Facts"?

In 2014, our pay goes up but still lags Delta. Also, Delta (I believe..) goes to 15% B Fund Contribution.
In 2015 we get closer to Delta again.
In 2016 we finally surpass Delta. Oh, but wait. Delta's PWA in amendable in 2015 so by 2016 Delta may (probably) will have a new PWA with payscales that are higher than ours.
Of course, that would mean that 2016 we trail Delta (again).
Same with 2017.. 2018.. 2019.

Only good thing is that we'll probably have a new CBA sometime in 2019. Bad thing is, we'll get pennies to the the dollar in Retro.. and we'll still be behind Delta~ But we'll be getting closer!


Seriously, it's gotten to the point that it's ****ing sad that the UAL Airbus guys (mostly) are doing anything and everything they can to justify their "Yes" Vote.

Motch

PS> You are TECHNICALLY Correct. We are paid more than Delta in some categories. A380, A350 and A321.
You win.
horrido27 is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 07:58 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,083
Default

So the total value of the contract each year is calculated by considering only pay rates and B-fund contributions?
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 10:05 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

^ No Sir..
It's the value of the whole. But that was not the question. A UAL 320 Pilot stated that my post was incorrect. So I posted the payscales.

So let me ask you this-
Do we agree that the pay is behind Delta? Simple Yes or No.

To me (a CAL Pilot) Pay was one of the CornerStones. It has failed.

This thread was about Scope. If you believe that Scope has Passed the CornerStone Test.. ok. To me, it has not.
It is concessionary from a Continental CBA Standpoint.
Is it better than United.. that is questionable.
It is better than Delta.. that is questionable.

One thing is for sure. At Delta, their Scope is tied in with the B717, which pays a decent rate. Our Scope is tied into a "mystery aircraft".
That will pay less than Delta's B717.
Unacceptable.

Work Rules- A few good things, many bad things and a few neutral. CornerStone.. Fail.
From many United guys I've spoken too, they are not too happy with the work rules either.

Last is Retirement and Insurance.
My Opinion, it is one area where the CornerStone was met. But then again, I do not have a frozen A Plan so I can not say if every CAL Pilot agrees on this CornerStone.

So..
After the 4 CornerStones, what do we have left.
LOA25- NO
LOA26- NO
Retro/Signing Bonus- NO

And all the little "gotcha's".
What I don't understand is this. We had Rally's, Picketing Events, a 99% Strike Vote.
"The Loan is Due"
"United Against Outsourcing"

What happened?!

Motch
horrido27 is offline  
Old 11-29-2012, 05:42 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,083
Default

The total value of the contract as a whole lags Delta next year and exceeds it each year thereafter. If you really think that you can get a better deal by sending this thing back to the company and the NMB, go ahead. Thus far, UCH has been a tremendous disappointment in terms of financial and operational performance. If you think this outfit will do fine going forward with a cost structure significantly higher that that of the competition, good luck. I for one have little faith in any management ability to execute in this industry with a significant cost disadvantage in any area. The margins simply aren't there. IF we get a bunch more money injected into this thing to complete the cornerstones to your satisfaction, we can watch this outfit become an even slower and more lethargic competitor than it is now. I sure enjoyed UAL under the ESOP contract far more than I did under Contract 2000 (which lasted all of 2 years). I'll take a strong, competitive company with lots of movement over a weak, shrinking one any day. People forget than in the days before 9/11 UAL's loss estimates for 2001 were on track to exceed a billion dollars that year. 9/11 was simply a catalyst for the inevitable. If you believe this outfit can generate the "synergies" required to pay super premium contracts reference the competition, all I can say is been there done that. Good luck.
CousinEddie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scoop
Major
90
05-26-2012 10:02 AM
B1900YX
Major
50
10-14-2010 06:30 AM
Toccata
Cargo
2
08-09-2007 09:40 AM
purple101
Cargo
3
08-05-2007 05:25 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
1
09-28-2005 05:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices