Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Capt with Capt; FO with FO=LOL >

Capt with Capt; FO with FO=LOL

Search

Notices

Capt with Capt; FO with FO=LOL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2013 | 05:39 AM
  #221  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: B-777 left
Default

Originally Posted by vspeed
Feel better there kid?

Sling your insults if it makes you feel better...your day of reckoning is coming...you can sling gear for me anyday chump. Your unearned ego will be your downfall, and I won't be buying you any beers to drown your sorrows.

By the way we can totally look at longevity...it's how you side chooses to twist it to fit their rationale.

Time not active = no time.
Everytime I read your post it is no wonder your group has had the reputation that it does. I know all of the folks there are not like you but it sure doesnt help reading your input.
Reply
Old 04-17-2013 | 05:40 AM
  #222  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by vspeed
I agree, your lawyers couldn't cross examine Dr. Campbell...
You might want to check the transcript.
Reply
Old 04-17-2013 | 05:44 AM
  #223  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by vspeed
Even the 1400+ on furlough? Those pilots were never coming back
Really? Well they have been coming back and still are. Many of them had more longevity on the merger date than a 2005 hire.

Plus those pesky 1995-1998 hires (about 3,500 of them) that were never furloughed and have 15-18 years of longevity. You can't really think a 2005 hire at the "narrow body gauge airline" is going to be granted an additional 10 years of longevity over the pilots from the "widebody airline".

I'm betting the arbitrators use ALPA merger policy. Others are praying they completely ignore it.
Reply
Old 04-17-2013 | 05:53 AM
  #224  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by vspeed
ual did not change its business model or readjust itself after 9/11...it stubbornly refused to budge and defied the industry to turn itself back to the days of hub/spoke...domestic widebody flying.
It's this kind of lie (or cluelessness?) that makes you look foolish.
Reply
Old 04-17-2013 | 05:54 AM
  #225  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
Many of them had more longevity on the merger date than a 2005 hire.
And by many, I think you mean all of them except perhaps the bottom ~200 hired in 2007-2008 which have nearly identical longevity as the 147 furloughed CAL pilots of the same period.
Reply
Old 04-17-2013 | 06:01 AM
  #226  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
It's this kind of lie (or cluelessness?) that makes you look foolish.
again with the namecalling when losing a discussion you guys crack me up...the crayola crayon comparison is making its stereotype justified
Reply
Old 04-17-2013 | 06:20 AM
  #227  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by vspeed
again with the namecalling when losing a discussion you guys crack me up...the crayola crayon comparison is making its stereotype justified
Pot meet kettle.

Originally Posted by vspeed
you can sling gear for me anyday chump. Your unearned ego will be your downfall, and I won't be buying you any beers to drown your sorrows.
Reply
Old 04-17-2013 | 06:21 AM
  #228  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: A330 First Officer
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
FYI, it IS in arbitration. The hearings began on Monday.

While that is pretty much what happened at DAL/NWA, the UAL/CAL lawyers are making their arguments under the revised ALPA Merger Policy (which was not in effect for DAL/NWA.)
Ok, I went to the ALPA.org site and, of course, couldn't find the new merger policy. The old policy had, if I remember correctly, 5 things that they considered. Could someone post what the new policy contains. Also keep in mind, that while you want the arbitrators to follow ALPA merger policy they can essentially do what they want now that it is in their hands. That was the big drawback that was explained to us over and over. That is also why we wanted three arbitrators versus just one.
Reply
Old 04-17-2013 | 06:55 AM
  #229  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
Ok, I went to the ALPA.org site and, of course, couldn't find the new merger policy. The old policy had, if I remember correctly, 5 things that they considered. Could someone post what the new policy contains. Also keep in mind, that while you want the arbitrators to follow ALPA merger policy they can essentially do what they want now that it is in their hands. That was the big drawback that was explained to us over and over. That is also why we wanted three arbitrators versus just one.
Yup, the 5 required factors for consideration are now 3. Of interest, DAL suggested a solution that generally followed policy while NWA suggested DOH (not in policy). We all know how that turned out.

Here's an article from ALPA that summarizes the revised policy.

FWIW, one of the three arbitrators in DAL/NWA is the head arbitrator in our case so what is old is new again.
Reply
Old 04-17-2013 | 06:57 AM
  #230  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by vspeed
again with the namecalling when losing a discussion you guys crack me up...the crayola crayon comparison is making its stereotype justified
Sorry...I didn't mean to upset your delicate sensibilities. How about I just say "Please read some accurate historical records with an open mind, re-evaluate your assumptions and beliefs, and then make more believable contributions to this forum. Or else you will continue to appear less than credible. Thank you for kindly considering my observations."
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Captain Bligh
United
17
05-08-2011 06:22 PM
DLax85
Cargo
35
04-23-2008 09:26 AM
Flying Ninja
Flight Schools and Training
7
11-01-2006 12:14 PM
WatchThis!
Regional
70
03-10-2006 09:27 AM
CRJammin
Cargo
4
09-16-2005 06:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices