Vacancy Bid
09-27-2013 | 04:53 AM
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
That is the problem.
09-27-2013 | 05:39 AM
#93
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Probe, can you not read??? Show me where in the arbitration and award or the UAL C&Rs it shows what "in the process of training" means and I'm good. Both the CAL C&Rs define it AND the SFO MOU define it in detail.
What is so hard to understand about that? As I said, I'm sure it will be cleared up next month.
What is so hard to understand about that? As I said, I'm sure it will be cleared up next month.
09-27-2013 | 06:33 AM
#94
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
JP has set the CAL guys up for another fall pursuing a weak definition of training. It's possible he feels he can get a sympathy ruling from the abibrators interpretation. The CAL types need to remember that JP created this false hope. You can't steal. Sorry, we won't let you.
09-27-2013 | 07:24 AM
#95
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
So is KARMA!! You sound like a ..., well never mind!! Make sure you identify yourself when getting on a flt. if we ever fly together on the 73!! I want to know what type person I'm flying with. However, doesn't sound like it will be hard to tell with you!!
Quick advice, treat seniority like scoring your first touchdown, ACT like you've been there before!! Good Luck, J"unior"Sled
Quick advice, treat seniority like scoring your first touchdown, ACT like you've been there before!! Good Luck, J"unior"SledGood Day,
Longevity Sled
09-27-2013 | 07:34 AM
#96
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Just because it doesn't say what you want it say doesn't mean it's vague.
Last edited by cadetdrivr; 09-27-2013 at 07:51 AM.
09-27-2013 | 08:13 AM
#97
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
VERY confusing. Kind of like date of hire was also very confusing for some folks at CAL. The Arbs didn't have much trouble figuring it out for you though. So I wouldn't worry this too has a simple definition. TIME to QUIT playing these games folks!!
09-27-2013 | 08:31 AM
#98
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Probe, can you not read??? Show me where in the arbitration and award or the UAL C&Rs it shows what "in the process of training" means and I'm good. Both the CAL C&Rs define it AND the SFO MOU define it in detail.
What is so hard to understand about that? As I said, I'm sure it will be cleared up next month.
What is so hard to understand about that? As I said, I'm sure it will be cleared up next month.
Guys. Don't worry about this little rif. Which is worse? Let them go to training or give them displacement rights? Hopefully we can just move on. There will be plenty of vacancies in the future. JMHO.
Sled
09-27-2013 | 09:51 AM
#99
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
I say let them go to training. That just puts more padding at the bottom for me when I get my bump letter in the near future. I'll just slide in on top them. No problem here.
However, being confused as to what "in training" means is pretty weak no matter how you cut it.
However, being confused as to what "in training" means is pretty weak no matter how you cut it.
09-27-2013 | 09:57 AM
#100
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
A pilot that's been through this vacancy/displacement cycle more than once could argue that it's in everybody's interest to have super junior pilots in every fleet/seat to maximize the ability of more senior pilots to bump anywhere.
This whole thing is clearly being fostered by folks who haven't quite yet grasped the methodology contained in the UPA and/or realized the SLI is over. Seniority always wins in the end.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
