Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United North at it again... >

United North at it again...

Search

Notices

United North at it again...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2014 | 02:02 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
We are only hiring due to retirements, UAL work rules applied to Fred's PE operation and most importantly FAR 117. Growth, NOPE. What you call restrictive in the scope clause will only be seen in the parking of 50 seaters which management has no problem doing as long as the 76 seaters grow, which sure as hades they are. Scope as of right now is not hurting, but the stage has been set for more future small narrowbody outsourcing just as it was by Contract 2000. And I have zero doubt you will vote YES once again to save your own bacon.

Btw if the were hiring as fast as you believe, we would have classes full of New Hires and not half recalls.
We keep hearing this but the hiring outpaces retirements. And we were told 1,500-2,000 jobs lost while it only grows.
Reply
Old 05-23-2014 | 02:41 PM
  #82  
A320's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
If they have not completed training within 92 days of the effective date, then they can execute a bump to any position their seniority can hold, regardless if there is an open bid for it.

That's been in the contract for at least 20 years. It forces the company to train pilots into new vacancies in a timely manner.
Completing training includes IOE or whatever we call it now
Reply
Old 05-23-2014 | 02:47 PM
  #83  
A320's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by flybynuts
There are a couple of things in play here.
Training scheduling moving to ORD has been a nightmare for anybody in training for the last 4-5 months. Yes there have been some that have taken more than the 90 days and some have taken their contractual right. Also there have been some who have/are trying to game the system. One even called in fatigue for a sim two times. These two times appear to be very strategic when you look at the person's schedule. However, there are "eyes on" now trying to monitor this and avoid this from happening.

There may be instructors "helping a bro out," maybe. But it could be the same saying the south is doing it too. All I do know is if someone gets caught doing it then it will be ugly for some, for sure. Deliberate and intentional abuse will end in job loss, just ask the MD of training.

I seriously doubt there are any LCAL guppy instructors helping any LUAL Bro's out.
Reply
Old 05-23-2014 | 03:02 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
We keep hearing this but the hiring outpaces retirements. And we were told 1,500-2,000 jobs lost while it only grows.
Please point me out towards any United-Continental holdings report that indicates growth in mainline ASM's besides fractional due to aircraft shifting? Hiring is only outpacing retirements due to the reasons I listed which are running out. We are actually shrinking in mainline airframes once the summer ends.

http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External...F8VHlwZT0z&t=1
Reply
Old 05-23-2014 | 03:03 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Default

For sure! I meant Cal helping Cal while Ual helps Ual. The whole divisiveness thing and yada yada. If this happens once or twice it is bad but not systemic and shouldn't be thought of as a rampant issue. We had a few that try to go for the gold. Some win and some lose. However doing it unethically is the root issue. One guy with the fatigue calls was being very unethical and he was feeling the heat so he back off. He wanted Den CA so badly that it was clouding his judgement.
Reply
Old 05-23-2014 | 03:04 PM
  #86  
CRM114's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by A320
Completing training includes IOE or whatever we call it now
You've got to notify the company before you start IOE.

8-F-9-a A Pilot’s displacement rights shall expire if he has not exercised his rights prior to his first segment of IOE.
Reply
Old 05-23-2014 | 03:09 PM
  #87  
A320's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by Mitch Rapp05
Yes, if there wasn't a merger those same pilots would be Captains on Continetal airplanes while those junior to them would be foaming at the mouth to fly the "great wide bodies" of your decrepit old and liquidated airline.

But since there was a merger there was a TPA. It was agreed upon by YOUR MEC, and allowed pilots and airplanes to be shuffled around the system on BOTH sides.

Sled, your side got an obvious windfall from the SLI. Quit your arrogant grandstanding and move on.

Explain your concept of a windfall. A 98 hire on UAL sitting next to a CAL guy 05' hire? That windfall? Perhaps having no fence to 52 777s on day one. That windfall?
Reply
Old 05-23-2014 | 04:09 PM
  #88  
SONORA PASS's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Left - Dodge Caravan
Default

Originally Posted by flybynuts
For sure! I meant Cal helping Cal while Ual helps Ual. The whole divisiveness thing and yada yada. If this happens once or twice it is bad but not systemic and shouldn't be thought of as a rampant issue. We had a few that try to go for the gold. Some win and some lose. However doing it unethically is the root issue. One guy with the fatigue calls was being very unethical and he was feeling the heat so he back off. He wanted Den CA so badly that it was clouding his judgement.
Flyby,

You have had some of the best posts on APC, please keep it that way.

If our company is so incredibly screwed up on training scheduling that they are down to the wire by one or two days of contractual limits, how can we say it is the pilot that is being unethical? He is just exercising his seniority and contract. The company does not bend the contract for a few hundred dollars of extra pilot pay even when it cost them over a million (saw this first hand), why should we?

That same pilot likely watched the company shift the DEN flying he once did, back to the 737 he once flew, while not being able to bid on any of those slots. He would likely tell us that was unethical.

None of our pilots should ever fear discipline or termination for a fatigue or sick call…

Once again I have deeply appreciate your contributions here, and would likely have blown right by all of this if it had come from anyone else. Your sir have been a class act, and I hope you stay that way.

This whole ISL issue will work itself out in time, and that DEN pilot just helped the process out by moving the re-balancing process along.

We our in this together.

All the best,

SP
Reply
Old 05-23-2014 | 04:24 PM
  #89  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by A320
Explain your concept of a windfall. A 98 hire on UAL sitting next to a CAL guy 05' hire? That windfall? Perhaps having no fence to 52 777s on day one. That windfall?
1. A LUAL pilot barely hanging on before the merger, being placed about hundreds and hundreds of LCAL pilots. Said pilot could barely hold RSV on your smallest plane, but is now mid range among FO's and some are even going to hold CA in the coming months.

2. Never before furloughed LCAL pilot being stapled below EVERY active LUAL pilot as well as hundreds of pilots that were unemployed at time of merger.

If that's not a windfall, I don't know what is. The SLI was clearly a massive windfall for the LUAL pilots. Quit acting stupid and move on.
Reply
Old 05-23-2014 | 04:28 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
We keep hearing this but the hiring outpaces retirements. And we were told 1,500-2,000 jobs lost while it only grows.
Please point me out towards any United-Continental holdings report that indicates growth in mainline ASM's besides fractional due to aircraft shifting? Hiring is only outpacing retirements due to the reasons I listed which esp in the case of FAR 117 is running out. We are actually shrinking in mainline airframes once the summer ends.

http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External...F8VHlwZT0z&t=1
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
flightmedic01
United
19
08-11-2014 12:16 PM
EWRflyr
United
44
04-26-2014 05:07 AM
APC225
United
24
11-27-2013 05:49 AM
WatchThis!
Major
8
04-01-2006 08:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices