Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Contract extension AIP bullet points >

Contract extension AIP bullet points

Search
Notices

Contract extension AIP bullet points

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2015, 03:33 PM
  #491  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Here we go again. We don't know the details of the TA but as long as the company throws us some $$ and we profess the time value of money we win. Do we need to concern ourselves with the value the company receives in this agreement compared to our contractual gains? There are a lot of questions we don't have answers to.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 04:00 PM
  #492  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking View Post
Here we go again. We don't know the details of the TA but as long as the company throws us some $$ and we profess the time value of money we win. Do we need to concern ourselves with the value the company receives in this agreement compared to our contractual gains? There are a lot of questions we don't have answers to.
Do you think you will ever find out what the company values something at? We will never know how much they value something. What factually we will know is what we get and what got traded away(if anything), and how it impacts our pilot group.
El10 is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 04:11 PM
  #493  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by El10 View Post
Do you think you will ever find out what the company values something at? We will never know how much they value something. What factually we will know is what we get and what got traded away(if anything), and how it impacts our pilot group.
We certainly are screwed for the future. If a value can't be levied on the company's gains, they'll give us a % raise, we scream industry leading, and the company quietly retreats knowing the pilots have unwittingly signed a concessionary agreement.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 04:40 PM
  #494  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Position: FO
Posts: 149
Default

Originally Posted by Outsider View Post
Let me say I'm sorry for this apparent (well maybe more than apparent) but there is no really appropriate place to stick this.
I Know everybody has a lot of things going on right now but I'm going to ask you to take just a minute and contact you congressional rep's and remind them to continue to press the DOT to NOT approve the operation of Norwegian Air (Shuttle) flights in to or out of the U.S> using the Operating Certificate they "bought" in Ireland.
I remind them that we once had a thriving maritime industry that is all but gone today, mainly because of "Flag of Convenience". Shameful at least.
And the belief that Ireland has the money, the manpower or the wherewithal to monitor and oversee the operation and safety of an airline that does not even operate there is a complete fantasy.
I'm not going to try and put this in all the carriers threads (you're just the lucky ones, Ha), maybe one Regional thread.
If any of you can pass this reminder on to the other carriers through your contacts; I think that would be good.
I'm retired so I don't see too many anymore.
Again sorry for the intrusion and thanks for any support.

Flag-of-Convenience Schemes
PilotGR is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 05:48 PM
  #495  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking View Post
Here we go again. We don't know the details of the TA but as long as the company throws us some $$ and we profess the time value of money we win.
We sure like to fixate on our pay rates and the management knows it.
Flytolive is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 06:05 PM
  #496  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,610
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive View Post
We sure like to fixate on our pay rates and the management knows it.
Everyone has different priorities... Hopefully the AIP betters wages for all of us and improves some of our QoL issues for line holders and reserve... We all get a single vote and let the majority decide.
ugleeual is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 06:11 PM
  #497  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,029
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual View Post
Everyone has different priorities... Hopefully the AIP betters wages for all of us and improves some of our QoL issues for line holders and reserve... We all get a single vote and let the majority decide.
I agree with everything, but on a technical note, it's officially a TA now.
UALinIAH is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 06:19 PM
  #498  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper66 View Post
FYI now it's a TA
M2c
It will pass the MEC with
12-8 prediction
Dear United Pilots,

We have completed the language writing to convert the UPA Extension Agreement in Principle (AIP) to a full Tentative Agreement (TA). This work was done carefully and exactingly, which is why it has taken since November 20 to complete. The AIP was a simple five page document; the full TA is fifteen pages.

Your members of the MEC have been supplied a copy of the Tentative Agreement for their consideration. They now have seven days to review the TA before voting on it. I have called for a Special Meeting of the MEC on December 21-22. If the MEC votes to accept the TA, they will then undoubtedly vote to send it to you for Membership Ratification. If the MEC votes to reject the TA, it dies; and we will revert to preparing for a traditional Railway Labor Act, Section 6, negotiation. The UPA’s current amendable date is January 31, 2017.

The contents of the Tentative Agreement remain under MEC confidentiality. While this may be frustrating to some, the MEC needs to complete their governance process before the TA is released to the pilots. This process allows the MEC to take action as a governing body. If the MEC votes to accept the Tentative Agreement and send it out for Membership Ratification, you will receive a copy of the TA immediately. Additionally, there will be explanatory communications to assist you in understanding all components of the TA.

We will advise you of the MEC’s actions after the Special Meeting next week.

We are United,
APC225 is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 06:47 PM
  #499  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by Thor View Post
Short of the company turning over their books and allowing ALPA to review line item pilot costs (not likely), how would you determine fair value?

Surely if that data was available to pilots, the MEC would have it right? IF we are "certainly screwed" for the future, it would be at the hands of the MEC. Given the confidential briefings and resources to review, process, and deliberate the agreement, if the MEC sends it to the membership it's a slam dunk.
Alpa knows the pilot costs. It's the other side of the equation in question. It sure would be a shame if one side claimed industry leading while the other booked a financial gain 2X the cost of the agreement.

Yes the MEC has a benefit of confidential information. If history is a guide, a MEC affirmation is not a slam dunk.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 12-16-2015, 03:08 AM
  #500  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Viperstick's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 280
Default

While disappointing that reserve rule improvements are apparently not part of the AIP, who's to say that we the pilots are not the reason?

I was called as part of the special survey and was asked how important reserve rule improvements were in an agreement. Having sat reserve within the past year, I said very important. However, there are many who were also called who likely have never sat reserve when there are 15 short calls for 16 available pilots, or live in domicile and for whom short call is simply a minor inconvenience. It's possible that the preponderance of survey responses stated that reserve rule improvements are far less important than other issues, and therefore the negotiating committee pressed for improvements in these other areas instead.

As to the "better agreement" later argument, how can anyone say that with a reasonable degree of certainty? Is it a bit of a gamble to accept an agreement now? Yes, but so is rejecting in the hope of getting more later. It will be up to each pilot to determine which gamble has the better odds of success.
Viperstick is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM
Mitch Rapp05
United
49
11-22-2013 07:13 AM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
old gasser
Union Talk
28
06-08-2008 12:31 PM
Sir James
Major
27
07-13-2006 12:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices