Search

Notices

Lufthansa United

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2016 | 12:01 PM
  #31  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

My 727 FE instructor in 95 told me in the past they had to give remedial classes to some new hires. They had to teach them what pressurization, hydraulic systems, etc was. From scratch.
Reply
Old 08-05-2016 | 01:13 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
I don't think accepting a job during a strike qualifies as "striking".

Hi Staller
But weren't they the ones who ended up not crossing the line and stayed on strike when the 539 were the ones who actually tried to be scab? I always thought the 570 were actually decent guys.
Reply
Old 08-05-2016 | 02:49 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
Sorry to burst your bubble. I was hired April '87. There were several in my class that had less than 1000 hrs, in fact one only had 650. I was in the first group to be interviewed after the pool of interviewies were used from the strike.

The 650 person had a very rough time getting through but we did have a lot of other experience in the class with some prior heavy time. In the end, we got everyone though, and a lot of instructing on our own to do it.

Our 727 FE class was the shortest in UAL history--which didn't help any. Right after our class, UAL announced that they had lost the EEOC discrimination hiring law suit. Everything changed. I'm sure our class was impacted by the "new requirements."

Well Dave if you read my post it was a response to the writer who posted United hired 250 hour pilots. Additionally you confirmed what I wrote, most had at least ATP and the bottom you experienced was 650 hours. When I was hired in 78 the lowest time person (a woman) had 850 or so hours and I'm sure there were others with slightly less, but not many. However, as you confirm the minimum allowed in the app was 350 and even the interns had more than that.

I was an LCA on the 737-200 in 95 and the lowest time F/O new hire I checked out was an intern with around 650+ hours.

So you didn't bust a single bubble at all you confirmed what I posted.

Thank you very much.

To the other poster:

Now were the 570 ever scabs? How many times does this have to be answered? NO! I believe only two actually crossed the picket line.

Last edited by Regularguy; 08-05-2016 at 03:19 PM.
Reply
Old 08-05-2016 | 02:59 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
Default

Oh and Dave the subject was minimum hours and you turned it into deficiency as pilots. You may have forgotten the senior caps when you were hired had many who were hired with almost no time and In their day the initial new-hire class was close to three months, mostly learning how to build the airplane systems.

Today it's a switchology approach to systems, read the check list, turn it off or on, check the inop list and then apply a performance penalty. Much simpler approach and it meets minimum FAA required system knowledge.
Reply
Old 08-05-2016 | 03:00 PM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MacrossJet
Where does it state that?
I know people in the program already
Reply
Old 08-06-2016 | 06:18 AM
  #36  
tm602's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 792
Likes: 8
From: Just a pilot
Default

I know the focus is UAL here, but this may ruinate things at ATCA. "academy type" instructors eager for a job will work there for next to nothing just for the promise of a flow to UAL.
When I was there, ATCA was a very good job and it pays pretty decent. Now its going to be peanuts. There always seems to be a turd in the punchbowl.
Reply
Old 08-07-2016 | 10:03 AM
  #37  
ClickClickBoom's Avatar
MK Ultra Candidate
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: Prime Leader of Boko Harumph
Default

"Once selected and hired by United, these pilots would start as United "new hires" and would be eligible to fly aircraft in United's narrow body fleet. "

When would they be eligible to "fly" the entire fleet? Which part of the contract separates the fleets and allows limiting pilots to a type?

Black helicopters aside, there is way more to this than what is currently shown.
Reply
Old 08-07-2016 | 10:10 AM
  #38  
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 6
From: 777
Default

Originally Posted by ClickClickBoom
"Once selected and hired by United, these pilots would start as United "new hires" and would be eligible to fly aircraft in United's narrow body fleet. "

When would they be eligible to "fly" the entire fleet? Which part of the contract separates the fleets and allows limiting pilots to a type?
Just in case, you don't really know, it doesn't. New hires have not hit wide bodies yet, although it's getting very close. 2 & 3 year guys have been getting a lot of 777 F/O bids.

The 767 fleet is the exception. The 767 is really a wide body, but for pay, it's a bit weird. Many new hires on the 767/757.
Reply
Old 08-07-2016 | 10:13 AM
  #39  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ClickClickBoom
"Once selected and hired by United, these pilots would start as United "new hires" and would be eligible to fly aircraft in United's narrow body fleet. "

When would they be eligible to "fly" the entire fleet? Which part of the contract separates the fleets and allows limiting pilots to a type?

Black helicopters aside, there is way more to this than what is currently shown.
Black helicopters aside, it's simply a figure of speech written by somebody in the basement of the PR department. Once hired the only restriction is what their seniority can hold.

Sometimes hoof prints are simply evidence of horses.
Reply
Old 08-07-2016 | 10:20 AM
  #40  
Lerxst's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: B787 CA - SFO
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr

Sometimes hoof prints are simply evidence of horses.
As opposed to hoof noises..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHFXG3r_0B8
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
iahflyr
Regional
104
10-19-2015 06:05 AM
APC225
United
24
11-27-2013 05:49 AM
LAX Pilot
United
66
09-03-2013 09:57 PM
WatchThis!
Major
8
04-01-2006 08:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices