Search
Notices

1st UA 773 ER >>>

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-04-2016, 06:42 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking View Post
How do you reconcile with those who are in the latter part of their career when your change in pay scheme occurs?
I know let's start a new pay scale for all new hires and those with more than 10 years to go. We'll pay those old dudes a premium pay based on GW and Airspeed and the rest a three-tiered system which pays more in the first ten years but less at the 12 year point for the old dudes who fly the big heavy jets.

What will we call this new pay scale?

Can anyone envision the problems here?
Regularguy is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 09:23 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Shrek's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,821
Default

Pay banding is DOA - it needs to be squashed once and for all.
Shrek is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 09:51 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
Default

Fill out your contract surveys, and stop "negotiating in public."
Grumble is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 10:01 AM
  #64  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

Originally Posted by Shrek View Post
Pay banding is DOA - it needs to be squashed once and for all.
Why?
What would be wrong with 4 bands-
Small Narrow Body
Large Narrow Body
Small Wide Body
Large Wide Body

Then have a 4 engine override just like we have an International override?
And maybe a stretch override as they increase seating in current models?

Planes will always be moved around different bases/coasts. Proof is what is happening (again) to the 756 in EWR.
For many EWR based pilots, we will see a decrease in pay between 1grand and up to $3300 (for the top ten percent) in the coming months. All because the 76-4 is being moved to IAD and replaced with the 76-3.
[between $35-$50 difference in pay per hour]

Another example is the 74. It is slated to leave in 2017/2018 (unless things change..). To be replaced by the A350's and possible 777-3's. Had we done a separate pay rate for the whale, all those pilots would be seeing paycutes when they get displaced off the plane.

Pay banding CAN work if done correctly. Also note.. every airline has some sort of pay banding.. just a question of how many bands? Should it be 10 (like Delta, with 17 listed aircraft), or 4 (like American, with 14 listed aircraft), or 4 like we already have, here at United?.. with 13 types.

Should the 787-8 pay the same as a 787-10..? Or could it pay Small Wide Body pay vs. Large WideBody pay (with a possible stretch override?)

Good discussions to have. Guess it all comes down to -
Do we want a payscale with a small top end thereby honoring supreme seniority, or
Do we want the most possible pilots making the highest possible wages?

Always
Motch
horrido27 is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 10:06 AM
  #65  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble View Post
Fill out your contract surveys, and stop "negotiating in public."
Here we go again with the "Stop negotiating in Public"

We are not negotiating.. we are discussing things.

There are less than 100 pilots who get involved with these discussions.. probably a few thousand lurkers.
100 out of 12500 = .8% of the pilot group.

Give it a break.

Motch
horrido27 is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 10:10 AM
  #66  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

And back to the 777-3 talks..
Good looking airplane.
And at $314/$214 per hour (in Jan), not bad...

Motch
horrido27 is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 10:13 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,029
Default

The 767-400 had NO business being banded up. It caused all the other WB pilots to get less pay. It was a product of JPOS and his attempt at gaming the SLI. Sorry no sympathy from most. You had an artificial payraise for a while. If you want full time WB pay, bid WB equipment. Otherwise it's just like SRM money. Enjoy when you get but never budget your life around it.
UALinIAH is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 10:50 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 424
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking View Post
How do you reconcile with those who are in the latter part of their career when your change in pay scheme occurs?
Same way "age 65" was reconciled with those who were in their early career
mrmak2 is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 10:57 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by mrmak2 View Post
Same way "age 65" was reconciled with those who were in their early career
Not only achieving a pay scheme of your preference but righting the wrongs of your perceived injustices. What a tangled web you weave...
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 11:09 AM
  #70  
Banned
 
buscappy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 216
Default pay bands

message board geeks (like me) like to get all normative in the discussions. which is fine. enjoy.
but the objective, descriptive message about pay bands is - well, see earlier posts.
with broad bands, the senior pilots will hold the top third of every seat at every base. and the middle and bottom will complain about the crappy schedules and the need to fix the reserve rules.
with pay gradients, pilots can choose between money or schedule.
I couldn't care less what the mobs vote for. just be careful what you wish for.
unless we just do away with seniority altogether, which the bottom half will prefer - until they move into the top half
buscappy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vbguy01
Career Questions
1
11-12-2015 03:04 PM
globalexpress
Pilot Health
6
12-31-2010 03:01 PM
PEACH
Major
90
08-20-2009 05:01 PM
Clue32
Regional
26
02-25-2008 09:25 PM
undflyboy06
Flight Schools and Training
4
09-22-2006 07:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices