Search

Notices

17-03v

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2016 | 11:20 AM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 33
From: 777 CA
Default

New snapshot out. Personally the biggest surprise to me is how junior DEN Bus CA is currently. I doubt that will remain though.
Reply
Old 11-10-2016 | 11:29 AM
  #42  
awax's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UALinIAH
New snapshot out. Personally the biggest surprise to me is how junior DEN Bus CA is currently. I doubt that will remain though.
Go to PBS and pull the pairings - mystery solved! I'm happy that there's the opportunity for guys to chase the money. Maybe I'm getting lazy in my old age, but chasing that carrot isn't all there is for me.
Reply
Old 11-10-2016 | 01:18 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by awax
So your premise is that the career owes you something but owes pilots who lost their pensions as they retired at 60 nothing? And it's only you who has "...suffered under onerous economic conditions...".

Tool.
The career needs to be rewarding in the here and now so that in the future it will be both secure and financially rewarding. In order for that to be so it should be predictable so that the pilots can manage their decision-making.

When the age limit gets raised the safety bar gets lowered. I don't believe the cognative skills are what they were. ALPA ignores this, and I think it's a mistake.

Those pilots who are already retired at age 60 are no longer part of the craft and class, and therefore it would be both illegal and a conflict of interest to negotiate on their behalf as they are no longer dues paying members in good standing. They may feel free to write their congressman, but they have no standing in ALPA. So your question as it pertains to those who retired at age 60 is moot indeed.

I presume that all of those between the ages of 40 to 65 (presently flying) have suffered under onerous conditions in one form or another depending on who and where they were flying. I don't presume that I am the only one who has been affected by the combination of mergers, age 65, and post 9-11 contractual give-backs, seniority erosion, seniority stagnation and retirement/benefit reductions (or freezes).

Another words, those in the aviation industry post 9-11 were uniquely affected by the trifecta of doom: contractual give-backs, monetary give-backs, and career reversion.

I would hope that our bargaining unit and the worlds largest aviation union will be proactive to insure we don't experience that trifecta of doom again. The three legs of the stool need to be in place for this career to be worth the investment. Strong Contracts, Competitive pay/benefits, and a predictable career path. if one, two, or three legs of the stool get broken this career will surely suck again. I pay my dues to make sure this career doesn't suck.
Reply
Old 11-10-2016 | 02:41 PM
  #44  
socalflyboy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Cal reserve..the gift that keeps on giving
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
That's true. BUT..............ALPA could be proactive and look these foreigners into the eye and stare them down and say NO, oh NO you don't. Instead of ALPA's ineffective efforts in shadow-boxing open skies and NAI maybe we could influence events at ICAO.
Yeah, like Alpa stared them in the eye and said wearing a dumb *** green vest on a walk around and said No!
Reply
Old 11-14-2016 | 04:45 PM
  #45  
detpilot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
From: Trying not to crash
Default

Man, they sure seem to be shrinking Fifi in ORD! What happened to "ORD, DEN, IAH, and SFO"?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 11-14-2016 | 04:51 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by awax
So your premise is that the career owes you something but owes pilots who lost their pensions as they retired at 60 nothing? And it's only you who has "...suffered under onerous economic conditions...".

Tool.
Some forced out at 60 were essentially cast aside with little to no safety net. Makes you appreciate what you have.
Reply
Old 11-14-2016 | 05:22 PM
  #47  
oldmako's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 3
From: The GF of FUPM
Default

My net is sporting a gaping hole this as of this week. Make your 401k suffer again?
Reply
Old 11-14-2016 | 05:42 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
My net is sporting a gaping hole this as of this week. Make your 401k suffer again?
Buy gold.


Reply
Old 11-15-2016 | 10:07 AM
  #49  
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
Default

It'll be interesting to see how today's announcement of deferring 61 737s indefine tly affect this bid and the future bids.

I fly with quite a few FOs who were waiting for those 737s to arrive before upgrading so they could have better seniority. I imagine a lot of bypasse pilots are going to jump to the CA seat now that growth is off the table. Upgrade time probably just went from 5 years to 10.

WB FO seats are probably going to go more senior now too........grab a seat you want now or you are going to miss the boat. Well still have upward movement but at a much slower rate than we all planed.
Reply
Old 11-15-2016 | 10:14 AM
  #50  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
It'll be interesting to see how today's announcement of deferring 61 737s indefine tly affect this bid and the future bids.

I fly with quite a few FOs who were waiting for those 737s to arrive before upgrading so they could have better seniority. I imagine a lot of bypasse pilots are going to jump to the CA seat now that growth is off the table. Upgrade time probably just went from 5 years to 10.

WB FO seats are probably going to go more senior now too........grab a seat you want now or you are going to miss the boat. Well still have upward movement but at a much slower rate than we all planed.
I doubt it. Much of this bidding was happening before the announcement of the new planes. I predict it doesn't change anything. We are still hiring 630 next year which is more than last year.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices