Search

Notices

2017 UPS Hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2017 | 11:44 AM
  #471  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: Retired from APC.
Default

You could do both....
Reply
Old 02-22-2017 | 06:26 AM
  #472  
Swedish Blender's Avatar
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 14
From: fins to the left, fins to the right
Default

Anyone know where the guy who was hired in January and just quit went?
Reply
Old 02-22-2017 | 06:31 AM
  #473  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 130
Default

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
Anyone know where the guy who was hired in January and just quit went?

Word on the street is he returned to his previous part 91 job.

That would make three corporate hires since 2015 that have done that. I hope that does not cause HR to ignore 91 pilots going forward.
Reply
Old 02-22-2017 | 06:45 AM
  #474  
Swedish Blender's Avatar
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 14
From: fins to the left, fins to the right
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
I hope that does not cause HR to ignore 91 pilots going forward.
While pilots from other backgrounds have left for legacies, I would have to think HR will be somewhat skeptical of 91 pilots based on the percentages hired versus those who return.
Reply
Old 02-22-2017 | 07:25 AM
  #475  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 309
Likes: 1
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
While pilots from other backgrounds have left for legacies, I would have to think HR will be somewhat skeptical of 91 pilots based on the percentages hired versus those who return.
I would think that the HR folks are smarter than to think that even three pilots represent an entire group of thousands.
Reply
Old 02-22-2017 | 09:12 AM
  #476  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 FO
Default

Originally Posted by kme9418
I would think that the HR folks are smarter than to think that even three pilots represent an entire group of thousands.


I wouldn't disagree.... but how many do you hire to prove you're not wrong, when 1,000s of others are in the wings.

I will never judge an individual for making a personal decision they feel is best for their situation. But I do hate to see that in the past several months those who have quit or had training issues... were corporate people.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 02-22-2017 | 09:19 AM
  #477  
Swedish Blender's Avatar
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 14
From: fins to the left, fins to the right
Default

Originally Posted by kme9418
I would think that the HR folks are smarter than to think that even three pilots represent an entire group of thousands.
I didn't know UPS hired thousands of 91 pilots.

With such a small sample size HR has for 91 pilots, I think the percentages could make them think twice.

I'm not going to look back the last year, but say UPS has hired 15 and 3 have gone back. 20% will definitely get their attention.
Reply
Old 02-22-2017 | 04:09 PM
  #478  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 330
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender

I'm not going to look back the last year, but say UPS has hired 15 and 3 have gone back. 20% will definitely get their attention.
There's generally 5-6 Part 91/135 guys per class of 20-24. With three classes last year and three this year (that are beyond indoc), that's probably 30ish that have been hired. If 3 have left for their previous jobs, it's 10%. Not a huge number but definitely more than we would like to see, being a former corporate guy. Put in the effort and you'll do fine. This ain't FSI or CAE anymore fellas.
Reply
Old 02-22-2017 | 08:04 PM
  #479  
Swedish Blender's Avatar
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 14
From: fins to the left, fins to the right
Default

Originally Posted by CL300
There's generally 5-6 Part 91/135 guys per class of 20-24. With three classes last year and three this year (that are beyond indoc), that's probably 30ish that have been hired. If 3 have left for their previous jobs, it's 10%. Not a huge number but definitely more than we would like to see, being a former corporate guy. Put in the effort and you'll do fine. This ain't FSI or CAE anymore fellas.
Since I'm in the middle of a long layover, I went back to the beginning of 2016 new hire classes.

Part 135/91k- 12
Part 91 - 16

28 out of 149 hired
The 135/91k guys haven't gone back (I'm sure seniority has a lot to do with it), so if you take the 3 pure 91 guys, its 18.75%.
Reply
Old 02-23-2017 | 01:21 AM
  #480  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 330
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
Since I'm in the middle of a long layover, I went back to the beginning of 2016 new hire classes.

Part 135/91k- 12
Part 91 - 16

28 out of 149 hired
The 135/91k guys haven't gone back (I'm sure seniority has a lot to do with it), so if you take the 3 pure 91 guys, its 18.75%.
Thanks for the research- I'm off work for awhile so I sure wasn't gonna do it. 😆

That percentage is way too high and it's unfortunate. Like I said before, put in the effort and you'll get through the program. It ain't rocket surgery.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1st Supersonic
Atlas/Polar
20693
04-29-2026 07:35 AM
jlg79
Cargo
160
05-24-2014 09:27 AM
767pilot
Cargo
115
10-15-2009 06:19 PM
FR8K9
Cargo
12
10-06-2008 05:02 AM
Cujo
Cargo
4
10-01-2007 10:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices