Search
Notices
Air Wisconsin Regional Airline

UA 50 seat announcement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2021, 08:39 AM
  #51  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,291
Default

Originally Posted by GA2Jets View Post
You and I both know that the regional industry changes quickly and often unpredictably. There's no particular reason to think that G7s flying couldn't be taken away (see Xjets 175 program) or that just because you don't know what's next doesn't mean there's nothing at all (see AW losing the AA contract).

Your certainty of demise isn't any more justified than my optimism.
Im just being a realist . Look at the facts and make whatever decision you feel is best for you and your family. I just hope you don’t get caught with your pants around your ankles .
As far as certainty? The one thing I am certain of is the regional landscape on the UA side is going to look a lot different in the very near future.
That I’m certain of . Draw your own conclusions and proceed with caution because the objects in the mirror are closer than they appear 🤣😅
idlethrust is offline  
Old 07-01-2021, 10:32 AM
  #52  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,541
Default

Originally Posted by GA2Jets View Post
Your certainty of demise isn't any more justified than my optimism.
It is nonetheless true that optimists are disappointed more often than pessimists, and pessimists are pleasantly surprised more often than optimists…
Excargodog is offline  
Old 07-01-2021, 11:53 AM
  #53  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,291
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
It is nonetheless true that optimists are disappointed more often than pessimists, and pessimists are pleasantly surprised more often than optimists…
What if I’m an optimistic pessimist?
idlethrust is offline  
Old 07-01-2021, 12:15 PM
  #54  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,322
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld View Post
I will make a prediction. There will be several regionals flying 50 seaters exclusively that will merge/integrate into other airlines or close in the next few years. The handwriting is on the wall with United. I expect AA and Delta will follow reducing their 50 seater flying.
Well, yeah. The 50's are getting old and are out of production. And while their narrower hulls helped with gas mileage compared to the original 170, the newer 70-seat RJ's are more efficient.

Their niche is getting pretty narrow: short range and close to 50 pax... not many fewer and not many more.

Also they have to consider do they want to do a planned. controlled drawdown, or wait to flail when some age-related problem that impacts reliability or, worse, safety? UAX lost a small, aging fleet to a sudden safety problem not too long ago.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-01-2021, 08:10 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 242
Default

Originally Posted by coodrough568 View Post
Can someone tell me where this new flying is going to come from? UA is scoped out on large RJ’s, that’s why the 550 is even a thing. So the questions that can’t be answered: Where is this flying coming from? And where are the planes coming from?

Who do you guys think the flying will be for, Spirit?
...remember that ZW did the whole AirTran Jet Connect thing, so that idea isn't as outlandish as most would think.
flightlessbirds is offline  
Old 07-02-2021, 04:03 AM
  #56  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,291
Default

Originally Posted by flightlessbirds View Post
...remember that ZW did the whole AirTran Jet Connect thing, so that idea isn't as outlandish as most would think.
Some people are so dillusional. What happened 30 years ago has no bearing or effect on the market / customer demands of today .I seriously doubt if spirit or southwest wants 65 old 50 seaters.
Ua is scoped out , Delta is parking theirs , aa definitely dosent want them .
Id like to think there is hope but reality is setting in .
I wonder what the price of scrap aluminum /sheet metal is going for these days? They might want to check .
idlethrust is offline  
Old 07-02-2021, 05:07 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 407
Default

Originally Posted by coodrough568 View Post
Can someone tell me where this new flying is going to come from? UA is scoped out on large RJ’s, that’s why the 550 is even a thing. So the questions that can’t be answered: Where is this flying coming from? And where are the planes coming from?

Who do you guys think the flying will be for, Spirit?
There are a couple of possibilities. One is that with 900s fairly available on the market, AW could bid against 175 flying, try to replace a current 175 operator's market, say Mesa or Republic. Republic is probably most vulnerable because they are expensive and are mostly in ORD and EWR. Another similar possibility is that the increase in NB flying actually allows for more 76 seat aircraft, maybe allowing for a space for some 900s.

Another possibility is that AW flies some 200s to small markets and some 550s, so a mixed product instead of just the one. Another possibility is trying to bid any of those types of flying for Delta, AA or even a new venture.

Personally, my money is on competing directly against G7 for 550 flying while trying to get a small slice of the 76 seat market. Delta and AA use many 900s, there's no reason to think that at the right price point, UA wouldn't do the same.
GA2Jets is offline  
Old 07-02-2021, 05:09 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 407
Default

Originally Posted by idlethrust View Post
Some people are so dillusional. What happened 30 years ago has no bearing or effect on the market / customer demands of today .I seriously doubt if spirit or southwest wants 65 old 50 seaters.
Ua is scoped out , Delta is parking theirs , aa definitely dosent want them .
Id like to think there is hope but reality is setting in .
I wonder what the price of scrap aluminum /sheet metal is going for these days? They might want to check .
We get it, you think its over. Totally and completely receiving the message of doom.
GA2Jets is offline  
Old 07-02-2021, 05:32 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: B747 FO
Posts: 610
Default

Originally Posted by GA2Jets View Post
There are a couple of possibilities. One is that with 900s fairly available on the market, AW could bid against 175 flying, try to replace a current 175 operator's market, say Mesa or Republic. Republic is probably most vulnerable because they are expensive and are mostly in ORD and EWR. Another similar possibility is that the increase in NB flying actually allows for more 76 seat aircraft, maybe allowing for a space for some 900s.

Another possibility is that AW flies some 200s to small markets and some 550s, so a mixed product instead of just the one. Another possibility is trying to bid any of those types of flying for Delta, AA or even a new venture.

Personally, my money is on competing directly against G7 for 550 flying while trying to get a small slice of the 76 seat market. Delta and AA use many 900s, there's no reason to think that at the right price point, UA wouldn't do the same.
failry good analysis, the big question is that if AW is going to compete against G7 for 550 flying, then where would you get the airframes? The only solution seems to be to outbid G7’for their contract and get their planes. Most of which belong to SkyWest and some to Mesa.
JohnnyBekkestad is offline  
Old 07-02-2021, 05:38 AM
  #60  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,291
Default

Originally Posted by GA2Jets View Post
There are a couple of possibilities. One is that with 900s fairly available on the market, AW could bid against 175 flying, try to replace a current 175 operator's market, say Mesa or Republic. Republic is probably most vulnerable because they are expensive and are mostly in ORD and EWR. Another similar possibility is that the increase in NB flying actually allows for more 76 seat aircraft, maybe allowing for a space for some 900s.

Another possibility is that AW flies some 200s to small markets and some 550s, so a mixed product instead of just the one. Another possibility is trying to bid any of those types of flying for Delta, AA or even a new venture.

Personally, my money is on competing directly against G7 for 550 flying while trying to get a small slice of the 76 seat market. Delta and AA use many 900s, there's no reason to think that at the right price point, UA wouldn't do the same.
I think you’re missing some valuable information here.In order to get more large rjs UA needed to buy a NEW NB fleet type, like an e195 or a220 . They did NOT .Therefore, scope dosent allow any additional large rjs - PERIOD.
Yes they can bid for any additional 7/900 flying but do you really think ZW can underbid Mesa and Skywest and operate on a profit ?Not likely.
All of the 700 Skywest operates they own , Mesa owns all of its 900s.
Skywest has few DL owned 900s I think but not many .
So even if they miraculously find some to buy , where are they going to place them ?
Im not predicting doom and gloom but you have to look at facts and come to your own conclusion.
idlethrust is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wildmanny
Cargo
150
10-17-2014 07:13 AM
satpak77
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-05-2014 02:09 PM
GoCats67
United
10
03-31-2014 11:48 AM
Max Glide
Regional
41
04-16-2009 07:17 AM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
1
11-18-2005 08:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices