Search
Notices
Air Wisconsin Regional Airline

Air Wisconsin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2017, 09:53 PM
  #5051  
doin time
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: RJ Left
Posts: 435
Default

Flows to a legacy with 2:1 longevity.
You guys shouldn't have made those lateral movements to other regionals after all. 😉
slammer1906 is offline  
Old 02-16-2017, 11:01 PM
  #5052  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,899
Default

Originally Posted by billyho View Post
Why would United come to AWAC? Hell they've got what they wanted in the 50 seat market with CommutAir and the East Coast flying. Plus I'm sure they remembered how AWAC left them to run off to US Airways in the past. Well maybe they don't hold a grudge like Delta does but still I don't see anything there.
It's business- money talks BS walks...

In the Nov 2016 investors call Kirby pointed out that Uniteds Domestic market has the greatest potential to improve profitability and has a fleet utilization that needed to be reviewed/adjusted. Additionally he pointed out that that United isn't maximizing its RJ scope.

If United could find a way to increase profitability on domestic routes by utilizing AWAC, why wouldn't they? It's not Like Kirby doesn't know how much they currently cost for AA and doesn't have the ability to exploit the desperation of AWACS owners into a better deal than some of Uniteds other contract carriers in exchange keeping them from shutting doors. Look how AAs WOs were treated under Kirbys tenure. There's no reason a struggling AWAC couldn't be used to whipsaw Uniteds other contract carriers into a more profitable deal, even if it's for another short period of time.

If that happens it wouldn't be unreasonable for United to make AWAC a CPP partner to add another source of pilots as well as provide the movement to keep AWAC staffed and enticing to prospective applicants.

Does it mean anything is certain? No, but currently United is probably AWACs best hope for a deal with a legacy partner before they shut down due to Uniteds pending restructuring of domestic routes to increase profits.

The only silver lining in the whole situation is that AWACs pilots will be able to find jobs elsewhere if the company ends up shutting its doors.
Otterbox is offline  
Old 02-17-2017, 02:22 AM
  #5053  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 397
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox View Post
It's business- money talks BS walks...

In the Nov 2016 investors call Kirby pointed out that Uniteds Domestic market has the greatest potential to improve profitability and has a fleet utilization that needed to be reviewed/adjusted. Additionally he pointed out that that United isn't maximizing its RJ scope.

If United could find a way to increase profitability on domestic routes by utilizing AWAC, why wouldn't they? It's not Like Kirby doesn't know how much they currently cost for AA and doesn't have the ability to exploit the desperation of AWACS owners into a better deal than some of Uniteds other contract carriers in exchange keeping them from shutting doors. Look how AAs WOs were treated under Kirbys tenure. There's no reason a struggling AWAC couldn't be used to whipsaw Uniteds other contract carriers into a more profitable deal, even if it's for another short period of time.

If that happens it wouldn't be unreasonable for United to make AWAC a CPP partner to add another source of pilots as well as provide the movement to keep AWAC staffed and enticing to prospective applicants.

Does it mean anything is certain? No, but currently United is probably AWACs best hope for a deal with a legacy partner before they shut down due to Uniteds pending restructuring of domestic routes to increase profits.

The only silver lining in the whole situation is that AWACs pilots will be able to find jobs elsewhere if the company ends up shutting its doors.
Uh huh. Did you read some company memo to verify all this or are you just putting pieces together in your own head.
StrykerB21 is offline  
Old 02-17-2017, 03:37 AM
  #5054  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 857
Default

Meanwhile, two weeks go by and not a single peep from the union about that little fiasco they started. No apology, no explanation... Must be too embarrassed to show their faces.
sweetholyjesus is offline  
Old 02-17-2017, 03:43 AM
  #5055  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 857
Default

Originally Posted by squib View Post
It's already been said there's a lot of overthinking to this situation. Airlineapps.com is a third party tool. UAL doesn't run that website. Selecting the box is simply a way separating the tall stack of resumes. They could have also said "select that you have 99 hours on the space shuttle." It's just a way to sort the stack. Relax and move on.
Originally Posted by squib View Post
You aren't falsifying your application if it's to one specific airline and that's what they are telling you to do to move you're resume to a different pile. Think outside the box, or maybe just click the box in this case.
No apologies received from this guy either. Still got that box clicked??
sweetholyjesus is offline  
Old 02-17-2017, 03:53 AM
  #5056  
Tier 3 Candidate
 
el jefe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Canadair Gosh
Posts: 609
Default

I think we are finally going to be the launch customer for the CRJX/CRJ-1000 in the US for United.
el jefe is offline  
Old 02-17-2017, 04:04 AM
  #5057  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 174
Default

I wouldn't wait until they shut the doors considering the senority based system we work in. Especially FOs. If your an older Captain maybe ride it out.
Jet Jockey 00 is offline  
Old 02-17-2017, 04:27 AM
  #5058  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 857
Default

My guess is there will be a lot of decision making in May. It could be a $40,000 move depending on where you go. If they don't announce something by then, it may be too late.
sweetholyjesus is offline  
Old 02-17-2017, 05:54 AM
  #5059  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 237
Default

Originally Posted by el jefe View Post
I think we are finally going to be the launch customer for the CRJX/CRJ-1000 in the US for United.
Have you actually seen one in YUL? They're so awkwardly long. Like an ExtenZe experiment gone horrifyingly wrong.
Grumbletrousers is offline  
Old 02-17-2017, 06:54 AM
  #5060  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 397
Default

An FO told me he heard from a friend who overheard a flight attendant whos friends with a captain at Emirates that AWAC will be a wholly owned for them. Guaranteed two year flow into an Emirates A380. Makes total sense. This is Chewbacca. He is a Wookie. What is a Wookie doing on Endor.
StrykerB21 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Duksrule
Hangar Talk
4
11-09-2011 06:56 AM
freightdog
Regional
64
12-03-2009 02:17 PM
Jurassic Jet
Cargo
26
11-15-2007 07:16 AM
flystraightin
Major
4
05-31-2006 06:31 AM
Sir James
Hangar Talk
0
08-04-2005 04:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices