seniority proposals outcome analysis
06-01-2018 | 05:51 AM
#31
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,886
Likes: 684
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Yes, this only shows pilots who will be integrated. The post-merger hires will be junior to all affected pilots from all groups and will therefore have no impact on the career progression for senior affected pilots in any merged scenario.
The data model presents outcome information based on highest ranked position possible for all pilots at all times. This doesn't happen in the real world but is extremely useful for building outcome results which are determined by known variables such as list order or conditions and restrictions while controlling the unknown personal choice variables. So while pre-merger pilots could choose to bid positions normally held by post-merger pilots, that is not a reflection of maximum bidding power and won't be included in the model. In short, the results indicate the best everyone could do from each group under both proposals.
Also as mentioned on the chart website, the data used to create the charts is an estimate from the submitted proposals. To be more accurate, specific inputs concerning inactives, job counts, etc. would be needed.
The data model presents outcome information based on highest ranked position possible for all pilots at all times. This doesn't happen in the real world but is extremely useful for building outcome results which are determined by known variables such as list order or conditions and restrictions while controlling the unknown personal choice variables. So while pre-merger pilots could choose to bid positions normally held by post-merger pilots, that is not a reflection of maximum bidding power and won't be included in the model. In short, the results indicate the best everyone could do from each group under both proposals.
Also as mentioned on the chart website, the data used to create the charts is an estimate from the submitted proposals. To be more accurate, specific inputs concerning inactives, job counts, etc. would be needed.
06-01-2018 | 06:11 AM
#32
Thread Starter
New Hire
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Then your bands for FO R / FO B / CA R / CA B are invalid and confusing because there are already post-merger pilots on property. There should be some pilots at the bottom (FO reserve and junior FO B range) whose seniority does not change under any proposal. IIRC Anyone hired after about Apr 2017? Those people provide a bottom buffer anyone subject to the SLI.
There is further explaination on the website or feel free to PM me if you would like. Glad to have the good questions.
06-01-2018 | 07:49 AM
#33
Flies With The Hat On
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Right of the Left Seat
Then your bands for FO R / FO B / CA R / CA B are invalid and confusing because there are already post-merger pilots on property. There should be some pilots at the bottom (FO reserve and junior FO B range) whose seniority does not change under any proposal. IIRC Anyone hired after about Apr 2017? Those people provide a bottom buffer anyone subject to the SLI.
This analysis is excellent Python.
—I hope you post more of your analysis these proposed lists in your many other charting formats such as what you have here: www.rubydatasystems.com/gallery.html
06-01-2018 | 03:15 PM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: 737
06-01-2018 | 04:02 PM
#35
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 1
06-01-2018 | 05:39 PM
#36
On Reserve
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 175
Likes: 1
06-02-2018 | 01:29 AM
#37
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
06-02-2018 | 11:44 AM
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 0
From: Fetal
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
