Search
Notices

5/2020 bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2019, 01:35 PM
  #101  
Line Holder
 
fifidriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Position: Line bidding sucks!
Posts: 96
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy8784 View Post
The big question is.....how long can an airline with exponential growth planned like SWA hold out for before they consider scooping us up?
Hopefully, not long at all! 😉
fifidriver is offline  
Old 12-17-2019, 01:40 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 936
Default

Originally Posted by fifidriver View Post
Hopefully, not long at all!


I’m not sure I want to be at the bottom of SWA seniority list...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NewGuy01 is offline  
Old 12-17-2019, 02:21 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 414
Default

Originally Posted by NewGuy01 View Post
I’m not sure I want to be at the bottom of SWA seniority list...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That can't happen anymore, unless you agree to it.
Texasbound is offline  
Old 12-17-2019, 02:23 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 414
Default

Originally Posted by VanDriver208 View Post
Yea...this might get interesting. Good luck everyone, keep your apps up to date.
Why keep your app up to date? If things get bad and Alaska fails, they get bought. Ever met anyone that left airline A to go to B and then B buys A the next week? Happed to more that a few, lost a lot of years of seniority.
Texasbound is offline  
Old 12-17-2019, 03:25 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 279
Default 5/2020 bid

Tell SWA management that. (In reference to a possible SLI)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thrill is offline  
Old 12-17-2019, 03:31 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 936
Default

Originally Posted by Texasbound View Post
That can't happen anymore, unless you agree to it.


Sadly, that is what I’m afraid of my friend...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NewGuy01 is offline  
Old 12-18-2019, 06:20 AM
  #107  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,439
Default

Originally Posted by Texasbound View Post
That can't happen anymore, unless you agree to it.
It happened to tranny but I don't think it could happen to AS. I don't think SW could actually afford to buy AS and then liquidate and transfer assets. Slots and gates allocated to AS are not owned by AS, and therefore would likely not automatically transfer to a successor.

Also AS is too big, couldn't hire and train pilots fast enough, and couldn't afford to buy AS and then park it while they slowly assimilate the assets.

While the SW pilots would be happy to spend billions of the shareholders money to pull of an end-run SLI staple job, their managers wouldn't, nor would their BoD or shareholders let them. The SW pilots would just have to live with a likely arbitrated SLI, per established precedent. Management doesn't care about their pilots THAT much.

Also AS has got to have successorship scope???
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-18-2019, 07:45 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 936
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post



Also AS has got to have successorship scope???

LOL


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NewGuy01 is offline  
Old 12-18-2019, 02:06 PM
  #109  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Ask an ex-Trannie how the SWA SLI philosophy is applied.
Packrat is offline  
Old 12-19-2019, 05:02 AM
  #110  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,439
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat View Post
Ask an ex-Trannie how the SWA SLI philosophy is applied.
I know how it was applied, but SW threatened to liquidate and part-out the airline if they didn't "voluntarily" accept a staple job.

My premise is that AS is to big (and expensive in this context) to liquidate... for the sole purpose of doing an end-run around Mccaskil-Bond just to give SW pilots an upper-hand (staple) in an SLI. Don't think SW management cares that much about how senior their legacy pilots are.

Presumably SW wanted to ditch the tranny 717's anyway. In the case of AS, *presumably* part of their intent would be to acquire a small-ish airbus subfleet to try it out for a while with an eye towards long-term diversification. If the max crashes had happened 5-8 years from now and grounded the majority of SW's fleet for 1+ years, they would be SOL (or at least in need of a big federal bailout).
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jsled
United
232
07-24-2016 09:34 AM
YourFnout
American
29
11-14-2013 08:26 AM
appDude
Cargo
14
08-08-2013 03:10 PM
DLax85
Cargo
25
05-24-2008 07:27 PM
Freight Dog
Cargo
19
11-23-2006 09:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices