Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Alaska vs. The Beer Flu >

Alaska vs. The Beer Flu

Search

Notices

Alaska vs. The Beer Flu

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2020 | 01:11 PM
  #81  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NewGuy01
Ok I’ll try again:

If we have 60 bookings going to Kansas City from Seattle in October who do you think will fly it? Horizon or Alaska?

Why do we have the strategy of developing a market with a 175 and then switching to a 737 when the bookings allow?

It’s cheaper to run a 175 when you don’t have a full aircraft. And the bottom 1/2 of the seniority will suffer for it.

Not that the majority of the pilots in the last 1000 seniority numbers left at AS will care. They didn’t ask for scope and during the last furlough they were picking up premium.

I listened to the guys who were furloughed last time when I flew with them on reserve. It’s every man for himself at AS when times are hard.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You cry and ramble a lot. Your understanding of aviation and economics are poor. Hope you find your way!
Reply
Old 03-28-2020 | 01:27 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 936
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
You cry and ramble a lot. Your understanding of aviation and economics are poor. Hope you find your way!
I just see deflection's here. Am I throwing out acronyms and pretending to be all knowing? No. If you have 60 bookings do you fly a 900 to Kansas City or a 175. It's a really easy question. I'm asking because I don't know but just sending out acronyms doesn't mean you know anything or are answering a question.

Also please stop pretending you care about the junior pilots. Clearly you don't. You've already been called out for trying to scare everyone junior by other posters. There is no possible way for anyone to know what will happen in October.
Reply
Old 03-28-2020 | 01:40 PM
  #83  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,874
Likes: 674
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by NewGuy01
Also please stop pretending you care about the junior pilots. Clearly you don't. You've already been called out for trying to scare everyone junior by other posters. There is no possible way for anyone to know what will happen in October.
Furloughs are happening, almost assuredly, at all of the majors. No point in pretending otherwise.

If anything his numbers are pretty comforting (ie low) compared to what the big three are looking at. If AS can get away with a few hundred, I'd be thankful... even if you're one of them, you'll get recalled that much sooner.
Reply
Old 03-28-2020 | 02:13 PM
  #84  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NewGuy01
I just see deflection's here. Am I throwing out acronyms and pretending to be all knowing? No. If you have 60 bookings do you fly a 900 to Kansas City or a 175. It's a really easy question. I'm asking because I don't know but just sending out acronyms doesn't mean you know anything or are answering a question.

Also please stop pretending you care about the junior pilots. Clearly you don't. You've already been called out for trying to scare everyone junior by other posters. There is no possible way for anyone to know what will happen in October.
I can’t believe I am stopping so low. A175 is great at filling holes, limiting loses, and building markets. The economy will return 12-18 mos from now, and then a NB will blow a 175 out of the market.

SEA-MCI
175
10,700 cost to operate
at 85% load factor, expected revenue 10,820

900ER
18,160 cost to operate
at 85% load factor, 25,342

If you go head to head 175’s against SWA NB’s we will be out of business in months.

have you heard of independence air?
Reply
Old 03-28-2020 | 02:15 PM
  #85  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,874
Likes: 674
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
I can’t believe I am stopping so low. A175 is great at filling holes, limiting loses, and building markets. The economy will return 12-18 mos from now, and then a NB will blow a 175 out of the market.

SEA-MCI
175
10,700 cost to operate
at 85% load factor, expected revenue 10,820

900ER
18,160 cost to operate
at 85% load factor, 25,342

If you go head to head 175’s against SWA NB’s we will be out of business in months.

have you heard of independence air?
He is correct, a NB is definitely more cost-effective... if you can mostly fill it up.
Reply
Old 03-28-2020 | 02:18 PM
  #86  
New Hire
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Yeah, they have to try to lead turn this... plan to staff for where they *think* things will settle out later in the year.

If they cut too many, they might lose market share in a big land grab if DL or SW manages to be prepared to swoop in (DL unlikely, they'll be lucky not to liquidate... SW is a more plausible threat).
LMAO, right Delta will liquidate... that is some serious wishful thinking!!!!!
Reply
Old 03-28-2020 | 02:22 PM
  #87  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,874
Likes: 674
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpurgatory
LMAO, right Delta will liquidate... that is some serious wishful thinking!!!!!
That was dramatic license, point being they are probably too distracted to be plotting how to screw over AS right now.

But DL might even be in worse shape than the AA/UA.
Reply
Old 03-28-2020 | 02:25 PM
  #88  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpurgatory
LMAO, right Delta will liquidate... that is some serious wishful thinking!!!!!
No one would wish for that. The big three are in for a slog, for the next two years. International is going to be a lot slower curve to return. The economist Alaska paid to evaluate all saw DAL, AMR, and UAL around 525-680 aircraft in the next 12 months, with AMR the most likely to file.
Reply
Old 03-28-2020 | 03:44 PM
  #89  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 74
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
No one would wish for that. The big three are in for a slog, for the next two years. International is going to be a lot slower curve to return. The economist Alaska paid to evaluate all saw DAL, AMR, and UAL around 525-680 aircraft in the next 12 months, with AMR the most likely to file.
What did the economist say about Southwest?
Reply
Old 03-28-2020 | 03:53 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 936
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
I can’t believe I am stopping so low. A175 is great at filling holes, limiting loses, and building markets. The economy will return 12-18 mos from now, and then a NB will blow a 175 out of the market.



SEA-MCI

175

10,700 cost to operate

at 85% load factor, expected revenue 10,820



900ER

18,160 cost to operate

at 85% load factor, 25,342



If you go head to head 175’s against SWA NB’s we will be out of business in months.



have you heard of independence air?


Your math is based on 85% load factors? For both aircraft? I hope this company is run by people smarter than you.

Of course an 85% full 73 makes more money than a regional airplane.

When do you think we’ll see loads like that again? I haven’t seen more than 15 passengers in over a week.

Never mind please don’t answer that. You’ve obviously hit your head on the overhead panel far too many times.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mike734
Alaska
42
01-12-2022 12:10 AM
Chinabug
Hiring News
98
10-20-2011 08:53 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
1
05-03-2011 05:44 PM
Ak Pilot
Major
7
07-10-2008 09:30 AM
Freight Dog
Major
1
05-02-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices