SAN Base opening, finally…
#131
I wouldn't be that surprised if SWA opened a base.
But from their perspective, as a TX airline, they'd probably rather minimize roots in a high tax (for employers) state like CA.
And they don't own SAN, it's very much in play between SW and AS. SW is slightly ahead in the race, and the new terminal is a huge deal for them.
Their new business model might give them an advantage but basically to me it looks like they're trying to become AS
In doing so they've alienated some of their loyal customers.
But from their perspective, as a TX airline, they'd probably rather minimize roots in a high tax (for employers) state like CA.
And they don't own SAN, it's very much in play between SW and AS. SW is slightly ahead in the race, and the new terminal is a huge deal for them.
Their new business model might give them an advantage but basically to me it looks like they're trying to become AS
In doing so they've alienated some of their loyal customers.
#132
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 680
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
People who get fired seem to try pretty hard. Don't do blatantly stooopid stuff, and if you get called on it don't double down (or lie about it FFS).
The wifi incidents I'm aware of were frequent flyer problem kids, who really kept pushing it. Wifi was probably just the final straw (or the excuse they needed).
Don't access company systems via airplane wifi while flying. Personally I just don't use wifi/internet at all during block time. I have enough IT savvy to know how easy it is for them to see that, you're just handing them all the rope they need, for whenever they decide to use it.
#133
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 258
Likes: 7
From: A320 CA
Newsflash, I know a lot of Pilots don’t want to hear it but, if the SAN “takes off (aka: is successful)”, the SFO base will surely close!
The reason very simple: COST!
There is zero chance that DM keeps talking about “savings, savings, savings” and yet turns around by opening a base which requires a lounge, a Chief Pilot, an Admin etc., etc., hence increased cost. It just doesn’t make sense and it’s not how AS operates!
The reason very simple: COST!
There is zero chance that DM keeps talking about “savings, savings, savings” and yet turns around by opening a base which requires a lounge, a Chief Pilot, an Admin etc., etc., hence increased cost. It just doesn’t make sense and it’s not how AS operates!
#134
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 672
Likes: 223
Newsflash, I know a lot of Pilots don’t want to hear it but, if the SAN “takes off (aka: is successful)”, the SFO base will surely close!
The reason very simple: COST!
There is zero chance that DM keeps talking about “savings, savings, savings” and yet turns around by opening a base which requires a lounge, a Chief Pilot, an Admin etc., etc., hence increased cost. It just doesn’t make sense and it’s not how AS operates!
The reason very simple: COST!
There is zero chance that DM keeps talking about “savings, savings, savings” and yet turns around by opening a base which requires a lounge, a Chief Pilot, an Admin etc., etc., hence increased cost. It just doesn’t make sense and it’s not how AS operates!
#135
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 34
Likes: 10
This ^.. I wouldn’t be surprised if Alaskan is getting rid of the widebodies ( aircraft ) . They just can’t compete. Did not secure slots in London 🤣. Stock price down 30-% YTD. 5 aircraft type. One fleet is so small, might as well get rid of it .
Telling pilots to save more gas and to think twice when to de-ice.. what’s this ..“ getting back to business „ nonsense . What you think the pilots have been doing . Maybe shake up in the C suite is necessary
Telling pilots to save more gas and to think twice when to de-ice.. what’s this ..“ getting back to business „ nonsense . What you think the pilots have been doing . Maybe shake up in the C suite is necessary
#136
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 680
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Newsflash, I know a lot of Pilots don’t want to hear it but, if the SAN “takes off (aka: is successful)”, the SFO base will surely close!
The reason very simple: COST!
There is zero chance that DM keeps talking about “savings, savings, savings” and yet turns around by opening a base which requires a lounge, a Chief Pilot, an Admin etc., etc., hence increased cost. It just doesn’t make sense and it’s not how AS operates!
The reason very simple: COST!
There is zero chance that DM keeps talking about “savings, savings, savings” and yet turns around by opening a base which requires a lounge, a Chief Pilot, an Admin etc., etc., hence increased cost. It just doesn’t make sense and it’s not how AS operates!
As long as the man tossed it out there, I'll speculate about operational reliability, specifically commuters showing up for LC assignments...
One one hand I'm skeptical that commuter reliability is really the tipping point as to whether a hub succeeds. Obviously a lot more goes into that.
But OTH I guess I could see a situation where management has committed very significant resources (planes, gates, staff) and then finds the whole thing is a chit show because pilots don't show up... maybe good load factors but flights canx for crew?
Especially if the reliability is perhaps in stark contrast to other bases? I admit I'd be curious as to the demographics involved... east coast/midwest commuters tend to be older VX people, since few people intentionally sign up at AS with an intent to commute that far. Or is it younger, junior folks, with shorter commutes?
#137
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 672
Likes: 223
It's possible.
As long as the man tossed it out there, I'll speculate about operational reliability, specifically commuters showing up for LC assignments...
One one hand I'm skeptical that commuter reliability is really the tipping point as to whether a hub succeeds. Obviously a lot more goes into that.
But OTH I guess I could see a situation where management has committed very significant resources (planes, gates, staff) and then finds the whole thing is a chit show because pilots don't show up... maybe good load factors but flights canx for crew?
Especially if the reliability is perhaps in stark contrast to other bases? I admit I'd be curious as to the demographics involved... east coast/midwest commuters tend to be older VX people, since few people intentionally sign up at AS with an intent to commute that far. Or is it younger, junior folks, with shorter commutes?
As long as the man tossed it out there, I'll speculate about operational reliability, specifically commuters showing up for LC assignments...
One one hand I'm skeptical that commuter reliability is really the tipping point as to whether a hub succeeds. Obviously a lot more goes into that.
But OTH I guess I could see a situation where management has committed very significant resources (planes, gates, staff) and then finds the whole thing is a chit show because pilots don't show up... maybe good load factors but flights canx for crew?
Especially if the reliability is perhaps in stark contrast to other bases? I admit I'd be curious as to the demographics involved... east coast/midwest commuters tend to be older VX people, since few people intentionally sign up at AS with an intent to commute that far. Or is it younger, junior folks, with shorter commutes?
#138
It's possible.
As long as the man tossed it out there, I'll speculate about operational reliability, specifically commuters showing up for LC assignments...
One one hand I'm skeptical that commuter reliability is really the tipping point as to whether a hub succeeds. Obviously a lot more goes into that.
But OTH I guess I could see a situation where management has committed very significant resources (planes, gates, staff) and then finds the whole thing is a chit show because pilots don't show up... maybe good load factors but flights canx for crew?
Especially if the reliability is perhaps in stark contrast to other bases? I admit I'd be curious as to the demographics involved... east coast/midwest commuters tend to be older VX people, since few people intentionally sign up at AS with an intent to commute that far. Or is it younger, junior folks, with shorter commutes?
As long as the man tossed it out there, I'll speculate about operational reliability, specifically commuters showing up for LC assignments...
One one hand I'm skeptical that commuter reliability is really the tipping point as to whether a hub succeeds. Obviously a lot more goes into that.
But OTH I guess I could see a situation where management has committed very significant resources (planes, gates, staff) and then finds the whole thing is a chit show because pilots don't show up... maybe good load factors but flights canx for crew?
Especially if the reliability is perhaps in stark contrast to other bases? I admit I'd be curious as to the demographics involved... east coast/midwest commuters tend to be older VX people, since few people intentionally sign up at AS with an intent to commute that far. Or is it younger, junior folks, with shorter commutes?
#139
It's possible.
As long as the man tossed it out there, I'll speculate about operational reliability, specifically commuters showing up for LC assignments...
One one hand I'm skeptical that commuter reliability is really the tipping point as to whether a hub succeeds. Obviously a lot more goes into that.
But OTH I guess I could see a situation where management has committed very significant resources (planes, gates, staff) and then finds the whole thing is a chit show because pilots don't show up... maybe good load factors but flights canx for crew?
Especially if the reliability is perhaps in stark contrast to other bases? I admit I'd be curious as to the demographics involved... east coast/midwest commuters tend to be older VX people, since few people intentionally sign up at AS with an intent to commute that far. Or is it younger, junior folks, with shorter commutes?
As long as the man tossed it out there, I'll speculate about operational reliability, specifically commuters showing up for LC assignments...
One one hand I'm skeptical that commuter reliability is really the tipping point as to whether a hub succeeds. Obviously a lot more goes into that.
But OTH I guess I could see a situation where management has committed very significant resources (planes, gates, staff) and then finds the whole thing is a chit show because pilots don't show up... maybe good load factors but flights canx for crew?
Especially if the reliability is perhaps in stark contrast to other bases? I admit I'd be curious as to the demographics involved... east coast/midwest commuters tend to be older VX people, since few people intentionally sign up at AS with an intent to commute that far. Or is it younger, junior folks, with shorter commutes?
#140
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 680
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
It was a significant trend of LC reserves who would get a call out, then wait a few hours and call in sick. That's technically legal since you could *hypothetically* get food poisoning or whatever within that 14 hour window. But then it was too late to get another LC there in time.
Again, according to management, FWIW.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



