Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
SAN Base opening, finally… >

SAN Base opening, finally?

Search

Notices

SAN Base opening, finally…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2025 | 06:42 PM
  #131  
Jetlikespeed's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 875
Likes: 181
From: Captain
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I wouldn't be that surprised if SWA opened a base.

But from their perspective, as a TX airline, they'd probably rather minimize roots in a high tax (for employers) state like CA.

And they don't own SAN, it's very much in play between SW and AS. SW is slightly ahead in the race, and the new terminal is a huge deal for them.

Their new business model might give them an advantage but basically to me it looks like they're trying to become AS In doing so they've alienated some of their loyal customers.
they basically turned around what Southwest was and what made them fundamentally different and unique into just every other airline. Now they have a way to generate extra revenue, but now nothing really separates them from any other generic airline. Basically just Alaska without a first first class or meals.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 06:48 PM
  #132  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 680
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
I know of a couple of terminations, and I would say some of them are gross abuses of the system, like the commuter hotel policy for instance.

Show up, do your job, call in sick when unfit to fly, enjoy, and retire.
Yes. I'd say something if I saw something, but I haven't.

People who get fired seem to try pretty hard. Don't do blatantly stooopid stuff, and if you get called on it don't double down (or lie about it FFS).

The wifi incidents I'm aware of were frequent flyer problem kids, who really kept pushing it. Wifi was probably just the final straw (or the excuse they needed).

Don't access company systems via airplane wifi while flying. Personally I just don't use wifi/internet at all during block time. I have enough IT savvy to know how easy it is for them to see that, you're just handing them all the rope they need, for whenever they decide to use it.
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 03:22 AM
  #133  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 258
Likes: 7
From: A320 CA
Default

Newsflash, I know a lot of Pilots don’t want to hear it but, if the SAN “takes off (aka: is successful)”, the SFO base will surely close!
The reason very simple: COST!

There is zero chance that DM keeps talking about “savings, savings, savings” and yet turns around by opening a base which requires a lounge, a Chief Pilot, an Admin etc., etc., hence increased cost. It just doesn’t make sense and it’s not how AS operates!

Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 05:53 AM
  #134  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 672
Likes: 223
Default

Originally Posted by airb320
Newsflash, I know a lot of Pilots don’t want to hear it but, if the SAN “takes off (aka: is successful)”, the SFO base will surely close!
The reason very simple: COST!

There is zero chance that DM keeps talking about “savings, savings, savings” and yet turns around by opening a base which requires a lounge, a Chief Pilot, an Admin etc., etc., hence increased cost. It just doesn’t make sense and it’s not how AS operates!
Let’s just base everyone in Seattle. It will save money! That’s how Alaska operates. We make money by saving money.
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 06:38 AM
  #135  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 34
Likes: 10
Default

This ^.. I wouldn’t be surprised if Alaskan is getting rid of the widebodies ( aircraft ) . They just can’t compete. Did not secure slots in London 🤣. Stock price down 30-% YTD. 5 aircraft type. One fleet is so small, might as well get rid of it .
Telling pilots to save more gas and to think twice when to de-ice.. what’s this ..“ getting back to business „ nonsense . What you think the pilots have been doing . Maybe shake up in the C suite is necessary
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 06:44 AM
  #136  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 680
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by airb320
Newsflash, I know a lot of Pilots don’t want to hear it but, if the SAN “takes off (aka: is successful)”, the SFO base will surely close!
The reason very simple: COST!

There is zero chance that DM keeps talking about “savings, savings, savings” and yet turns around by opening a base which requires a lounge, a Chief Pilot, an Admin etc., etc., hence increased cost. It just doesn’t make sense and it’s not how AS operates!
It's possible.

As long as the man tossed it out there, I'll speculate about operational reliability, specifically commuters showing up for LC assignments...

One one hand I'm skeptical that commuter reliability is really the tipping point as to whether a hub succeeds. Obviously a lot more goes into that.

But OTH I guess I could see a situation where management has committed very significant resources (planes, gates, staff) and then finds the whole thing is a chit show because pilots don't show up... maybe good load factors but flights canx for crew?

Especially if the reliability is perhaps in stark contrast to other bases? I admit I'd be curious as to the demographics involved... east coast/midwest commuters tend to be older VX people, since few people intentionally sign up at AS with an intent to commute that far. Or is it younger, junior folks, with shorter commutes?
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 06:55 AM
  #137  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 672
Likes: 223
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
It's possible.

As long as the man tossed it out there, I'll speculate about operational reliability, specifically commuters showing up for LC assignments...

One one hand I'm skeptical that commuter reliability is really the tipping point as to whether a hub succeeds. Obviously a lot more goes into that.

But OTH I guess I could see a situation where management has committed very significant resources (planes, gates, staff) and then finds the whole thing is a chit show because pilots don't show up... maybe good load factors but flights canx for crew?

Especially if the reliability is perhaps in stark contrast to other bases? I admit I'd be curious as to the demographics involved... east coast/midwest commuters tend to be older VX people, since few people intentionally sign up at AS with an intent to commute that far. Or is it younger, junior folks, with shorter commutes?
What about having reserves to cover flights when people miss their commutes?
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 07:00 AM
  #138  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 351
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
It's possible.

As long as the man tossed it out there, I'll speculate about operational reliability, specifically commuters showing up for LC assignments...

One one hand I'm skeptical that commuter reliability is really the tipping point as to whether a hub succeeds. Obviously a lot more goes into that.

But OTH I guess I could see a situation where management has committed very significant resources (planes, gates, staff) and then finds the whole thing is a chit show because pilots don't show up... maybe good load factors but flights canx for crew?

Especially if the reliability is perhaps in stark contrast to other bases? I admit I'd be curious as to the demographics involved... east coast/midwest commuters tend to be older VX people, since few people intentionally sign up at AS with an intent to commute that far. Or is it younger, junior folks, with shorter commutes?
When the benchmark is SEA, and management has spent decades watching pilots sit in the parking lot just waiting for assignments and gobbling up everything, to only say "thank you, sir, may I have another," it has set a false economy of expectations on how a base should operate. Reserves get used and abused, yet fatigue calls are probably not commensurate with that abuse. The rest of the airline industry gets it; Alaska simply still does not. I thought they were evolving, I thought they were going to come around, as it is 2025, and there were several things DM and management did that showed they had some finger on the pulse of the industry. But nope, bases just have 100% local residents, no commuters, no sick calls, no fatigue calls, just unwavering dedication to the supreme leader in SEA. They close a base and just assume everyone will uproot their families to Gig Harbor. The global airline mentality that is needed, is farther away than I thought it was.
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 07:05 AM
  #139  
PineappleXpres's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 110
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
It's possible.

As long as the man tossed it out there, I'll speculate about operational reliability, specifically commuters showing up for LC assignments...

One one hand I'm skeptical that commuter reliability is really the tipping point as to whether a hub succeeds. Obviously a lot more goes into that.

But OTH I guess I could see a situation where management has committed very significant resources (planes, gates, staff) and then finds the whole thing is a chit show because pilots don't show up... maybe good load factors but flights canx for crew?

Especially if the reliability is perhaps in stark contrast to other bases? I admit I'd be curious as to the demographics involved... east coast/midwest commuters tend to be older VX people, since few people intentionally sign up at AS with an intent to commute that far. Or is it younger, junior folks, with shorter commutes?
Is there a time in history, at a major, where pilots absenteeism caused a base closure. That feels like fiction. People commute to Hawaii for heaven sakes and it’s never an issue.
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 07:26 AM
  #140  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 680
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by MrBogardi
What about having reserves to cover flights when people miss their commutes?
The pain, according to flight ops management, wasn't just reserves struggling with their commute.

It was a significant trend of LC reserves who would get a call out, then wait a few hours and call in sick. That's technically legal since you could *hypothetically* get food poisoning or whatever within that 14 hour window. But then it was too late to get another LC there in time.

Again, according to management, FWIW.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyGuy2021
American
995
11-30-2023 03:40 PM
mike734
Horizon Air
4031
01-30-2023 06:00 PM
FlyGuy2112
Republic Airways
136
01-17-2021 04:09 PM
Joliet
PSA Airlines
33
02-20-2014 03:21 AM
duder
Compass Airlines
10
11-14-2013 04:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices