Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
SAN Base opening, finally… >

SAN Base opening, finally?

Search

Notices

SAN Base opening, finally…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2025 | 06:03 PM
  #231  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 132
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by GoodJet
You're just making stuff up.
Nothing personal, but the narrative is spot on.
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 06:09 PM
  #232  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 351
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by flyinbybraille
Nothing personal, but the narrative is spot on.
Unfortunately, he would never allow any self-reflection, and actually make a change.
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 06:21 PM
  #233  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 186
Default

Originally Posted by flyinbybraille
Nothing personal, but the narrative is spot on.
No more van tips for you lol
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 06:22 PM
  #234  
Jetlikespeed's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 876
Likes: 181
From: Captain
Default

I’m gonna “do math,” which is always risky, but here’s my back-of-the-napkin tinfoil-hat take.

Management said roughly a 25% reduction across LAX + SFO over the next two bids. If you assume that gets split roughly evenly, call it ~13% per bid — and to make it appropriately Alaska, assume worst-case numbers.

SFO CA BPL: 214

13% of 214 ≈ 28.

Round it Alaska-style: ~30 displaced.

LAX CA BPL: 269

13% of 269 ≈ 35.

Again, worst-case: ~36, but if we want to “Alaska math” our way conservative, call it ~30 from SFO + 36 from LAX = 66 displaced captains in round one.

Now, pair that with what’s actually being added:

SAN is getting ~80 CA vacancies, plus the VP said ~20–30 system upgrades on top of that. Even if we low-ball it to 15 real upgrades, that still means the number of total upgrades (SAN + system-wide) exceeds the number of displacements.

This is where the human-factors roulette wheel comes in:
• Some senior FOs will chase upgrades.

• Some junior CAs who are currently commuting may decide SAN is better than downgrading.

• Others may choose to downgrade rather than commute.

• Nobody can model that behavior cleanly — but the math still leans toward more upgrades than displacements, not a downgrade bloodbath.

With conservative numbers, I get something like:
66 displacements

≈ 80 SAN vacancies + 15 low-ball upgrades

→ Net ~29–31 upgrades

Again, that’s lowballing the system-wide upgrade piece and assuming maximum displacement.

Nothing here looks like the sky is falling. If anything, SAN plus the system upgrades create enough suction that most of the turbulence gets absorbed.

As for PBP, between the IT outage and the federal shutdown, nobody should be expecting anything above about three percent. Hope for more, but I’m gonna gamble mine on Ohio state football future national camps to double it

that would also track with the hiring class of 20 next week puts down to 40 vacancies still left. this San Diego base opening plus additional upgrades will create about 50 additional vacancies getting us to the 90s hiring in Q1 for a total of 130 any of us thought. Skys not falling
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 06:25 PM
  #235  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 672
Likes: 223
Default

Originally Posted by word302
Better than 25%.
oh wow he has to go be top 25%

that’s terrible!!
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 06:32 PM
  #236  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 186
Default

Originally Posted by Jetlikespeed
I’m gonna “do math,” which is always risky, but here’s my back-of-the-napkin tinfoil-hat take.

Management said roughly a 25% reduction across LAX + SFO over the next two bids. If you assume that gets split roughly evenly, call it ~13% per bid — and to make it appropriately Alaska, assume worst-case numbers.

SFO CA BPL: 214

13% of 214 ≈ 28.

Round it Alaska-style: ~30 displaced.

LAX CA BPL: 269

13% of 269 ≈ 35.

Again, worst-case: ~36, but if we want to “Alaska math” our way conservative, call it ~30 from SFO + 36 from LAX = 66 displaced captains in round one.

Now, pair that with what’s actually being added:

SAN is getting ~80 CA vacancies, plus the VP said ~20–30 system upgrades on top of that. Even if we low-ball it to 15 real upgrades, that still means the number of total upgrades (SAN + system-wide) exceeds the number of displacements.

This is where the human-factors roulette wheel comes in:
• Some senior FOs will chase upgrades.

• Some junior CAs who are currently commuting may decide SAN is better than downgrading.

• Others may choose to downgrade rather than commute.

• Nobody can model that behavior cleanly — but the math still leans toward more upgrades than displacements, not a downgrade bloodbath.

With conservative numbers, I get something like:
66 displacements

≈ 80 SAN vacancies + 15 low-ball upgrades

→ Net ~29–31 upgrades

Again, that’s lowballing the system-wide upgrade piece and assuming maximum displacement.

Nothing here looks like the sky is falling. If anything, SAN plus the system upgrades create enough suction that most of the turbulence gets absorbed.

As for PBP, between the IT outage and the federal shutdown, nobody should be expecting anything above about three percent. Hope for more, but I’m gonna gamble mine on Ohio state football future national camps to double it

that would also track with the hiring class of 20 next week puts down to 40 vacancies still left. this San Diego base opening plus additional upgrades will create about 50 additional vacancies getting us to the 90s hiring in Q1 for a total of 130 any of us thought. Skys not falling
Did you read that Q4 profit was just revised down by 75%

https://m.uk.investing.com/news/sec-...0301?ampMode=1


Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 06:44 PM
  #237  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 672
Likes: 223
Default

Originally Posted by GoodJet
Did you read that Q4 profit was just revised down by 75%

https://m.uk.investing.com/news/sec-...0301?ampMode=1
You probably shouldn’t look at PBP as a guaranteed thing, just like a spot as a junior CA
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 06:45 PM
  #238  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 73
Likes: 10
From: PT-17, Rear
Default

Originally Posted by GoodJet
Did you read that Q4 profit was just revised down by 75%

https://m.uk.investing.com/news/sec-...0301?ampMode=1
Got it. Still profitable.

What about commentary on the math from the post you replied to?
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 06:46 PM
  #239  
Jetlikespeed's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 876
Likes: 181
From: Captain
Default

Originally Posted by GoodJet
Did you read that Q4 profit was just revised down by 75%

https://m.uk.investing.com/news/sec-...0301?ampMode=1
Yes, from $0.40 a share down to $0.10 a share. Still a profit if they pull it off. I genuinely want this place to do well. That’s why I said I’m expecting around 3% from coming in 4th and not getting the profit multiplier that would’ve pushed us toward 6%.

I’m pretty sure I said almost the same thing yesterday, but I’m not sure how that came from a displacement doom senario. It felt like you got news that wasn’t nearly as negative as you feared, and your instinct was still to drop a little bad news confetti on the table.

I wish I could take on some of the weight you’re clearly carrying, the stuff that makes every bit of good news look like a storm cell with a hook echo. Praying for you, brother. I hope your bike trails stay dry, that you stick the jumps you’re chasing, and that the bike you want pops up with a ridiculous discount

Crack the heart open a bit. Let a little light in. Riding around with everything set to “low IFR” gets old fast.
Reply
Old 12-03-2025 | 07:01 PM
  #240  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 186
Default

Originally Posted by Capo2ndFret
Got it. Still profitable.

What about commentary on the math from the post you replied to?
It was super well thought out. We both arrived at the same numbers to be displaced. He seems like a super smart guy but IMO gives the company way too much credit in terms of new captains to be hired. Another problem is a lot of very senior FOs will upgrade and sit reserve in SAN. Some of the coolest people I’ve flown with. Who found a really solid niche flying trips out of SNA and avoiding the drive up to LAX.

Im of the mindset that the company shouldn’t be downgrading their pilots before an SLI. This will have a big impact on 40-60 pilots careers, earning potential and retirement. At an airline that has traditionally not provided their pilots with a reliable or enviable career track. It seems extremely callous but that’s been my general impression of this place since I started working here.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyGuy2021
American
995
11-30-2023 03:40 PM
mike734
Horizon Air
4031
01-30-2023 06:00 PM
FlyGuy2112
Republic Airways
136
01-17-2021 04:09 PM
Joliet
PSA Airlines
33
02-20-2014 03:21 AM
duder
Compass Airlines
10
11-14-2013 04:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices