Notices

Allegiant Air

Old 01-09-2016 | 03:00 AM
  #1181  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 15
From: Hoping for any position
Default

Originally Posted by LavStink
"I don't need this," he said. "I don't need the job. It is going to take a crash to get everybody's attention on this baloney. Allegiant has lost control of its product in house. Their maintenance is nothing short of obscene."

http://home.tampabay.com/news/business/airlines/former-allegiant-air-mechanic-says-he-quit-over-obscene-maintenance/2260591
Is this in the print edition of the paper?
Reply
Old 01-09-2016 | 04:17 AM
  #1182  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: Off to the left!
Default

There's nothing really new or earth shattering in that article. It's all things I experienced in my time there. Circuit breakers not pulled according to MEL, MEL's applied that had nothing to do with the actual problem, or just the completely wrong MEL used.

Although my personal favorite MEL was MEL'ing the ART for excessive EGT on takeoff. This had nothing to do with what the problem was, and it made the EGT even hotter. Anyone remember the scale they used to have based on how high the EGT was? I think it was A, B, C, etc., and depending on how high it went you either continued on or had to return. Or the fact they said they would never have the ART on MEL for both engines at the same time, but routinely did? Good times.....

One of the many reasons why I left after almost 10 years.
Reply
Old 01-09-2016 | 05:59 AM
  #1183  
Vegaspilot's Avatar
Gets Tue/Wed and Sat Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by eagleatr
There's nothing really new or earth shattering in that article. It's all things I experienced in my time there. Circuit breakers not pulled according to MEL, MEL's applied that had nothing to do with the actual problem, or just the completely wrong MEL used.

Although my personal favorite MEL was MEL'ing the ART for excessive EGT on takeoff. This had nothing to do with what the problem was, and it made the EGT even hotter. Anyone remember the scale they used to have based on how high the EGT was? I think it was A, B, C, etc., and depending on how high it went you either continued on or had to return. Or the fact they said they would never have the ART on MEL for both engines at the same time, but routinely did? Good times.....

One of the many reasons why I left after almost 10 years.
Yeah, the ART MEL is ridiculous...they went from only one engine on that MEL to putting the MEL twice on a release for a system there was only one of. And if the plane was red stickered, MC control couldn't tell you which engine it was on the program if you asked.
Reply
Old 01-09-2016 | 06:18 AM
  #1184  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: MD80
Default

Originally Posted by eagleatr
There's nothing really new or earth shattering in that article. It's all things I experienced in my time there. Circuit breakers not pulled according to MEL, MEL's applied that had nothing to do with the actual problem, or just the completely wrong MEL used.

Although my personal favorite MEL was MEL'ing the ART for excessive EGT on takeoff. This had nothing to do with what the problem was, and it made the EGT even hotter. Anyone remember the scale they used to have based on how high the EGT was? I think it was A, B, C, etc., and depending on how high it went you either continued on or had to return. Or the fact they said they would never have the ART on MEL for both engines at the same time, but routinely did? Good times.....

One of the many reasons why I left after almost 10 years.
Originally Posted by Vegaspilot
Yeah, the ART MEL is ridiculous...they went from only one engine on that MEL to putting the MEL twice on a release for a system there was only one of. And if the plane was red stickered, MC control couldn't tell you which engine it was on the program if you asked.
You both do realize that was/is a P&W and Boeing approved program? Not just something the company hatched up....

If you think really hard about the engineering behind the ART system and the issues associated with a low EGT margin takeoff, the procedure actually becomes understandable.

In the end, they need to just replace the stinking blades much sooner and stop most of this garbage.
Reply
Old 01-09-2016 | 06:25 AM
  #1185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: Off to the left!
Default

I know it's an approved procedure, but it's not a solution for what the real problem is: Poor engine overhauls and poor maintenance.

They can save a lot of money that way, at least until the engine fails.
Reply
Old 01-09-2016 | 06:54 AM
  #1186  
Vegaspilot's Avatar
Gets Tue/Wed and Sat Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Default

I understand the system, true red line is with the ART off. I get that, but P&W approved or not...doesn't mean I have to agree with it as a solution to get us thru the summer. Like eagleatr said, it's a band aid for a much bigger problem...they don't want to spend the money to have good engines back there.
Reply
Old 01-09-2016 | 07:21 AM
  #1187  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Default

Speaking of greedy, lying dirtbags and making false statements to the public and federal regulators. And willful falsification of maintenance records, lest we forget flight #436 LAS/PIA on August 17, 2015; Contract maintenance forgot to install a ‘cotter pin’ causing a catastrophic failure in the tail assembly.

To which other MD80s were inspected and found with similar rigging issues, but was not properly disclosed contrary to public statements. Enjoy...
Reply
Old 01-09-2016 | 08:18 AM
  #1188  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: MD80
Default

Originally Posted by eagleatr
I know it's an approved procedure, but it's not a solution for what the real problem is: Poor engine overhauls and poor maintenance.

They can save a lot of money that way, at least until the engine fails.
Originally Posted by Vegaspilot
I understand the system, true red line is with the ART off. I get that, but P&W approved or not...doesn't mean I have to agree with it as a solution to get us thru the summer. Like eagleatr said, it's a band aid for a much bigger problem...they don't want to spend the money to have good engines back there.
I'm with ya... The last week or two proves without a doubt that we need to put some new parts in the old machines. I just fly with a lot of people that don't understand that 625 degrees in of itself doesn't make the engine "bad."

Someone told me that we put our blades through the shop 1 more time than Delta and AA.........and while legal, it's clearly not so smart.
Reply
Old 01-09-2016 | 09:10 AM
  #1189  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

What's weird to me is that the owners of that airline seem to have daily wheel barrels of cash coming in. Why would they want that to stop? There is only one logical conclusion at the rate things are going over there. Why would they want all that money to stop flowing in?
Reply
Old 01-09-2016 | 09:46 AM
  #1190  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by FirstClass
What's weird to me is that the owners of that airline seem to have daily wheel barrels of cash coming in. Why would they want that to stop? There is only one logical conclusion at the rate things are going over there. Why would they want all that money to stop flowing in?
Because, just like Valujet, when one airline crashes they can always start another one.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TonyWilliams
Foreign
116
07-30-2018 07:55 AM
winglet
Regional
47
05-15-2016 09:45 PM
pipercub
Allegiant
32
11-18-2015 09:12 PM
Flameout
Military
32
03-05-2010 12:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices