Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
New flows and checklists >

New flows and checklists

Search
Notices

New flows and checklists

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2019, 11:22 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Default

Originally Posted by RhinoBallAuto View Post
No change. Post PDC receipt and FMS entry. It's covered in OM vol2
I know, it is 2B-8, in START, Prior to Departure. But I'm asking in relation to the flows.

That prior to departure section is listed just prior to the Preflight Flow, but I don't think it has to be done then. The departure brief is also chronologically listed prior to this flow in the flow guide, but I think it would be a good idea to do it after the Preflight Flow to have the CVR on.

There is flexibility allowed in the flows, but I think that folks will fall into a patter of what/when. Just wondered how folks on the line are doing it and have you seen any variation. I realize it's early.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 11:29 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Default

I've had some guys say get in the airplane, do the Origination Flow, then get ATIS and PDC. Load the box and do route verification, brief THEN Preflight and Before Takeoff Flow. I've had others say do the Origination Flow, get ATIS and PDC then do Preflight Flows, then route verification and brief, then Before Start flows.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 05:35 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Posts: 900
Default

The new flows in the 190 aren't too bad. With the Origination Flow, the OM says it will "normally be accomplished by one pilot, normally the FO, but may be acccomplished by either pilot or collaboratively by both pilots.". It's definitely a little confusing if pilots are doing it "collaboratively", which is basically the old way we did it. If you do it "collaboratively", who does what?

Just got off a trip with a Captain who hadn't used the new flows/checklists either and there were definitely growing pains. I would say that whoever's leg it is does the Origination and loads the box while the other pilot goes out and does the exterior, but if you're flying with a Captain who sees "normally done by the first officer" and then the exterior inspection says, "normally accomplished by the first officer" then you've got one dude/dudet doing pretty much everything (the FO).

The new checklists, with the Captain or PF responding first to the challenger was a bit awkward, but by the end of a 4-day it got smoother. I'm still not sure I like it. The Captain is put on the spot with some of the responses, which just requires getting used to having that info out or written down for quick reference. In the past, it was normally just the FO needing to have that stuff readily available.
TankerDriver is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 05:41 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: 6th place
Posts: 1,826
Default

Originally Posted by TankerDriver View Post
The new flows in the 190 aren't too bad. With the Origination Flow, the OM says it will "normally be accomplished by one pilot, normally the FO, but may be acccomplished by either pilot or collaboratively by both pilots.". It's definitely a little confusing if pilots are doing it "collaboratively", which is basically the old way we did it. If you do it "collaboratively", who does what?

Just got off a trip with a Captain who hadn't used the new flows/checklists either and there were definitely growing pains. I would say that whoever's leg it is does the Origination and loads the box while the other pilot goes out and does the exterior, but if you're flying with a Captain who sees "normally done by the first officer" and then the exterior inspection says, "normally accomplished by the first officer" then you've got one dude/dudet doing pretty much everything (the FO).

The new checklists, with the Captain or PF responding first to the challenger was a bit awkward, but by the end of a 4-day it got smoother. I'm still not sure I like it. The Captain is put on the spot with some of the responses, which just requires getting used to having that info out or written down for quick reference. In the past, it was normally just the FO needing to have that stuff readily available.


A lot of the responses by the captain are challenging when taxiing, especially at night. You have to reference things that aren’t easy to see quickly, like the min TO fuel.

I get being standard between fleets but sometimes something’s gotta give.
mainlineAF is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 05:50 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Posts: 900
Default

Originally Posted by mainlineAF View Post
A lot of the responses by the captain are challenging when taxiing, especially at night. You have to reference things that aren’t easy to see quickly, like the min TO fuel.

I get being standard between fleets but sometimes something’s gotta give.
I agree. I believe the intent to some of these new flows and checklist was to eliminate doing a lot of things during Taxi but it is awkward when the captain's looking around the cockpit for the information to respond to the FO during taxi when his or her eyes should be outside.
TankerDriver is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 07:36 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 2,180
Default

Today was my first day on the line with the new procedures. My biggest beef with the new checklist on the Boeings is that it completely disregards the mechanical checklist and it's purpose. The new checklist seems choppy and doesn't flow well. The whole point of having the mechanical checklist is so that some items can be done out of order. It just doesn't make any sense.
EMBFlyer is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 07:16 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Buzzlightyear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 569
Default

Originally Posted by EMBFlyer View Post
Today was my first day on the line with the new procedures. My biggest beef with the new checklist on the Boeings is that it completely disregards the mechanical checklist and it's purpose. The new checklist seems choppy and doesn't flow well. The whole point of having the mechanical checklist is so that some items can be done out of order. It just doesn't make any sense.
I’ve noticed the same with the mechanical checklist. Expect several revisions.
Buzzlightyear is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 09:36 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 1,681
Default

Originally Posted by EMBFlyer View Post
Today was my first day on the line with the new procedures. My biggest beef with the new checklist on the Boeings is that it completely disregards the mechanical checklist and it's purpose. The new checklist seems choppy and doesn't flow well. The whole point of having the mechanical checklist is so that some items can be done out of order. It just doesn't make any sense.
Doesn’t make any sense on the AB either.

I think this is all the result of some pee pee contest by a couple of guys high up in training. Whomever won out just did it to prove he was more important.

Dropped a turd in every punch bowl.

There’s nothing about these flows and checklists which is an improvement in any way. The Capt is heads down very close to the end of the runway looking for fuel numbers.... (what could ever go wrong there?)

And the implementation was the worst thing I have ever seen in an airplane. It was simply shameful to turn everyone loose and say “have at it, just be careful.” No training. Hell-we do have a couple of videos now, but they have mistakes. Not sure how helpful that is.

Whomever made this decision: You had one job. Just one job.

I am disgusted to know that whomever cocked this up so badly gets paid a big enough mgmt bonus to buy a house each year.
jcountry is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 09:45 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Posts: 900
Default

Well, so what is our avenue to get it fixed?
TankerDriver is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 10:36 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,533
Default

Originally Posted by jcountry View Post
Doesn’t make any sense on the AB either.

I think this is all the result of some pee pee contest by a couple of guys high up in training. Whomever won out just did it to prove he was more important.

Dropped a turd in every punch bowl.

There’s nothing about these flows and checklists which is an improvement in any way. The Capt is heads down very close to the end of the runway looking for fuel numbers.... (what could ever go wrong there?)

And the implementation was the worst thing I have ever seen in an airplane. It was simply shameful to turn everyone loose and say “have at it, just be careful.” No training. Hell-we do have a couple of videos now, but they have mistakes. Not sure how helpful that is.

Whomever made this decision: You had one job. Just one job.

I am disgusted to know that whomever cocked this up so badly gets paid a big enough mgmt bonus to buy a house each year.
^^^THIS x a million! You’ve nailed my impressions of this whole debacle perfectly.

28 years in this business and I’ve never seen anything so poorly thought out and implemented. My prediction is the company will see a big increase in ASAP reports going forward.
450knotOffice is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RickJohnson
PSA Airlines
12
10-16-2019 05:55 PM
Mustache
PSA Airlines
22
06-09-2018 05:25 AM
lovellrt
SkyWest
15181
02-25-2016 05:47 PM
p1anejet
Regional
43
01-20-2012 07:47 PM
TravisUK
Flight Schools and Training
15
09-07-2006 08:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices